Cadillac CTS-V 2004-2007 (Gen I) The Caddy with an Attitude...

New idea to stabilize rear cradle

Old 12-25-2012, 09:27 PM
  #21  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
FuzzyLog1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,305
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bowtie70SS
That's the stuff I was talking about, I never meant window weld someone else mentioned that.
I believe that Revshift's criticism was pointed at the entire family of polypropylene glycol prepolymers. Based on some informal reading at Dow, Wiley and Bayer, I'm not seeing anything that would even remotely suggest that this material would make a durable, long-lasting automotive bushing material. It just looks like bathroom/flooring caulk. To me, it just doesn't make sense to use something that was never designed to withstand mechanical stresses in application where harsh mechanical shock and vibration occurs constantly.

Last edited by FuzzyLog1c; 12-25-2012 at 09:43 PM.
Old 12-25-2012, 09:34 PM
  #22  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
Bowtie70SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah I read that and they were saying 2 part urethane is bad? If you look at the spec sheet it said something like 168hours till full strength. How is the other stuff cured? Moisture?
Old 12-25-2012, 09:50 PM
  #23  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
FuzzyLog1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,305
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bowtie70SS
Yeah I read that and they were saying 2 part urethane is bad? If you look at the spec sheet it said something like 168hours till full strength. How is the other stuff cured? Moisture?
That's an excellent question. I don't know the answer, and I can't find it yet. Presently, all I can say is that one advantage that a bushing fabricated in a factory or lab may have is that it is probably subjected to vacuum as it cures to remove air bubbles--both large and small.
Old 12-25-2012, 09:57 PM
  #24  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
Bowtie70SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah that is true, they do sell vacuum tables for making signs but the cost would never be worth it. If you were going make round bushings then you could buy round stock and turn them down in a lathe/machine them. I guess I get carried away trying to do and fabricate stuff myself. I have to make things a lot of times and get into the fabricator/builder mindset like hey I can do that. Its hard to know when to say when sometimes.
Old 12-25-2012, 10:03 PM
  #25  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Fuzzy_Wuzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 572
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

As long as the new material does not damage the stock rubber, even if it fails it will just revert to the stock bushings. If you want a weekend project that may or may not work give it a go. For the price i think the revshift bushings are a better bet. But I don't think your idea is all that bad. The trick will be finding the best material for the job.
Old 12-25-2012, 10:08 PM
  #26  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (14)
 
GulfM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cypress TX
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bowtie70SS
I guess I get carried away trying to do and fabricate stuff myself. I have to make things a lot of times and get into the fabricator/builder mindset like hey I can do that. Its hard to know when to say when sometimes.
If you're looking for something to fabricate, make a couple sets of aluminum subframe bushings. I'd love to try a set, my bmr bushings squeak and groan.

Old 12-25-2012, 10:11 PM
  #27  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Fuzzy_Wuzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 572
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bowtie70SS
Yeah that is true, they do sell vacuum tables for making signs but the cost would never be worth it. If you were going make round bushings then you could buy round stock and turn them down in a lathe/machine them. I guess I get carried away trying to do and fabricate stuff myself. I have to make things a lot of times and get into the fabricator/builder mindset like hey I can do that. Its hard to know when to say when sometimes.
The beauty if your method works is that you don't have to remove the stock bushings, which is the PITA step
Old 12-25-2012, 11:17 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Revshift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Everything Fuzzylog1c said in this thread is accurate, so far. There are many different specifications to consider. The 2-part urethane sealant is not adequate. This is why those black aftermarket cts-v motor mounts are starting to crumble apart. There is a thread on here with pictures of what I am referring to.

Originally Posted by Bowtie70SS
Yeah I read that and they were saying 2 part urethane is bad? If you look at the spec sheet it said something like 168hours till full strength. How is the other stuff cured? Moisture?
No two polyurethanes are the same. Our polyurethane (the good stuff) consists of 4 to 6 different chemicals mixed together in very specific ratios. It is extremely involving and there is a lot to it. Vacuum chambers, curing ovens, inert gases, and specially designed mixers are involved. I can't get into the specifics because there are a lot of trade secrets that I can not talk about (seriously).

