fspeedster

iTrader: (6)

It sure ain't..slanted rear is ugly and so is the front end..older model was actually a bit better.

JS

iTrader: (4)

I like the 13 CS....It just looks right to me....

RevGTO

iTrader: (12)

To me, the Bullitt Edition was a good-looking Mustang ... very clean lines. Too bad it didn't have the current powertrain.

Z28Z06

iTrader: (2)

01ssreda4

iTrader: (96)

My thoughts also.....

RaggedRides

iTrader: (8)

I really liked that they got rid of the massive black bulge that hung off the *** end for the last three years. That rear bumper is so much cleaner. I'm not feeling the hood, front end and body matched side molding though.

JS

iTrader: (4)

I like the body color cladding...I like the 13 much better, still the 11 body is still plenty nice...One things for sure, these 5.0's r quick....

RPM WS6

iTrader: (3)

I think I prefer the styling of the '10-'12 version as well, although I would still consider the '13 Mustang over a 5th gen Camaro.

1ltcap

i kinda like the headlights, although i still like the classic looking ones on the 012 better....but the new style are dam cool looking.
i like the tail lights....a LOT. but on the other hand, they say that the center light turns white when put in reverse......i like the dual lights per side in reverse on the 012.
i like the heat removal vents in the hood. i do not like the front fascia other than on the shelby though. it just looks out of place on a standard mustang.

ThisBlood147

The rear end is a step up. The hood and front end are a step back. The V6 and GT should NOT look identical to the GT500.

ramairroughneck

iTrader: (35)

I was really diggin the 5.0s until now

-Ross-

iTrader: (2)

I think the CS Mustang they used for this article is ugly. I hate those. Take away that stupid wing, those stupid wheels and that stupid side stripe and you have yourself a sexy car. You guys can't think every 13 5.0 GT is going to look like this one?

I agree with Guitar. The 10+ body style is WAY better looking than the 05-09's.