LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

Carbureted LSX Forum Carburetors | Carbed Intakes | Carb Tuning Tips for LSX Enthusiasts

LQ9 Power guess

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2018, 03:53 PM
  #21  
10 Second Club
 
Doug G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Harford Co. Maryland
Posts: 4,285
Received 106 Likes on 94 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by newschool72
Try 11.30 at 120 with a weight of 3410.
Looking at the numbers....you still had .3-.4 left in it (10.9-11.0)
Your ET X MPH = ____ (1320 is the number you're looking for if NA)

But those numbers show....
Your HP computed from your vehicle ET is 420.39 rear wheel HP and 467.10 flywheel HP.
Your HP computed from your vehicle MPH is 424.69 rear wheel HP and 471.88 flywheel HP.

At 11.0/122/3410....which I think it should run.
Your HP computed from your vehicle ET is 455.73 rear wheel HP and 506.37 flywheel HP.
Your HP computed from your vehicle MPH is 446.29 rear wheel HP and 495.87 flywheel HP.

http://www.wallaceracing.com/Calculators.htm
Last edited by Doug G; 05-08-2018 at 04:03 PM.
Doug G is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-09-2018, 04:01 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
newschool72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: georgia
Posts: 1,862
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts

Default
Car only made 356 rwhp on a dynojet and 365 rwhp on Dynomaxs dyno (dont recall dyno brand ) at one of their dyno challenges a few years ago. It was a free deal for cars with dynomax mufflers, so dont laugh. I didnt do it to be competative , lol.
newschool72 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-10-2018, 05:42 PM
  #23  
10 Second Club
 
Doug G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Harford Co. Maryland
Posts: 4,285
Received 106 Likes on 94 Posts

Default
I trust the math more than a dyno, although 2 were VERY close.

It takes XXX amount of power to move XXXX amount of weight a specific distance in a specific amount of time.
Doug G is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-17-2018, 06:50 PM
  #24  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (78)
 
dmracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: HERE
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default


dmracing is offline  
Reply Like
Old 06-15-2018, 05:42 PM
  #25  
Teching In
 
c4lhozwalte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: alma,ar
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
my stock cam lq4 junkyard motor made 319rwhp on motor,500rwhp with a .82 jet.
c4lhozwalte is offline  
Reply Like
Old 06-17-2018, 03:42 PM
  #26  
10 Second Club
 
Doug G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Harford Co. Maryland
Posts: 4,285
Received 106 Likes on 94 Posts

Default
been a month....any hard numbers yet ?
Doug G is offline  
Reply Like
Old 06-17-2018, 06:08 PM
  #27  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (78)
 
dmracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: HERE
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default
10.09@148
dmracing is offline  
Reply Like
Old 06-17-2018, 06:41 PM
  #28  
10 Second Club
 
Doug G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Harford Co. Maryland
Posts: 4,285
Received 106 Likes on 94 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by dmracing
10.09@148
weight ? 2400ish ? math looks funky. (mph Vs ET)

As you can see...….
Your HP computed from your vehicle ET is 416.83 rear wheel HP and 463.15 flywheel HP.
Your HP computed from your vehicle MPH is 560.76 rear wheel HP and 623.06 flywheel HP.
Last edited by Doug G; 06-17-2018 at 06:48 PM.
Doug G is offline  
Reply Like
Old 06-17-2018, 08:13 PM
  #29  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (78)
 
dmracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: HERE
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default
Car weighs 2937 with me
dmracing is offline  
Reply Like
Old 06-17-2018, 08:47 PM
  #30  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (78)
 
dmracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: HERE
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Cars been 9.40 na with a 408
Last edited by dmracing; 06-18-2018 at 04:15 AM.
dmracing is offline  
Reply Like
Old 06-17-2018, 08:49 PM
  #31  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (78)
 
dmracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: HERE
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

And 7.70/180 with a turbo engine
dmracing is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-17-2019, 05:58 PM
  #32  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
totalchaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Alberta , Canada
Posts: 318
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
What do your heads? Doing a build that's pretty close to you. Going in a new edge body. Pretty sure I seen you said ran 9's on motor and 8's on the juice. How much did you spray?
totalchaos is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-17-2019, 10:20 PM
  #33  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (78)
 
dmracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: HERE
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by totalchaos
What do your heads? Doing a build that's pretty close to you. Going in a new edge body. Pretty sure I seen you said ran 9's on motor and 8's on the juice. How much did you spray?
with this motor 10.09@148
dmracing is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-17-2019, 10:25 PM
  #34  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (78)
 
dmracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: HERE
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default
Wegner ported these heads for NASCAR
dmracing is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-18-2019, 04:18 AM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
 
TTur1996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,269
Received 162 Likes on 120 Posts
Default
[QUOTE=Doug G;19915998] math looks funky. (mph Vs ET)

I totally agree.

TTur1996 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-18-2019, 04:35 AM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
 
TTur1996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,269
Received 162 Likes on 120 Posts
Default
You sure it wasn't 10.09 @135mph. Everything computes perfect that way. If you compute it from speed and from ET it comes out 571 from speed @ 135mph and 572 from ET @10.09.
TTur1996 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-18-2019, 06:13 AM
  #37  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (78)
 
dmracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: HERE
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default
The engine was dynoed over 600 hp
dmracing is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-19-2019, 03:27 AM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
 
TTur1996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,269
Received 162 Likes on 120 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by TTur1996
You sure it wasn't 10.09 @135mph. Everything computes perfect that way. If you compute it from speed and from ET it comes out 571 from speed @ 135mph and 572 from ET @10.09.
This would be RWHP. It would have dynode over 600 at the flywheel.
TTur1996 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-19-2019, 04:34 AM
  #39  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (78)
 
dmracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: HERE
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default
Convertor was wrong and tires were old radial. 1.8s 60 ft. I expect it quicker this spring.
dmracing is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-19-2019, 12:37 PM
  #40  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
fast89stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hardin ky
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default
Yes cause my 1st combo went 10.08 @134mph. @2935lbs
fast89stang is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 PM.