Automobile Mag: '12 ZL1 tops the '13 GT500, Part 1 of 3
#82
I am sure he was at some point. I was just laying out the mathematical representation of what 3 tenths and 7 tenths really are. I was just disputing that .3 tenths is right on his bumper, which it isn't. .3 tenths equals 30+ feet on average. These cars are 16 feet long, which would put 14 feet between rear bumper of the lead car, and front bumper of the following car.
#83
#84
I am sure he was at some point. I was just laying out the mathematical representation of what 3 tenths and 7 tenths really are. I was just disputing that .3 tenths is right on his bumper, which it isn't. .3 tenths equals 30+ feet on average. These cars are 16 feet long, which would put 14 feet between rear bumper of the lead car, and front bumper of the following car.
#85
You can also see in the comments that the pro driver botched a 2-3 shift in the ZL1 coming out of turn 10. I can guarantee he is a better driver than I am, but it sounds like more seat time in both cars would have netted better times. Maybe it could have been worse for the GT500...? Who knows.
that near 5mph difference right before turn 11 shows that the GT500 was playing catch up where it's strongest.
i still think the Boss and the ZL1 are a better match than the GT500 vs ZL1 though.
#86
Not at all. Think about it.... serious mods would be bigger bottom end (which the ford can't do), more boost of which the ford is already close to the top of that on pump gas.
Think of someone wanting a 427ci supercharged(1000hp+/- or so on pump) ZL1 bitch slapping that gt500. The chassis is already better on the zl1.
Think of someone wanting a 427ci supercharged(1000hp+/- or so on pump) ZL1 bitch slapping that gt500. The chassis is already better on the zl1.
#87
ZL-1 = 1:44.53
0.68 difference recorded at the line.
All I was stating was that your assumption that 0.3 seconds is nose to tail is not patently correct. At 30 mph, perhaps, at 100 mph, no chance. I just gave an example based on the average lap speed.
The point of my first long post was that the ZL1 loss at the drag strip, and the GT-500 loss at the 2 mile roadcourse are both statistically significant amounts from a purely racing perspective.
I find the map of the road course posted on page 4 interesting as well. They list what looks like the highest corner and straightline speed differentials.
Corner
ZL-1 54/GT-500 49.2 dif = 4.8 mph
Straight GT-500 129.2/ZL-1 124.6 dif = 4.6 mph
That tells you an aweful lot right there.
Truthfully, I like both of them, and would be happy with the keys to either.
Last edited by SSCamaro99_3; 06-20-2012 at 05:43 PM.
#88
GT-500 = 1:45.21
ZL-1 = 1:44.53
0.68 difference recorded at the line.
All I was stating was that your assumption that 0.3 seconds is nose to tail is not patently correct. At 30 mph, perhaps, at 100 mph, no chance. I just gave an example based on the average lap speed.
The point of my first long post was that the ZL1 loss at the drag strip, and the GT-500 loss at the 2 mile roadcourse are both statistically significant amounts from a purely racing perspective.
I find the map of the road course posted on page 4 interesting as well. They list what looks like the highest corner and straightline speed differentials.
Corner
ZL-1 54/GT-500 49.2 dif = 4.8 mph
Straight GT-500 129.2/ZL-1 124.6 dif = 4.6 mph
That tells you an aweful lot right there.
Truthfully, I like both of them, and would be happy with the keys to either.
ZL-1 = 1:44.53
0.68 difference recorded at the line.
All I was stating was that your assumption that 0.3 seconds is nose to tail is not patently correct. At 30 mph, perhaps, at 100 mph, no chance. I just gave an example based on the average lap speed.
The point of my first long post was that the ZL1 loss at the drag strip, and the GT-500 loss at the 2 mile roadcourse are both statistically significant amounts from a purely racing perspective.
I find the map of the road course posted on page 4 interesting as well. They list what looks like the highest corner and straightline speed differentials.
Corner
ZL-1 54/GT-500 49.2 dif = 4.8 mph
Straight GT-500 129.2/ZL-1 124.6 dif = 4.6 mph
That tells you an aweful lot right there.
Truthfully, I like both of them, and would be happy with the keys to either.
#89
GT-500 = 1:45.21
ZL-1 = 1:44.53
0.68 difference recorded at the line.
