Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

05 Stang Specs/Comparisons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2004 | 11:12 AM
  #21  
ActionJack's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Not 4 dr, a 2 dr 5th gen with interesting options.

On the Zeta? Looking like a G6 with a V8?

GM would have to do something different than the current GTO to get most of the pony car fans. And, it would be great if they built it in the USA. There are not too many cars built here any longer. Even an F-Body built in Canada was better than overseas IMHO.


So sad.
Old 09-27-2004 | 09:22 PM
  #22  
TriShield's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Default

Originally Posted by ActionJack
On the Zeta? Looking like a G6 with a V8?

GM would have to do something different than the current GTO to get most of the pony car fans. And, it would be great if they built it in the USA. There are not too many cars built here any longer. Even an F-Body built in Canada was better than overseas IMHO.


So sad.
The GTO has never been a pony car. If you prefer your muscle pony style, it will never be the car for you.

If you want a brand new pony car, buy a Mustang. Have fun knowing it's built on a foreign engineered structure (Jag S-Type), that the chief engineer who oversaw the project is Vietnamese, and it's built in a Mazda plant.

The Zeta is also 100% Australian engineered, as you probably already know.

Oh noes!1 So SaD1 Awfulness!
Old 09-27-2004 | 11:52 PM
  #23  
GQ's Avatar
GQ
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: okc
Default

the 33XX is refering to the '04, not the '05. An 04 gt does not roll out of the factory at 3100 lbs... -g
Old 09-28-2004 | 12:45 AM
  #24  
LS1LT1's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,330
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by G's99_hawk
the '04 gt is more like ~3300 lbs.
Yeah, or even heavier as also stated above, I think that 3113 pound spec in the first post is a misprint or something.
The '05 might actually come in a little lighter than that 3400 pound+ depending on options, it does have an alloy block at least.
Old 09-28-2004 | 12:51 AM
  #25  
LS1LT1's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,330
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ActionJack
And, it would be great if they built it in the USA. There are not too many cars built here any longer. Even an F-Body built in Canada was better than overseas IMHO.
Agreed.



Originally Posted by TriShield
If you want a brand new pony car, buy a Mustang. Have fun knowing it's built on a foreign engineered structure (Jag S-Type), that the chief engineer who oversaw the project is Vietnamese, and it's built in a Mazda plant.
Well, the S Type platform has also been shared with (and was codesigned with) the Lincoln LS series from the beginning as well don't forget.
And is it actually a Mazda plant, I thought it was a fully Ford owned former Mazda plant (Ford as I'm sure you know owns a good portion of Mazda) maybe?
Old 09-28-2004 | 03:17 PM
  #26  
ZigZagZ's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 333
Likes: 1
From: Jefferson, LA
Default

Originally Posted by LS1LT1
Yeah, or even heavier as also stated above, I think that 3113 pound spec in the first post is a misprint or something.
The '05 might actually come in a little lighter than that 3400 pound+ depending on options, it does have an alloy block at least.
Road & Track listed the weight of the '05 over 3,400 pounds. Kind of heavy when compared to the previous models.
Old 09-28-2004 | 06:08 PM
  #27  
LS1LT1's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,330
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ZigZagZ
Road & Track listed the weight of the '05 over 3,400 pounds. Kind of heavy when compared to the previous models.
I know but it's sometimes hard to judge by car magazine numbers, I've seen their weights calculated with all the test equipment on board, a driver in some cases, full tank of fuel etc.
I'm sure a lower optioned, manual trans GT will come in under 3400 without driver, but probably not by much.
Old 09-29-2004 | 10:07 AM
  #28  
ActionJack's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

3400 lbs does not seem so bad. If you want I am sure it can be put on a diet.

The new Mustang has the style I want and I cannot help but feel some nostalgia when I see one. I hope to see a bigger power plant for 2006 though.
Old 09-29-2004 | 10:31 PM
  #29  
Gloveperson's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ActionJack
3400 lbs does not seem so bad. If you want I am sure it can be put on a diet.

