SHELBY "SUPER SNAKE" 725HP
05-03-2007, 12:09 AM
#21
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nah the SS cobra was also out back in the day with that SS tag, wasn't it? late 60's? thought i saw one on barrett-jackson not too long ago.
wait, unless you mean chevrolet took the SS badge first. did they?
wait, unless you mean chevrolet took the SS badge first. did they?
05-03-2007, 04:59 PM
#24
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kaos_
nah the SS cobra was also out back in the day with that SS tag, wasn't it? late 60's? thought i saw one on barrett-jackson not too long ago.
wait, unless you mean chevrolet took the SS badge first. did they?
wait, unless you mean chevrolet took the SS badge first. did they?
11-10-2007, 11:04 PM
#26
On The Tree
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jasper, Indiana
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I read that article in the latest Road & Track under the heading "better then a Viper or Vette?"
The times they got were 0-60 in 4.4 secs, 1/4 mile in 12.5, and a top speed of 150. Sounds like a slightly modified LS1 numbers to me, but what do i know, my car is "slow".
11-11-2007, 01:05 PM
#27
TECH Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, considering dealerships were marking up some GT500's well above 80k... expect a whole lot more for show room floor 725HP.
And the camaro/mustang discussion...I bought a Camaro because the stock 5.7L is > 4.7L, and you can't dispute that. In comparison to my Z, the '00 GT is a tank with horrible interior. That's just one man's opinion though...having owned both.
And the camaro/mustang discussion...I bought a Camaro because the stock 5.7L is > 4.7L, and you can't dispute that. In comparison to my Z, the '00 GT is a tank with horrible interior. That's just one man's opinion though...having owned both.
