Canadian Members We never leave because we have The Beer Store

Can't pass e-test!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2009, 10:56 AM
  #21  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (4)
 
Mark99Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LETZRIDE
just a side note...does it make a difference for etests (good or bad) if you leave your cutout open? (assuming the cutout is place a little further back, like just over the axle area)
Technically they aren't supposed to test the car with an exhaust leak so they should say "no".

However, the test is in parts-per-million so the cutout won't do much.

Another trick is to turn off the closed loop monitoring and run the car in open loop. That way you have ultimate control over the amount of fuel going in...just have to be careful with how lean to run it or you will burn up the cats. You can also trigger the air pump to dump extra air in the exhaust (make sure to trigger the solenoid too). It's a little more involved, but if the cam is big enough it may be needed.

Mark
Old 10-07-2009, 03:29 PM
  #22  
TECH Apprentice
 
BBYZED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have a set of Kooks LT and catted y-pipe. The cats are small on them too, and they are not stopping much. I looked inside mine, and it's basically a roll of paper inside. I got the cat efficiency low code after installing, and mechanic says they aren't worth much.

I got the codes deleted, but in a couple years when it's close to e-test time again, I'll change them out to magnaflows.
Old 10-07-2009, 11:29 PM
  #23  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
LETZRIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Mark99Hawk
Technically they aren't supposed to test the car with an exhaust leak so they should say "no".

However, the test is in parts-per-million so the cutout won't do much.

Another trick is to turn off the closed loop monitoring and run the car in open loop. That way you have ultimate control over the amount of fuel going in...just have to be careful with how lean to run it or you will burn up the cats. You can also trigger the air pump to dump extra air in the exhaust (make sure to trigger the solenoid too). It's a little more involved, but if the cam is big enough it may be needed.

Mark
Good info, I'll keep this in mind when I go sometime next week...will they let you sit in the car with Hp tuners plugged in while they run the test do you think? I know you only get 3 times to be tested before you HAVE to begin repairing stuff...My cat and all my O2's are brand new...so are the spark plugs and stuff...I'm not going to start replacing new stuff, with new stuff...I know if I fail it will definetly be due to the tune I am running...so I would like scans of each run...think they might have an issue with that?
Old 10-08-2009, 10:16 PM
  #24  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
elias_799's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: toronto ontario canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i passed e test with no cat and 10 pounds of boost
Old 10-20-2009, 09:58 PM
  #25  
SS7
Teching In
 
SS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: GTA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just failed NOx on pretty much stock Z28 everything else passed with flying numbers. Everywhere I look at, people have different limits for NOx numbers, is it predetermined for each car specifically? Funny part is all I did this summer was get CAI, replaced cat with Magnaflow and flushed/changed coolant...



Originally Posted by 91ZLS6

ASM Test
HC ppm - 18 - 242max
CO% - 0.03 - 1.92max
NO ppm - 169 - 2520max

Hot rod standards are listed. its about 35% higher then 97 standards, but you cans ee it would have passed with flying colours either way.
Wow, even after 35% thats a high accepted number of NOx comparing to what I had, I would have passed...

Are my NOx really high? Or did the local shop just ripped me off? And any suggestion to reduce the NOx?

Thanks in advance!
Old 10-21-2009, 11:50 AM
  #26  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
LETZRIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

that seems like a low limit...I just passed mine and I had a limit of I believe 436 (I read 429)...either way though your putting out 574 and that seems pretty high...
Old 10-21-2009, 02:48 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
bikesnbirds's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by beaSSt
Bikesnbirds

thanks for the info -- you wouldn't happen to have P/N?

regards
Sorry, just checked back on this thread. Magnaflow pn is 59959, 3" in/out

Steve
Old 10-21-2009, 02:51 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
bikesnbirds's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SS7
I just failed NOx on pretty much stock Z28 everything else passed with flying numbers. Everywhere I look at, people have different limits for NOx numbers, is it predetermined for each car specifically? Funny part is all I did this summer was get CAI, replaced cat with Magnaflow and flushed/changed coolant...





Wow, even after 35% thats a high accepted number of NOx comparing to what I had, I would have passed...