All I was stating was that your assumption that 0.3 seconds is nose to tail is not patently correct. At 30 mph, perhaps, at 100 mph, no chance. I just gave an example based on the average lap speed.
The point of my first long post was that the ZL1 loss at the drag strip, and the GT-500 loss at the 2 mile roadcourse are both statistically significant amounts from a purely racing perspective.
I find the map of the road course posted on page 4 interesting as well. They list what looks like the highest corner and straightline speed differentials.
Corner
ZL-1 54/GT-500 49.2 dif = 4.8 mph
Straight GT-500 129.2/ZL-1 124.6 dif = 4.6 mph
That tells you an aweful lot right there.
Truthfully, I like both of them, and would be happy with the keys to either.
ZL-1 = 1:44.53
0.68 difference recorded at the line.
All I was stating was that your assumption that 0.3 seconds is nose to tail is not patently correct. At 30 mph, perhaps, at 100 mph, no chance. I just gave an example based on the average lap speed.
The point of my first long post was that the ZL1 loss at the drag strip, and the GT-500 loss at the 2 mile roadcourse are both statistically significant amounts from a purely racing perspective.
I find the map of the road course posted on page 4 interesting as well. They list what looks like the highest corner and straightline speed differentials.
Corner
ZL-1 54/GT-500 49.2 dif = 4.8 mph
Straight GT-500 129.2/ZL-1 124.6 dif = 4.6 mph
That tells you an aweful lot right there.
Truthfully, I like both of them, and would be happy with the keys to either.
#90
Do you really love GM that much??? The old GT500s can hold up to around 1000whp without touching the motor. Unless you were talking about leaving the GT500 stock, in which case one could spend far less on a fox-body and leave the stock ZL1 in the dust Stock for stock, mod for mod the GT500 has a HUGE advantage at the strip.
#91
You're so blinded by the badge is not even funny anymore. Plenty of modulars have made 1k on stock engines there is no way you can make blanket statements like that (and I don't care enough to go back and research them all).
So the forced induction engine without forged internals is going to last longer on pump at 1k?
The GT500 ford fits perfectly in HIO land except that it's a ford. It's lighter, more mph, and it doesn't need aftermarket engine components; you of all people should be pumped
So the forced induction engine without forged internals is going to last longer on pump at 1k?
The GT500 ford fits perfectly in HIO land except that it's a ford. It's lighter, more mph, and it doesn't need aftermarket engine components; you of all people should be pumped
#92
Not at all. Think about it.... serious mods would be bigger bottom end (which the ford can't do), more boost of which the ford is already close to the top of that on pump gas.
Think of someone wanting a 427ci supercharged(1000hp+/- or so on pump) ZL1 bitch slapping that gt500. The chassis is already better on the zl1.
Think of someone wanting a 427ci supercharged(1000hp+/- or so on pump) ZL1 bitch slapping that gt500. The chassis is already better on the zl1.
And what you have all been waiting for: the ZL1... wins? haha, definetly a biased comparison.
http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews...gt500_on_road/
#93
"Honestly, babe! I know that Mustang just beat the ever living **** out of me from that last stoplight, but I swear I can beat him by a good 3/4's of a second on a closed 2.5 mile road course. Come on...I'll find a Taco Bell so we can turn that frown upside down and get you your favorite Double Decker Taco. Let me check my navigation to see where one is...****."
Last edited by -Ross-; 06-21-2012 at 12:35 PM.
#94
"Honestly, babe! I know that Mustang just beat the ever living **** out of me from that last stoplight, but I swear I can beat him by a good 3/4's of a second on a closed 2.5 mile road coarse. Come on...I'll find a Taco Bell so we can turn that frown upside down and get you your favorite Double Decker Taco. Let me check my navigation to see where one is...****."
#95
"Honestly, babe! I know that Mustang just beat the ever living **** out of me from that last stoplight, but I swear I can beat him by a good 3/4's of a second on a closed 2.5 mile road course. Come on...I'll find a Taco Bell so we can turn that frown upside down and get you your favorite Double Decker Taco. Let me check my navigation to see where one is...****."
Last edited by MeentSS02; 06-21-2012 at 12:39 PM.
#100
No but they were close even though elevation was high and the temperature was even higher. The car will do 200 but it takes such perfect conditions on a purpose built track that I could never understand why people care with any car not just this one.