Edmunds Full-Test - Scion FR-S lightweight RWD coupe
#42
After further review, I really wouldn't be interested. I can see why a younger person would be, but once I got a close up, I honestly decided I'd much rather the slower and far more appealing Miata. I think the S2000 would be a better choice, used and all. This one seems over-priced for its performance level.
#45
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Honestly I have to say that after this car being such a let down I'm really NOT looking forward to the new Supra. The MKIV Supra was the last Toyota car I really liked. The LFA is about twice as much as it should have been ( $150k max), and the FR-S should have been around $15k with a more basic interior, or had ~275-300hp for the $25k they are asking.
#46
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agreed 100%. I got really excited when this car first started appearing; but back then it was either rumored that this car was going to have a 2.0 turbo inline 4 with a sticker below $20k. Had they built it like that I would own one. **** $25k for a non-turbo boxer motor with weak internals. The WRX is turbo'd with AWD for the exact same price as this car, no way I would ever take this over that.
Honestly I have to say that after this car being such a let down I'm really NOT looking forward to the new Supra. The MKIV Supra was the last Toyota car I really liked. The LFA is about twice as much as it should have been ( $150k max), and the FR-S should have been around $15k with a more basic interior, or had ~275-300hp for the $25k they are asking.
Honestly I have to say that after this car being such a let down I'm really NOT looking forward to the new Supra. The MKIV Supra was the last Toyota car I really liked. The LFA is about twice as much as it should have been ( $150k max), and the FR-S should have been around $15k with a more basic interior, or had ~275-300hp for the $25k they are asking.
#48
What would you use to hold the rest of the car together??? It would need a quality rear right away and by the time you finish upgrading to prevent it from ripping itself apart, it would probably have gained 300-500 lb!
#50
#52
#53
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not saying an LS-powered FR-S or BRZ wouldn't be loads of fun, but to say it's not a good car because it doesn't have 400hp+ is a bit silly. The car was designed for a specific purpose, and it's not for everybody.
#54
They could've used a 250-300hp engine and it would have made a real difference toward improving all aspects of performance. Well, that's my opinion, anyway.
Bottom line seems to be, it's a wonderful little car with a wretched drive line for the type of car it is. America may not have the autobahn, but it's not Japan either.
#55
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Waffle Land
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think nearly everyone here agrees(including me), but it seems the car is decent at everything for 1 and only 1 reason.... a so-so engine. I'm sure the engine itself is good, but since it so terribly lacks power and torque, the car suffers greatly vs what it could be and frankly, what the "powers that be" exclaimed to the world that it would be and indeed, was. Had they used a "serious" engine, this car would be a massive hit and probably wouldn't be deemed totally over-priced by most.
They could've used a 250-300hp engine and it would have made a real difference toward improving all aspects of performance. Well, that's my opinion, anyway.
Bottom line seems to be, it's a wonderful little car with a wretched drive line for the type of car it is. America may not have the autobahn, but it's not Japan either.
They could've used a 250-300hp engine and it would have made a real difference toward improving all aspects of performance. Well, that's my opinion, anyway.
Bottom line seems to be, it's a wonderful little car with a wretched drive line for the type of car it is. America may not have the autobahn, but it's not Japan either.
#57
I think these cars look amazing on the outside but the interior looks very cheap and out-dated. I can recall reading about this car before it actually was released and I think the auto makers are making this in hopes of a strong after-market community. Out of the box it comes with enough to keep most people relatively happy, but once the after-market products start coming in with nice turbo-chargers and all of those goodies...this car will be plenty fast enough. I just wish they would upgrade the interior.
#58
The Sti version will probably make poeple much happpier, but it will still be slower than a 5.0. People shouldn't expect miracles.
#59
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I imagine most of the people that judge what makes a "sports car" by straight line speed also think Mustangs and F-bodies are sports cars.