Are my NOx really high? Or did the local shop just ripped me off? And any suggestion to reduce the NOx?

Thanks in advance!
That may have been the 80 numbers for hotrod status that he posted. I know he tested under that but actually passed the 97 numbers too.

Steve
Old 10-21-2009, 03:33 PM
  #29  
TECH Apprentice
 
BBYZED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SS7
I just failed NOx on pretty much stock Z28 everything else passed with flying numbers. Everywhere I look at, people have different limits for NOx numbers, is it predetermined for each car specifically? Funny part is all I did this summer was get CAI, replaced cat with Magnaflow and flushed/changed coolant...





Wow, even after 35% thats a high accepted number of NOx comparing to what I had, I would have passed...

Are my NOx really high? Or did the local shop just ripped me off? And any suggestion to reduce the NOx?

Thanks in advance!
When I received headers this summer that didn't have the EGR attachment, I asked my mechanic about removing the EGR system. He informed me that removing the EGR would substantially increase my NOx emissions. You can check that there are no leaks, kinks, breaks etc in your EGR system....

I'm kind of shocked that no code has shown up. Changing the cats would have an impact on the emissions too.
Old 10-21-2009, 07:45 PM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NHRAMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver,[KITSILANO].B.C. Canada *WestCoast*
Posts: 8,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Running high octane gas will make it EASIER to pass the sniffer....NOT lower octane.
Old 10-21-2009, 08:30 PM
  #31  
SS7
Teching In
 
SS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: GTA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks to all who replied to my post.

I never put anything lower than 91 into my car, and usually try to put 94 as much as I can.

Few things I forgot to mention is that my car has been known to get hot while idling, and I had no time to figure out what it is. I did the whole coolant drain/flush/fill and 160 tstat this summer hoping it would fix it, but it didnt. So I thought being hot would be a good thing for combustion efficiency, but then after some research today I found out that high temps can cause high NOx output. I had the heater on the lowest setting, keeping the temp at 3/4 or maybe a little above of the temp range.

Another thing is that the car has been sitting for maybe 10 days-2 weeks prior to test, I went for a quick drive before though, got on WOT couple of times too.

And lastly when doing coolant flush/drain I took out the block plug and knock sensor. I sort of eyeballed the knock sensor when putting it back in, when I heard it has to be torqued to specifications otherwise it would affect the timing?

Any further advice, suggestions would be of great help.

Thanks again.
Old 10-21-2009, 09:36 PM
  #32  
TECH Addict
 
SladeX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

NOX is a function of high combustion chamber temps. The EGR lowers this by injecting exhaust back into the intake stream. Exhaust gasses don't burn again. This can lower combustion chamber temps significantly and also curbs pre-detonation allowing higher timing during long cruise periods.

The only problem, combined with a shitty PCV system that spits oil into the intake, this pretty much cakes the intake tract.

Running the proper octane will help emissions. 91 or better, our compression needs it. Low octane forces the low octane table to be triggered due to detonation. The low octane table is a fail zone meaning its not optimized for efficiency rather for saving your engine. 94 does nothing for your emissions unless your car is tuned for it.

Your goal is either to lower combustion chamber temps. You can either make sure it doesn't overheat or get close to such a condition. 196F is basically the optimal temp for emissions with your coolant. You can fix the egr which would solve it all. If you lower your coolant temps, HC goes up. You have a good hc reading, so you have some leeway.
Old 10-22-2009, 09:53 AM
  #33  
SS7
Teching In
 
SS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: GTA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SladeX
NOX is a function of high combustion chamber temps. The EGR lowers this by injecting exhaust back into the intake stream. Exhaust gasses don't burn again. This can lower combustion chamber temps significantly and also curbs pre-detonation allowing higher timing during long cruise periods.

The only problem, combined with a shitty PCV system that spits oil into the intake, this pretty much cakes the intake tract.

Running the proper octane will help emissions. 91 or better, our compression needs it. Low octane forces the low octane table to be triggered due to detonation. The low octane table is a fail zone meaning its not optimized for efficiency rather for saving your engine. 94 does nothing for your emissions unless your car is tuned for it.

