Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Official - 2015 Ford Mustang Specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2014, 02:14 PM
  #21  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
'WHEELS''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This car looks good in person.
Old 07-18-2014, 06:22 PM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

I WILL get the new heads and whatever cobra jet intake that fits when its available and put them on my 2011gt.

the heads have revised higher ports and less port angle. the current coyote heads only have a 45 degree turn into the chamber. the new ones are better. the new ones also allow boss lift cams.


stock coyote heads and cams are reasonable for me.

im spending 6000-7000 on a elk hunt this fall lol

I expect this full bolt on to equal or exceed the boss 470-480rwhp mark.
Old 07-18-2014, 08:07 PM
  #23  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
I totally agree with this, however Im betting they are trying to market to the "import crowd", mostly blind kids that think turbo 4s are "cool".
I think they're probably trying to get good CAFE numbers, since (as previously mentioned) the turbo 4 will get way better gas mileage than a turbo 6. The Camaro will be getting a 4cyl as well.
Old 07-18-2014, 08:47 PM
  #24  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 413 Likes on 331 Posts

Default

I didn't think they were gonna get to 450hp like the rumors said. Good to see them squeeze a little more power out though. Now it has 5th gen weight. My buddies 1ss 5thgen weighed 3760 with 3/4 tank of gas. But you'll have that with more content. I didn't think the wishful thinking of some was gonna come true.

I like the car. Can't wait to see how the 6thgen counters. But I don't think the ford camp will be very happy when it does.
Old 07-18-2014, 08:50 PM
  #25  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What was that you said about wishful thinking...?
Old 07-18-2014, 11:07 PM
  #26  
H8R
Staging Lane
 
H8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Johnnystock
The more I think about it, Ford did great with the new mustang: 3700lbs with IRS is very respectable. Its more hp than the current Camaro and its lighter.

The Camaro wont be here till 2016 officially so it gives time Ford to wipe out the competition and then bump up the hp numbers when the LT1 Camaro hits the streets. Plus the gt350 or gt500 hp numbers will make headlines to make plp forget about the new Camaro performance.

At first I hated the look of the Mustang, but the silver GT with the track pack/black wheels I saw in the lastest motoman video looks ******* nice. The interior looks top notch too. Id be ready to purchase that Mustang. The rear end is gorgeous...
The weight is what made the 5th gen less competitive to the coyote ... If GM makes it within 100lbs of the mustang, the camaro will perform just as well. The LT1 Camaro should come in at about the same power but more useable power IMO.
Old 07-18-2014, 11:54 PM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Love it. I'll take 2 of them
Old 07-19-2014, 06:49 AM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
94FBIRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
Heaviest 4th gens were 3600lbs tops, maybe. Average was 3400-3500lbs, and if I remember right some of the stripped models were around 3300lbs.
3700lbs is what the GTO weighed.
Yep, both with a 1/2 tank of gas, my 98 Formula A4 was 3390. My 94 Formula A4 was 3470.
Old 07-19-2014, 08:55 AM
  #29  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 413 Likes on 331 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
What was that you said about wishful thinking...?
Not much wishing to it when the new lt makes 25 more hp and 60 more tq.
Originally Posted by H8R
The weight is what made the 5th gen less competitive to the coyote ... If GM makes it within 100lbs of the mustang, the camaro will perform just as well. The LT1 Camaro should come in at about the same power but more useable power IMO.
The lt1 has more power now. It could get a small upgrade in the next couple years also. It usually goes like that. I look for the 6gen camaro to be lighter. It won't be built on a full size sedan platform. Could be wish full thinking. ....... but the ats is lighter than a 5gen and a Camaro with less content should be lighter that a ats.
Originally Posted by 94FBIRD
Yep, both with a 1/2 tank of gas, my 98 Formula A4 was 3390. My 94 Formula A4 was 3470.
My Camaro ss weighed 3430 stock.
Old 07-19-2014, 09:15 AM
  #30  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Not much wishing to it when the new lt makes 25 more hp and 60 more tq.

The lt1 has more power now. It could get a small upgrade in the next couple years also. It usually goes like that. I look for the 6gen camaro to be lighter. It won't be built on a full size sedan platform. Could be wish full thinking. ....... but the ats is lighter than a 5gen and a Camaro with less content should be lighter that a ats.


My Camaro ss weighed 3430 stock.
It's going to the Alpha platform, but there are two variations of that platform...one of them is the new CTS.
Old 07-19-2014, 09:08 PM
  #31  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
SparkyJJO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,195
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I'm seeing the 2014 CTS at 3800 pounds for the middle of the road one. Sure, if you get the 3.6L twin turbo Vsport premium you're pushing 4000 pounds, but the Camaro won't have all that extra stuff on it.

A 2014 Camaro 2SS is 3900 pounds.

So even if the 6th gen goes on the CTS chassis, it is highly doubtful that it will add weight to the car. So, yeah, Ford has pushed the Mustang nearly into 5th gen Camaro weight territory, and the rumors are still the Camaro losing a little weight.

