AndyIsLost

iTrader: (1)

Should be much stronger, full bolt-on V here that put down 349rwhp on a mustang dyno.

MN_V

iTrader: (5)

A lot of misrepresented or confused information in this thread, let me clear this up.

The guys car is stock. Neither the crappy K&N filter/"CAI" or the catback exhaust do anything for performance.

Common dyno numbers stock are 330 +- 5hp on dynojets. He is right in line with this.

Unless you're having driveability issues I don't see any problems in the output of your car. If you want to see 360, get headers and the retune.

liqidvenom

iTrader: (2)

This...

54inches

iTrader: (4)

The most I have seen/read was 1 rwhp.

I think that would be 2nd to a new clutch. It is not always about the power adders, but the items we add that allow the power robbers! lol

yep, I was 359 with a new clutch, volante, tune and full exhaust past the exhaust manifolds.....with headers 379.......329 stock.....

odthetruth

iTrader: (4)

You're right. I was under the impression he had headers, in which case, it looked low.

He's on the money otherwise without headers.

WasTiSLine

Awesome. Thanks for help guys. My ignorance of dynos didn't help at all lol

Birdmantamu

^^^Yeah that's what I was thinking when I first read your mod list. A lot of people might get confused between an actual intake (like Fast102) or CAI which kind of helps other mods down the road. For now, your CAI is more of a sound mod.

As for future mods...headers + tune would probably add 20+hp but I agree with what 54 was saying about critical mods that don't add power.

I'd put motor mounts, diff bushing, tranny mount and shifter at top of the list. These will make your car drive more crisp with less clunk. The motor mounts alone made a huge difference in my car's throttle response. It's like it jumps when you give it gas now versus a slight lag previously.

Oh and WELCOME TO MOD HELL...

itsslow98

iTrader: (18)

My car made 343rwhp with a K&N CAI and tune. Your car seems right in line with that.

SERB Z06

iTrader: (6)

Please do not listen to this retard, your AF is not 'too lean', it looks like its around 13.7:1 which is optimal for an NA car.

Also, there is nothing wrong with ethanol in today's gas. If you want to be ignorant feel free to believe that.

In regard to your low power, it doesn't seem low to me at all. Your tuner should know in 1-2 pulls if it's pulling timing because of "bad" gas.

InfrareV

From what I can see the 13.7:1 was before the cam and presumably tune, I do believe that this is too lean even N/A and as you can see the tuner richened it up to 12.8:1.

Furthermore I would agree with that 12.8:1 is also too lean given the ethanol in today's gasoline. However I would almost guarantee the wideband was calibrated for a 14.7:1 stoich. Assuming this is true you're looking at 12.3-12.4:1 on E10, which looks good to me.

Agreed.

05RavenV

Bone stock 05 V dynojet at vengeance put down 335hp second run fluked in at 346hp no mods

54inches

iTrader: (4)

no it didnt

05RavenV

05RavenV

Gotta love YouTube and smart phones.

Phil'sC5vette

iTrader: (4)

20 RWHP from just tuning isn't bad.

Ryan95i4

dynojet vs mustang dyno

Also, you can make a stock V make 1000whp with enough setting manipulation, comparing numbers from different dynos is kind of pointless.


Or you could just have a tuesday car

05RavenV

[QUOTE=Ryan95i4;18327520]dynojet vs mustang dyno

Also, you can make a stock V make 1000whp with enough setting manipulation, comparing numbers from different dynos is kind of pointless

Agreed but this was a dyno day they slapped it on there and dynod it and I was simply stating what I made on a dynojet.