Carbureted LSX Forum Carburetors | Carbed Intakes | Carb Tuning Tips for LSX Enthusiasts

Cant deside on cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2012, 01:42 PM
  #41  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 63 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 89gmcs15
Ok, so the smaller the ci the less lsa you want. But a larger ci engine is more forgiving to finding the sweet spot. I was thinkin if my cam is wrong for my engine id hate to see what the right cam will do cuz this thing is a monster!
I think what the engine builder demonstrated to me was that there is a relationship between the engine displacement and head flow and head volume to consider as well. Not just displacement, but displacement relative to head size.
Old 07-20-2012, 02:23 PM
  #42  
In-Zane Moderator
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

It is the operating RPM that determines everything along with the cubes. From there it makes the required head flow, compression, cam, ect. That is the way I has come to look at it.
Old 07-20-2012, 03:43 PM
  #43  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
topbrent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 280
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Broad strokes definitions, tighter LSA will generally yield a few important things.


- More Torque and More Horsepower throughout the useable RPM range. (Some call this peaky, others call this winning the race by being faster)
- Higher cranking compression. (earlier intake valve close)
- increased EGR effect, or intake draw velocity.
- Snappier feel.
- Rougher Idle
- Intolerance to exhaust backpressure
- Poor emissions
- Higher fuel consumption
Old 07-20-2012, 05:04 PM
  #44  
In-Zane Moderator
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

That pretty much sums it up. Although I get decent fuel economy and have seen some still pass emissions.
Old 07-20-2012, 05:22 PM
  #45  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 63 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by topbrent
Broad strokes definitions, tighter LSA will generally yield a few important things.


- More Torque and More Horsepower throughout the useable RPM range. (Some call this peaky, others call this winning the race by being faster)
- Higher cranking compression. (earlier intake valve close)
- increased EGR effect, or intake draw velocity.
- Snappier feel.
- Rougher Idle
- Intolerance to exhaust backpressure
- Poor emissions
- Higher fuel consumption
I agree with everything except for:
- More Torque and More Horsepower throughout the useable RPM range.
- Snappier feel.

I think it is pretty well accepted that narrower LSA cams generally have a narrower power band. The power tends to be more concentrated in a narrower RPM range but more average power in that range. Wider LSA cams tend to have a wider flatter power band.

In fact, back in the day when Crower Cams had a truly huge catalog of racing cams, they generally recommended wider LSA cams for stick shift drag cars than automatics because they were in touch with the fact that high stall converters allowed drag cars to function in a very narrow RPM range where stick shifts required a wider flatter powerband to maintain a good average HP.

As for the snappier feel, I have never noticed this correlation.

The funny thing with all of our combined experience is that we can get in the ball park with what we think will work, but nothing beats seeing combination with our specific engines in similar vehicles. That information is golden and that is why I love the 10 second combo list that Topbrent compiled. That is money right there.
Old 07-20-2012, 05:46 PM
  #46  
In-Zane Moderator
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

I think the snappier feel is kind of true, the power is usually in faster, so it seems snappier to me. Seems to explode to life upon throttle stab.
Old 07-20-2012, 06:47 PM
  #47  
10 Second Club
 
Doug G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Harford Co. Maryland
Posts: 4,314
Received 123 Likes on 110 Posts

Default

- More Torque and More Horsepower throughout the useable RPM range. (Some call this peaky, others call this winning the race by being faster)
- Higher cranking compression. (earlier intake valve close) dynamic comp.
- increased EGR effect, or intake draw velocity. ????
- Snappier feel. power earlier in RPM range
- Rougher Idle due to overlap
- Intolerance to exhaust backpressure
- Poor emissions due to overlap
- Higher fuel consumption ??? maybe

Wide LSA's give better drive-ability,emissions,smoother idle,and ect. the Mfg's think most want.
Power with a wide LSA seems to come in later in the RPM range
Old 07-21-2012, 01:15 AM
  #48  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
stevecritt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 460
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^ Lots of good info up there. Thanks.

well I talked with the guy at EPS and he seemed pretty straight forward. We are going to talk over some combos and go from there. Did not get a chance to go over any specifics really.



Quick Reply: Cant deside on cam?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.