Your goal is either to lower combustion chamber temps. You can either make sure it doesn't overheat or get close to such a condition. 196F is basically the optimal temp for emissions with your coolant. You can fix the egr which would solve it all. If you lower your coolant temps, HC goes up. You have a good hc reading, so you have some leeway.
Thanks, I am gonna give it another shot soon an try to do it when car is cooler.

Also I was thinking about seafoaming and then using that "Guaranteed to pass" additive from crappy tire, would that improve anything...?

If everything fails, I guess I'll try replacing EGR, found one shipped from US for 115$. Wonder what the labor would be... it must be a pita in that tight space.
Old 10-22-2009, 10:33 AM
  #34  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
LETZRIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SS7
Thanks, I am gonna give it another shot soon an try to do it when car is cooler.

Also I was thinking about seafoaming and then using that "Guaranteed to pass" additive from crappy tire, would that improve anything...?

If everything fails, I guess I'll try replacing EGR, found one shipped from US for 115$. Wonder what the labor would be... it must be a pita in that tight space.
don't some of the LS1 cars not have an EGR...what are they doing to keep those temps down (or what was done from the factory) maybe you can try something along those lines, block off your egr so that it doesnt leak (if it is leaking) but leave it in place so it will pass the inspection part...
Old 10-22-2009, 11:43 AM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LETZRIDE
don't some of the LS1 cars not have an EGR...what are they doing to keep those temps down (or what was done from the factory) maybe you can try something along those lines, block off your egr so that it doesnt leak (if it is leaking) but leave it in place so it will pass the inspection part...
If you look on SS7's E-test sheet he has a 94 which is an LT1. They are back pressure sensing EGR valves. Put all the vacuum to it you want without back pressure in the exhaust the valve will not open. I went through the same thing when my LT1 was just bolt on's.
Old 10-22-2009, 02:24 PM
  #36  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
LETZRIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by flame
If you look on SS7's E-test sheet he has a 94 which is an LT1. They are back pressure sensing EGR valves. Put all the vacuum to it you want without back pressure in the exhaust the valve will not open. I went through the same thing when my LT1 was just bolt on's.
I understand he has an LT1...Im saying what makes those LS1's that dont have an egr pass emissions...maybe he can adapt whatever was done from the factory to his car, if it means he'll have to spend less then $115...I know I have to look further into this, because the holden lower intake manifold that I bought, does not have a spot for the EGR valve anywhere...so unless I make a custom way of getting it in there, I wont have one...and my NO ppm numbers were about 4-5 off from not passing...I'll have an EGR valve in the car, and it will "look" like it is hooked up...but that will just be for the MOE guys...
Old 10-23-2009, 11:52 AM
  #37  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LETZRIDE
I understand he has an LT1...Im saying what makes those LS1's that dont have an egr pass emissions...maybe he can adapt whatever was done from the factory to his car.
They changed the camshaft slightly and probably played with timing.
Old 10-25-2009, 03:43 PM
  #38  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (4)
 
Mark99Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just a thought - but do you have a 3-way cat on the car? Some of the aftermarket ones are only 2-way so they don't reduce NOX. Maybe if you put a 3-way cat on it, it would pass?

http://www.car-sound.com/04basics/04emission.asp

Just something to think about

Mark
Old 10-26-2009, 09:33 AM
  #39  
TECH Apprentice
 
Ape Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Grand Valley
Posts: 372
Received 53 Likes on 32 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mark99Hawk
Just a thought - but do you have a 3-way cat on the car? Some of the aftermarket ones are only 2-way so they don't reduce NOX. Maybe if you put a 3-way cat on it, it would pass?

http://www.car-sound.com/04basics/04emission.asp

Just something to think about

Mark

Took the words from my mouth Mark.
Old 11-02-2009, 07:42 AM
  #40  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
eb02z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 2,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NHRAMAN
Running high octane gas will make it EASIER to pass the sniffer....NOT lower octane.
Are you 100% sure on that? Higher octane=slower burn?


Quick Reply: Can't pass e-test!!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 AM.