Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2018, 09:48 AM
  #541  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,659
Received 1,099 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

Nice, yes we always like video. I need to put up some Youtube videos of my creation.

While I have a Hi Ram I will say friends have also done well with the Edelbrock Pro Flo. I need to check where they are shifting those and report back.

My hero car (the build I'm mostly emulating) runs 28s and a 3.70 gear and is shifted at 8k. I plan something similar, and am tracking a used 40 spline center section to get so I can rebuild whatever is in this car.
Old 06-11-2018, 08:27 AM
  #542  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,858
Received 677 Likes on 500 Posts

Default

First time back since fixing the trans and HG. Trans worked perfect, car was so-so. Seems WAY down on power, not sure why.

Boost kept wanting to run away on me. Hit boost cut my first 3 passes. Had to make a ton of changes to the boost control, but got that ironed out I think. Back pressure is right around 1:1 till 17lbs and creeps up slightly 1.2:1. The low back pressure on this small engine and big S480 makes boost harder to control I’m thinking.

All seems well in the tune/logs. 11.5-11.0 AFR, 12* of timing. Was only trapping 142 or so at 20lbs. . Nearest I can tell I’m down about 10-12 mph from where it should be. Still falls on its *** around 6300 as well. That isn’t helping matters, but I don’t think it’s my main issue since it’s always done this. I’ll be swapping my 3.25 out with a 3.60 gear soon.

Noticed the IAT temps seem a little off for the boost level. Only 122* @ 20lbs. Starting out around 100* pre-pass. Need to verify the MAP sensor is correct. Hopefully the MAP is wrong and I’m at less boost than I think I am. I did degree the cam when I put it in. But the engine is only spitting out about 160psi warm cranking compression. That seems super low for a small 216/222 cam @ 10:1 base compression.
Old 06-11-2018, 09:01 AM
  #543  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,659
Received 1,099 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

...Boost leak?
Old 06-11-2018, 09:12 AM
  #544  
TECH Resident
 
Tjabo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Shouldn't back pressure ratio be high if there was a boost leak, and probably also IATs on the high side?

Forecefed, this is very interesting! Have you tried adding a degree of timing to see if it wants a bit more?
Old 06-11-2018, 09:16 AM
  #545  
Turbo Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
RICE ETR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Thanks for the update. What are the common denominators in the 6k face plants of all the engines? MS3, cam and converter?
Old 06-11-2018, 10:25 AM
  #546  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,858
Received 677 Likes on 500 Posts

Default

Could be, I’ll pressure test it. That is usually accompanied with high backpressure and inlet temps. 120* is pretty low for 100* ambient at 20lbs+. I’d see 150-160 on the old motor, same boost. But that was with the S476. I can’t see the VSR 80mm unit being much better than the “real” S476 FI unit I had on it. Only swapped because my old turbo went with the old motor

If the MAP and the IAT sensors are correct... I’m stumped.

Dusty at PTC thinks it’s the converter/gearing. But I don’t really understand that. If it were only in 2nd gear maybe... but it does the same in 1st gear. Tried to rev it out to 7k in first to carry the shift and it was crap. Dropping to a 28” tire made it worse as well as I just hit “the wall” faster. I’m betting a shorter gear will do the same.


Everybody screams valve springs... But I’ve got the .660 BTR dual springs in this one. Can’t see that being an issue. Also measured my spring rates in the old motor and had plenty of spring pressure for 7k.


Intake manifold is still the LS6. I know that’s not ideal above 6k but It shouldn’t hit a wall at 6300.

I’m stuck on the lowish compression thing. Still has the OEM pushrods in it... They might be doing funky things. Need to double check lengths and order a decent set to rule it out. Might ditch the cam this winter as well if nothing “fixes” it.

MS3 might also have issues. I keep meaning to try the “batch fire” fuel and spark just to rule it out. Currently on sequential fuel/spark.
Old 06-11-2018, 11:48 AM
  #547  
Turbo Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
RICE ETR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Is the hotside still 2" OD tubing?
I have been doing tons of searching regarding power falling off up top trying to wrap my head around it (turbo car mainly). Most people point to valvesprings or the turbo's turbine...but there has to be more to it as I see it frequently even with well set-up systems.
You seem to have done a lot of systematic testing/changing of components so I am really curious to see what resolves the issue. Have a "terrible" roudy NA cam you can throw in there? I will paypal you some Corona money if you have the time to do the swap
Old 06-11-2018, 12:14 PM
  #548  
TECH Resident
 
Tjabo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
MS3 might also have issues. I keep meaning to try the “batch fire” fuel and spark just to rule it out. Currently on sequential fuel/spark.
What are you thinking in terms of this? I have a very underperforming car currently that I suspect to be just super cam limited, but I have it on MS3+MS3X that I built, running on full sequential. Everything appears good in the logs, but I have to admit I'm beginning to grasp at straws a bit.. I'm not above taking a crack at batch firing the injectors and/or using wasted spark if you think there might be something to it.
Old 06-11-2018, 02:04 PM
  #549  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,858
Received 677 Likes on 500 Posts

