So... I'm supposed to race a Mach 1 tonight...
maybe they went to grab a bite somewhere after they've raced? xD 
07-09-2011, 04:16 AM
#66
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2nd gear roll, 40mph to 4th gear 6,800rpm. He honked it and hit it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dhg_E...e_gdata_player
3rd gear 70mph roll to 4th gear 6,800rpm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDd8r...e_gdata_player
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dhg_E...e_gdata_player
3rd gear 70mph roll to 4th gear 6,800rpm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDd8r...e_gdata_player
07-09-2011, 06:28 AM
#72
Looked like fun! I'm not doggin the forum at all for this, but I'm surprised to see that they allow street racing postings like this. I used to be a Mustang guy (it looked nice and sounded good, but about as fast as a 91 Prelude....LOL) and I was a member on about 5 different Mustang forums. None would allow any posts related to street racing, it was basically instantly closed/deleted.
Anyway, OP, your car has peaked my interest in cammnig. From what I see in your sig, you haven't done any head/intake work besides pushrods and valve springs, right? Were those necessary, or can a cam be tossed in there with a tune and headers and be safe/reliable? Also, mind me asking what I could expect to spend for something similar to what you've got? I'd love to get to a 'real' (wheel) 400 hp without having to maggie her...
Anyway, OP, your car has peaked my interest in cammnig. From what I see in your sig, you haven't done any head/intake work besides pushrods and valve springs, right? Were those necessary, or can a cam be tossed in there with a tune and headers and be safe/reliable? Also, mind me asking what I could expect to spend for something similar to what you've got? I'd love to get to a 'real' (wheel) 400 hp without having to maggie her...
07-09-2011, 07:53 AM
#73
On The Tree
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: PA and NJ
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
typical mustang owners...(roll the eyes)
the best was pre-SVT development team morons (2002) when ford just could not get it together and severely over-rated their engines...
1996 cobra - rated 305 - dynoed 254 - overrated
1999 TA - rated 320 - dynoed 302. - underrated
it was never close...
then they decided svt 'fire everyone in 2002' and hired a bunch of new guys lets do a 2003 ... cobra . forge everything, we dont know what we are doing, throw a blower on there.. do all we can to finally beat something...
yet the sales flock to the ford anyways... i dont know..
...
the best was pre-SVT development team morons (2002) when ford just could not get it together and severely over-rated their engines...
1996 cobra - rated 305 - dynoed 254 - overrated
1999 TA - rated 320 - dynoed 302. - underrated
it was never close...
then they decided svt 'fire everyone in 2002' and hired a bunch of new guys lets do a 2003 ... cobra . forge everything, we dont know what we are doing, throw a blower on there.. do all we can to finally beat something...
yet the sales flock to the ford anyways... i dont know..
...
07-09-2011, 11:12 AM
#77
LOL, yea ok... which dyno run, which time slip or vid do you want? I have dozens... what did you think I did owning both? stare at them? I beat on both of them.
Or perhaps, You explain to everyone why there is no such thing as a 2002 SVT cobra?
Or are you saying the sales of ford wasnt huge?
Your a lie. lol
Or perhaps, You explain to everyone why there is no such thing as a 2002 SVT cobra?
Or are you saying the sales of ford wasnt huge?
Your a lie. lol