Those delrin inserts are machined from solid stock. The delrin stock is expensive and this is why they are $300. If you were to buy polyurethane stock then you would be in the same predicament as with delrin. It is also expensive for the stock. Not to mention that you would not know the properties of the polyurethane stock (aside from hardness) because the suppliers do not offer it. I can tell you that the cheapest supplier that I know of offering solid polyurethane stock would charge around $200 plus shipping for the amount of material needed to make the cradle bushings. You could always contact us, we can make you some nice chunks of polyurethane for less than $200.
Old 12-25-2012, 11:40 PM
  #29  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
54inches's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cove, Texas
Posts: 2,062
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Revshift
No two polyurethanes are the same. Our polyurethane (the good stuff) consists of 4 to 6 different chemicals mixed together in very specific ratios. It is extremely involving and there is a lot to it. Vacuum chambers, curing ovens, inert gases, and specially designed mixers are involved. I can't get into the specifics because there are a lot of trade secrets that I can not talk about (seriously).
Don' forGet MAgIC.
Old 12-26-2012, 12:28 AM
  #30  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
swiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: TN
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by FuzzyLog1c
And for ages, it's been sucking. It's too soft (55-60A) and it's not durable enough. It's got a narrow temperature range and insufficient resistance to moisture.

If window weld shears during a turn and you lose control of the car, that $110 you "saved" is going to look pretty stupid next to your totaled CTS-V and medical bills.

http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawe...SevTSeSSSSSS--

http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawe...SevTSeSSSSSS--
To clarify, you feel that filling the voids in the stock cradle bushings would lead to a catastrophic failure?
Old 12-26-2012, 01:04 AM
  #31  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Cadzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Bowtie70SS
Sometimes ideas just come to you. Some are good and some are bad so I will bounce this one off the CTS-V community here. At work we use a compound to plug telephone cables which is basically a A/B urethane compound that hardens to for a air dam within the cable. Here is my idea; I looked on McMaster-Carr and I can order Shore 85A urethane casting compound for $33.33 for 25 cubic inches. What if I were to drop my cradle and build temporary forms around the cradle mount bushings and fill them with urethane? I cannot imagine why this wouldn't work. I don't want to hate on any products but $2-300 for spacers is a bit high. I am going to order some and give it a shot. I bet a piece of large exhaust tubing and some duct tape would make a nice form.

I did it. Spent $30 total I believe.

I shot some 3m window weld in the voids, let it dry in the same shape as the stock bushing, filed it down flat, then used the washers to sandwich it. With 2 washers it was way way too firm- so much so that all slack in the driveline whatsoever was sent upstream to the flywheel. The throttle response was great when you hammered it but in stop and go it was very hard to modulate...I came to the conclusion that there is slack in that cradle for a reason- to allow some of the movement of the diff and let you shift in peace. Ultimately I backed it down to one washer on top/bottom, and it was fine. Without having tried the aftermarket options, I feel it produced an adequate result with no add'l nvh.

I contemplated the spectres for many years, but I don't like how they and other aftermarket bushings basically fuse the cradle to the frame. The fill method kept those 2 parts (and vibrations) separate using the urethane as the buffer layer.

I know it may not the most effective solution but I was only looking to take out the side to side wiggle/slop in the rear end during relatively slow cornering, and it accomplished that nicely. I think the 3m stuff is 65a which was very similar to the stock rubber if not harder. If you're looking to eliminate wheel hop with cradle bushings, forget it.

I posted several of these pics before but I can't find the thread. sorry about the pic sizes. I've resized them using the photobucket editor, which works about 10% of the time.


sliced off the lips of existing bushings





templates







urethane dried but crude. I sanded them down nice and flat/uniform after these pics were taken





sandwiched with 2 washers. I eventually went to one, but never got more pics. You can see that the washers don't actually touch the cradle, but that urethane now fills the whole cradle void.



Old 12-26-2012, 06:56 AM
  #32  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
FuzzyLog1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,305
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by swiss
To clarify, you feel that filling the voids in the stock cradle bushings would lead to a catastrophic failure?
I assume that the original mount would hold (as best it can), but the filler material might suddenly split or shear under torsional strain caused by hard cornering (1.1G+). If that occurred, the rear subframe would suddenly shift, throwing the back end of the car wide. The natural reaction to that is going to be abruptly letting off the throttle, which may make the car want to swap ends.
Old 12-26-2012, 07:12 AM
  #33  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
Bowtie70SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well Cadzilla I guess my title "new idea" is blown out of the water. I guess the design difference of a solid rear axle and a independant are the reason the vibrations/harmonics are transferred. Cars with unit bodies have had their rear frame rails attached (welded) to the body/floors and rear suspensions mounted to them. Maybe 4 mounting points are not enough if you are trying to make a more solid connection to the car.
Old 12-26-2012, 11:48 AM
  #34  
TECH Enthusiast
 
etcts-v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Love the creativity of finding your own solutions, this is what makes the community on here so badass!

