Cadillac CTS-V 2004-2007 (Gen I) The Caddy with an Attitude...

Got tuned today....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2010, 05:20 AM
  #21  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
maxspeed05V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

headers and cats are only holding you back 10 maybe 15 hp tops.

If you want more hp swap in a bigger cam.
Old 05-14-2010, 09:09 AM
  #22  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,245
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

You guys really don't realize how restrictive the manifolds and cats are on a CTS-V. Plus, the stock flywheel is super heavy which also drops the numbers. Compared to an F-body with a lighter flywheel, a lighter driveshaft, lighter wheels, an underdrive pulley and a much more dyno-friendly rear end, the CTS-V is at a fairly large chassis dyno disadvantage.

I'm not making excuses, but even on the same dyno where James Day made 430 in his wife's Camaro, the V's dyno a lot less (because of all the things mentioned above). It's one thing to make comparisons from one dyno to another, but it's even more difficult when making comparisons across vehicle platforms.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Old 05-14-2010, 11:00 AM
  #23  
On The Tree
 
Jon04CTSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ahh, well that makes sense
Old 05-14-2010, 02:28 PM
  #24  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
maxspeed05V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

even with the extra drivetrain loss on the V it should still make more or at least the same power as a f-body because of the better heads.
Old 05-14-2010, 03:13 PM
  #25  
On The Tree
 
Jon04CTSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I guess we'll see when mine goes in... I'll be very disappointed if I'm at 380...

And that F-bod had a LS6 long block dropped into it, so I'm guessing it would have had the same heads.
Old 05-14-2010, 03:54 PM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
You guys really don't realize how restrictive the manifolds and cats are on a CTS-V. Plus, the stock flywheel is super heavy which also drops the numbers. Compared to an F-body with a lighter flywheel, a lighter driveshaft, lighter wheels, an underdrive pulley and a much more dyno-friendly rear end, the CTS-V is at a fairly large chassis dyno disadvantage.

I'm not making excuses, but even on the same dyno where James Day made 430 in his wife's Camaro, the V's dyno a lot less (because of all the things mentioned above). It's one thing to make comparisons from one dyno to another, but it's even more difficult when making comparisons across vehicle platforms.
Take look at my thread 05 v dyno numbers. a c5zo6 dynoed 10 minuted after mine came off the dyno and put down 22more hp then my V with the SAME exact mods, identical cam and all but has a ported throttle body and 25% u/d pulley whi ch i dont, so id say were giving about 10hp more drivetrain loss at most.....not as much as youd think.

I also picked up 22rwhp(shop dynoed my car before they threw the cam in) from kooks 1 7/8 before the cam so maxspeed id have to disagree with you on 10-15. and that was with high flow cats as well, off road pipes id expect about 25.
Old 05-14-2010, 04:16 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
 
whisler151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by itsslow98
I also picked up 22rwhp(shop dynoed my car before they threw the cam in) from kooks 1 7/8 before the cam so maxspeed id have to disagree with you on 10-15. and that was with high flow cats as well, off road pipes id expect about 25.
Remember, his cam is pretty small. He may not gain that much with the headers.
Old 05-14-2010, 04:18 PM
  #28  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
maxspeed05V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by whisler151
Remember, his cam is pretty small. He may not gain that much with the headers.
yup thats exactly what I said on the other forum. If anyone remebers my first baby cam I made 360hp, then with headers I made 374 which isnt that much of a differance.
Old 05-14-2010, 04:28 PM
  #29  
On The Tree
 
Jon04CTSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by maxspeed05V
yup thats exactly what I said on the other forum. If anyone remebers my first baby cam I made 360hp, then with headers I made 374 which isnt that much of a differance.
Specs on that cam? I dynoed 360 with headers. If that's the case I'm not gonna install the cam for 14rwhp.
Old 05-14-2010, 04:42 PM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
 
whisler151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jon04CTSV
Specs on that cam? I dynoed 360 with headers. If that's the case I'm not gonna install the cam for 14rwhp.
If you are 360 now I would guess 380 with your cam...maybe 385 on a good day.
Old 05-14-2010, 06:55 PM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
DoesSpeedTurnUon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Little Elm, TX
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My header only tuned car made 362rwhp. Headers is where its at. And my most fun mod thus far.
Old 05-14-2010, 07:08 PM
  #32  
On The Tree
 
Jon04CTSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by whisler151
If you are 360 now I would guess 380 with your cam...maybe 385 on a good day.
lol in that case I'm selling the cam when it gets here.
Old 05-14-2010, 07:41 PM
  #33  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
maxspeed05V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jon04CTSV
Specs on that cam? I dynoed 360 with headers. If that's the case I'm not gonna install the cam for 14rwhp.
you cant compare my dyno numbers with yours because they are totaly diffrent dynos . All you could compare is gains over stock on the same car, same dyno.

And my car only gained 15 hp from headers.

If yours made 360 then congrates, but all it means is without headers your baseline was high , maybe 345 .
Old 05-14-2010, 08:08 PM
  #34  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Very true i baselined 343 but that was with muffler delete and CAI tuned. I did 365 with headers and the mods above. Then 400 with the cam.
Old 05-14-2010, 08:16 PM
  #35  
TECH Regular
 
AWDTBSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if ur not gonna install the cam for 14whp then theres really no other mods worth doing then HP wise
Old 05-14-2010, 08:17 PM
  #36  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
1bad2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by itsslow98
^^^not a ton with that cam, id say hes leaving about 15 on the table without headers. But the more he does the more hell suffer.

what rpm did the power peak at? 6300-6400?
LOL unfortunately thats about all the cam gave him. So I would say that is a worth while amount.
Old 05-14-2010, 08:35 PM
  #37  
TECH Fanatic
 
whisler151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
You guys really don't realize how restrictive the manifolds and cats are on a CTS-V. Plus, the stock flywheel is super heavy which also drops the numbers.
That's why I went with Kooks and Monster clutch with 18lb flywheel.

Originally Posted by Jon04CTSV
lol in that case I'm selling the cam when it gets here.
Seriously, if you want to hit 400 get a bigger cam. You can still pass emissions, I do every year. You will be disappointed with your cam. I know I would be if I was cammed and below 400.
Old 05-14-2010, 09:29 PM
  #38  
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
2manycars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Austin, TX via Pottstown,PA
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by whisler151
Damn, maybe I am an expert.

Sorry you didnt get the numbers you were looking for. I said the same thing when I got my cam and my wife said it 6 months after she got implants..."I should have gone bigger".
I'm surprised no one said this yet...


Pics of said implants or expert status is re-nagged and a permanent ban!
Old 05-14-2010, 09:31 PM
  #39  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,245
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

You can't go to a bigger cam while still running manifolds. The gains will not be very big. You'd have too much overlap and exhaust reversion would be contaminating the intake charge. You need to let a cammed motor breathe. For the guy who gained 25 with headers, remember, his gains were with a stock LS6 cam. Run a cam like the 222/226 .597/.598 115LSA cam and you will gain over 30 with headers. The bigger the cam, typically the bigger the gains by running headers.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Old 05-14-2010, 11:41 PM
  #40  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

your still not gonna make 400 with headers and the cam the OP has. maybe 380-385.


Quick Reply: Got tuned today....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 PM.