I suspect that they both will end up in the same weight ballpark. Mustang gained some, Camaro likely will lose some, bang, 3700-ish pounds for both. Should keep it interesting
Old 07-19-2014, 09:24 PM
  #32  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SparkyJJO
I'm seeing the 2014 CTS at 3800 pounds for the middle of the road one. Sure, if you get the 3.6L twin turbo Vsport premium you're pushing 4000 pounds, but the Camaro won't have all that extra stuff on it.

A 2014 Camaro 2SS is 3900 pounds.

So even if the 6th gen goes on the CTS chassis, it is highly doubtful that it will add weight to the car. So, yeah, Ford has pushed the Mustang nearly into 5th gen Camaro weight territory, and the rumors are still the Camaro losing a little weight.

I suspect that they both will end up in the same weight ballpark. Mustang gained some, Camaro likely will lose some, bang, 3700-ish pounds for both. Should keep it interesting
FYI my 1SS 1LE weights 3780lbs stock and now its 3680lbs with minor weight reduction. 3900 is a stretch.
Old 07-19-2014, 09:44 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
427zm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 'WHEELS'
Isn't that about what a 4th gen weighs?

**** it.. This car is promising so let's find things to complain about it, too. Just like the hellcat.
Lol!

Car looks great IMO. It's interesting how neither the Ecoboost or the 5.0 have forged pistons. The hyper pistons must be a big need (b/c they expand quicker) for compete sealing in the combustion chamber for emissions.
Old 07-20-2014, 12:45 PM
  #34  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 427zm
Lol!

Car looks great IMO. It's interesting how neither the Ecoboost or the 5.0 have forged pistons. The hyper pistons must be a big need (b/c they expand quicker) for compete sealing in the combustion chamber for emissions.
The pistons were never really the issue with the modular motors, at least not at the power levels that Ford intends to run them at. The rods were always the weakest link, and those (as well as the crank) are forged in both those motors.
Old 07-20-2014, 02:08 PM
  #35  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
SparkyJJO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,195
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Johnnystock
FYI my 1SS 1LE weights 3780lbs stock and now its 3680lbs with minor weight reduction. 3900 is a stretch.
I was pulling info off the offical GM spec page for a 2SS. Not sure what all extra the 2SS has over a 1SS as far as weight. Maybe just "worst case."
Old 07-20-2014, 02:11 PM
  #36  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If we're gonna compare weights, we gotta compare manufacturer published weights. For all we know, you might be able to get a 3,600lb "stripper" '15 GT. It was either Evan or ohioborn who has a friend with a ~3,400lb 5.0, and nobody really knows why it's that light.
Old 07-20-2014, 04:59 PM
  #37  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sickness7
I think they are trying to bring back the "SVO"
if they have half a brain they WILL bring back a real SVO. 500hp turbo 4 with 3100 lb weight. its all there if they will just do it.


BTW hypereutectic pistons are 30 percent stronger than cast, the average non 2618 forging is 50 percent stronger. if detonation is avoided a hyper piston can handle just about anything thrown at it. I use CP 2618 in the 76mm turbo.
Old 07-21-2014, 02:58 PM
  #38  
TECH Addict
 
It'llrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Considering CAFE, the 2.3L is a better choice than the 3.5L and if they want, that power can easily be bumped. The next Camaro will have what is currently a slightly less powerful 4cyl, so Ford has done fine w/ this choice.

The V6 is likely the exact same engine as current, but rated lower to help promote the 4cyl. Since the car is heavier, that one will "suffer" a little as compared to current.

The GT power is "only" up 15, which is exactly what I predicted for various reasons. 435 is plenty of power! I'd be a little surprised if this new one got the power down well enough to outrun the 14 in a 1/4 mile, but it will be close either way... a draw is about as good as I'd expect. That said, this car will positively annihilate the 14 on road courses, I'm sure.

The 16 Camaro will be competition for the new Mustang and I still expect them to be almost a dead match. The Camaro may have 1 problem... the larger Alpha chassis. If Camaro weighs as much or less than Mustang... and gets the LT1 at Corvette level(or even close, frankly), it will easily be quicker if both put the power down w/ traction. A road course may be a bit trickier, depending on weight distribution and braking capabilities(both should be great).

The only real question I still have is, what power will the 2016 Mustang get? My bet today would be that Ford will bump it another 15, but it won't likely gain any torque. The only thing that really matters now or for 16 is the power band and how well the package comes together in gearing to help it stay where it needs to be... the LS and LT don't have any concern there, but the 5L definitely does.
Old 07-22-2014, 04:53 PM
  #39  
Launching!
 
MI-Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Next bump in power for the 5.0 will probably come from DI. Has Ford announced when the 5.0 will be getting DI yet? I figured it would for the 2015 release.
Old 07-22-2014, 05:16 PM
  #40  
TECH Addict
 
It'llrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

There's been plenty of chatter before now, but none lately, that Ford may simply never go DI with the Mustang... weird. I'd expect 15hp more for 16, but if they do DI, I'd expect to see more like 30. They're never looking to set the record for the Mustang GT or lower models, so I just don't expect much. If they use DI, that's going to make many people happy, but it will be another added expense.


Quick Reply: Official - 2015 Ford Mustang Specs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 PM.