compression question
#3
10 Second Club
.006 per cc and measuring them would be the right thing to do.
Running the numbers and shavin' .050 I' m looking at 11.3:1 with everything else stock. Approximately
Running the numbers and shavin' .050 I' m looking at 11.3:1 with everything else stock. Approximately
#7
10 Second Club
Steve, to keep my math easy, I just input all the stock info and then reduce the gasket by the thickness to be milled. Kind of a down and dirty method. LOL works up to a .050 cut
Trending Topics
#9
speed is right about the gasket giving more than the mill. However stock diameter isn't 4.060 on a GM 6.0 head gasket. Its closer to 4.100. On L92 heads the edges of the head chamber are larger than a 4.060 gasket (not that it presents a problem). The GM 6.0 gasket is larger than the chamber.
Last edited by The stunningman; 09-25-2014 at 09:29 PM.
#10
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
speed is right about the gasket giving more than the mill. However stock diameter isn't 4.060 on a GM 6.0 head gasket. Its closer to 4.100. On L92 heads the edges of the head chamber are larger than a 4.060 gasket (not that it presents a problem). The GM 6.0 gasket is larger than the chamber.
Last edited by speedtigger; 10-06-2014 at 09:51 AM. Reason: corrected part #
#11
10 Second Club
The calculator I used doesn't ask for a gasket bore diameter. So not taken into equation.
You have the deck height at -.006....I used 0. I see this is where the difference comes in.
I adjusted the one I used to input a stock LQ4 compression of 9.43:1, that is where I got the 0. With the -.006 I get 9.55:1
I also have to ask...with the combustion chamber shape being what it is, how can a single number (.006) equal a set amount of increase ?
I can see it to a point, but wouldn't it increase once you get past that point ?
So, yes, really should measure to be sure.
No argument here, and no feelings hurt.....I'm not a machinist by trade
You have the deck height at -.006....I used 0. I see this is where the difference comes in.
I adjusted the one I used to input a stock LQ4 compression of 9.43:1, that is where I got the 0. With the -.006 I get 9.55:1
I also have to ask...with the combustion chamber shape being what it is, how can a single number (.006) equal a set amount of increase ?
I can see it to a point, but wouldn't it increase once you get past that point ?
So, yes, really should measure to be sure.
No argument here, and no feelings hurt.....I'm not a machinist by trade