Personally a huge fan of RevShift mounts, affordable, durable and overall great company which is why I'll stick with their solution for the rear cradle. But that's just me.
Old 12-26-2012, 11:55 AM
  #35  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
FuzzyLog1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,305
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by etcts-v
Love the creativity of finding your own solutions, this is what makes the community on here so badass!

Personally a huge fan of RevShift mounts, affordable, durable and overall great company which is why I'll stick with their solution for the rear cradle. But that's just me.
Now, if we could only get them to develop a 8.8 kit that cost $2500...
Old 12-26-2012, 01:32 PM
  #36  
TECH Enthusiast
 
etcts-v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FuzzyLog1c
Now, if we could only get them to develop a 8.8 kit that cost $2500...
Amen!
Old 12-26-2012, 03:31 PM
  #37  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Cadzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by FuzzyLog1c
And for ages, it's been sucking. It's too soft (55-60A) and it's not durable enough. It's got a narrow temperature range and insufficient resistance to moisture.

If window weld shears during a turn and you lose control of the car, that $110 you "saved" is going to look pretty stupid next to your totaled CTS-V and medical bills.
have you even taken the cradle apart yet? With no bushings at all, it's still not going anywhere. The bolts hold the cradle to the frame. The (stock) bushings barely serve a purpose.
Originally Posted by FuzzyLog1c
I assume that the original mount would hold (as best it can), but the filler material might suddenly split or shear under torsional strain caused by hard cornering (1.1G+). If that occurred, the rear subframe would suddenly shift, throwing the back end of the car wide. The natural reaction to that is going to be abruptly letting off the throttle, which may make the car want to swap ends.
wrong, sorry..
Old 12-26-2012, 04:36 PM
  #38  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
FuzzyLog1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,305
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cadzilla
have you even taken the cradle apart yet? With no bushings at all, it's still not going anywhere. The bolts hold the cradle to the frame. The (stock) bushings barely serve a purpose.


wrong, sorry..
Then prove it. You saying "it isn't so" doesn't make it so.

And the glowing reviews of the Revshift bushings, post install, clearly indicate that replacing the stock bushings does something significant.
Old 12-26-2012, 04:58 PM
  #39  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Fuzzy_Wuzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 572
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FuzzyLog1c
I assume that the original mount would hold (as best it can), but the filler material might suddenly split or shear under torsional strain caused by hard cornering (1.1G+). If that occurred, the rear subframe would suddenly shift, throwing the back end of the car wide. The natural reaction to that is going to be abruptly letting off the throttle, which may make the car want to swap ends.
This would be the pin in the haystack case. Worst case the rear would shift maybe 1/2" (and i really doubt you would get all 4 filled materials to fail at once. If you cannot handle that I would recommend not driving your car so hard, I would expect more issues from dirty roads than filling stock bushings.

Are the Revshift bushings better - YES
Is filling the stock bushings bad - NO
Will it last - To be seen...
Is it better than the Revshift bushings - I Doubt it, especially since you still have the soft stock bushing in there.

I think all Cadzilla is saying is that the cradle will still be in the car, there is physical restraint besides the bushings.
Old 12-26-2012, 06:33 PM
  #40  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
FuzzyLog1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,305
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fuzzy_Wuzzy
This would be the pin in the haystack case. Worst case the rear would shift maybe 1/2" (and i really doubt you would get all 4 filled materials to fail at once. If you cannot handle that I would recommend not driving your car so hard, I would expect more issues from dirty roads than filling stock bushings.
Have you ever felt the stock bushings kick out sideways during a 1.10-1.20 G power turn? Happens to me two or three times per week on my drive to work when it's warm enough to get enough grip. The first couple of times it happened, I thought I had lost all traction in the rear end and let off on the throttle. The resulting weight shift almost put me in the ditch. Now that I know what to expect, it's only unnerving, not dangerous, but I wouldn't want to know that that situation might be lurking around the corner.

But maybe I'm just paranoid.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: New idea to stabilize rear cradle



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 AM.