The new Mustang has the style I want and I cannot help but feel some nostalgia when I see one. I hope to see a bigger power plant for 2006 though.
3400 lbs isnt that bad when you come with 50 more horespower like us, but not for them. I think this car was more of a disapoitment to me than the styling of the GTO. It's a 2v non-pushrod for pete's sake! The car will only get heavier with the different cars (Except the cobra, rumors are going how it will have the same power as the last, but with less weight than the GT). I see the Mach 1/Bullit weighing like 3700

-Todd
Old 09-30-2004 | 02:04 AM
  #30  
LS1LT1's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,330
Likes: 0
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by Gloveperson
It's a 2v non-pushrod for pete's sake! The car will only get heavier with the different cars (Except the cobra, rumors are going how it will have the same power as the last, but with less weight than the GT). I see the Mach 1/Bullit weighing like 3700
It's a 3 valve actually.
And while I do see the other models (Mach 1 etc, if they ever actually make those versions that is) weighing a little bit more I doubt it will be that much more. And on the flipside of that, I have a hard time seeing how a Cobra version with more cams/valves and blower/intercooler/plumbing can weigh any less than 3400.
Old 09-30-2004 | 10:08 AM
  #31  
ActionJack's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

I would like to see the BOSS model made.

If these Stangs prove themselves I am planning on one in 2007.
Old 09-30-2004 | 10:28 AM
  #32  
Gloveperson's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LS1LT1
It's a 3 valve actually.
And while I do see the other models (Mach 1 etc, if they ever actually make those versions that is) weighing a little bit more I doubt it will be that much more. And on the flipside of that, I have a hard time seeing how a Cobra version with more cams/valves and blower/intercooler/plumbing can weigh any less than 3400.
Ok, well it still isn't a DOHC/Pushrod right

From what I understand about the next cobra, it will be a lot like the old Cobra R's and the street version of the fast mustang will be the boss/mach/bullit/shelby

-Todd
Old 09-30-2004 | 01:21 PM
  #33  
slow's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,150
Likes: 1
From: Orlando
Default

The 2005 stang is nice.

Sure isn't a ls1 putting around 245 to the tires stock.

Ryan
Old 09-30-2004 | 02:07 PM
  #34  
ActionJack's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by slow
The 2005 stang is nice.

Sure isn't a ls1 putting around 245 to the tires stock.

Ryan

I miss not having new F-Body LS1s
Old 10-01-2004 | 12:48 AM
  #35  
WECIV's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
From: Gulf Shores and DC
Default

I heard they were putting down 275.
Old 10-03-2004 | 01:59 AM
  #36  
Gloveperson's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WECIV
I heard they were putting down 275.
I think Saleen put that number done. That makes about 310 RWHP I think.

Edmunds.com drove one, here is their first drive:

http://www.edmunds.com/new/2005/ford...irstdrive.1g.*

-Todd
Old 10-03-2004 | 07:01 PM
  #37  
WECIV's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
From: Gulf Shores and DC
Default

I am starting to warm to it. Especially with what MT says it runs.
Old 10-03-2004 | 07:06 PM
  #38  
Gloveperson's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WECIV
I am starting to warm to it. Especially with what MT says it runs.
At 99 mph

My LT1 was faster than it!

-Todd
Old 10-03-2004 | 09:07 PM
  #39  
WECIV's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
From: Gulf Shores and DC
Default

MT says that the 4th and 5th gear are flat worthless. Thus, with different gears it should be able to run.
Old 10-03-2004 | 09:09 PM
  #40  
Gloveperson's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WECIV
MT says that the 4th and 5th gear are flat worthless. Thus, with different gears it should be able to run.
And with different gears in an LT1????

-Todd


Quick Reply: 05 Stang Specs/Comparisons



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 PM.