Default

Yup same 2” hotside. If it flowed well enough to trap 160 on the 370” motor, should do it on a 4.8 too. The “spool” time is really pretty good considering the super tight 14 stator 9.5 converter spec'd for the 370. (was even on the tight side there)

Not sure if a really rowdy cam is the thing for a mild 4.8 with a medium sized single. I still plan to run the boost up a ways more once it’s ironed out. So back pressure will be up quite a bit more. Curts 4.8 did REALLY well with LJMS stage 2 cam. May go that route. His small t4 S475 was taking him to 157ish I believe. My 212/212 @ 112 cam 4.8 went 151 on 19lbs with the T4 S476 as well. This cam’s a little bigger and on a 111 LSA. So should be a little snappier and more “NA like”.

Pointing fingers at the MS3 because my mustang and the previous motor in the RX-7 did the exact same thing. I have a th400 in the mustang (with BTR duals springs) Even with the super low TH400 first gear it acts the same. So I can’t see it being converter or valve train. Changing over to wasted speak/fuel deal should just be a couple clicks in general settings. Easy enough to test anyway.

So far all my engines with low cranking compression have been dogs. All healthy cranking compression engines have run extremely well. My last alum 5.3 was spitting out almost 190-195 psi cold cranking and was a total beast with the triple 12 cam in it. Trapped right at 159 at 25-26lbs.
Old 06-12-2018, 12:08 PM
  #550  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,659
Received 1,099 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

L33 has higher compression, makes sense.

Capizzi's 4.8 combo had less guts, he turned it up like 2 lbs to run the same 60 foot.
Old 08-07-2018, 03:40 PM
  #551  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,858
Received 677 Likes on 500 Posts

Default

RX-7 is still alive and kick’n. Took it out this past Saturday night.

Haven’t been to the track much, but I’ve been fighting traction all year with this 4.8. I thought this had to do with lowering the car since it puts a poor angle on the ladder bars and hits the tire much softer. So I removed my drop links and jacked the chassis way up in the rear like it was. Same shock settings, springs, and 150lbs of rear ballast. Looks goofy, but I’m tired of spinning! I raised the rear strut perch until the ladder bar was barely level with the frame. Should be at an upward angle to hit the tires hard, but this chassis won’t allow that with the current FWD bar mounts. (need to change that I guess) Also guessing the Drag radials are past their prime.

Got 8 runs in and blew the tires off on 5 of them. Tried form 3400 to 4400 RPM on 2 step. Anything below 4200 and it bogs pretty bad regardless of boost. I think the baby engine needs a little RPM. Above 7 lbs it spins, below it bogs. Best passes I went up to 4400 and 10lbs then pulled it down to 4* of timing for the first 2.5 seconds. This stuck a 1.5X bogging shortly after the launch. Netted me a 9.6 @ 146 on 17lbs and a 9.4 @ 149 on 19-20lbs. Both at 11* of timing. When it bogs it takes over a second to recover. If I had the chassis to stick this thing hard, It’d be quick! (for a mild 4.8 anyway). I think it has another 5-6mph in the tune easy. I could turn it up, but I’d like to get the launch down before risking the engine.
Old 08-28-2018, 11:35 AM
  #552  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,659
Received 1,099 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

What size DRs right now?
Old 08-28-2018, 11:57 AM
  #553  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,858
Received 677 Likes on 500 Posts

Default

30” tires this year, with a 3.25 gear. My radials were really worn though. Might have been most of the issue with traction. The 14 stator PTC 9.5” isn’t helping!

Just pulled the 3.25’s and put in a set of 3.64’s and dropped to a 28” tire. Going to try it again this weekend I hope.
Old 08-28-2018, 12:52 PM
  #554  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,659
Received 1,099 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

So you were running 315s?
Old 08-28-2018, 12:56 PM
  #555  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,858
Received 677 Likes on 500 Posts

Default

Yup... Pretty old ones.
Old 08-28-2018, 01:18 PM
  #556  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,659
Received 1,099 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

What's your RPM drop on the shift?
Old 08-28-2018, 03:38 PM
  #557  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

The tyres are bigger than the car !!! lol
Old 09-04-2018, 12:33 PM
  #558  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,858
Received 677 Likes on 500 Posts

Default

Well the gear change didn’t do much. Sitting at 6600ish according to the logs and hanging both gears. Resulted in a couple 9.3X @ 147ish passes, but mostly spun. I lost MPH due to the shorter gear and tire. Stopped pulling well before the traps. Guess a re-stall is in order. No telling when I can get that done.

Saw about 1100 rpm drop on the shift. Indicating about 3% slip by trap VS rpm VS VSS

Noted it makes 7-10lbs on the 2 step and is at 20 1.2 seconds in. Most passes I spun right at the 1 second mark.

If all I have is 6600 to work with the 30” tire will put it in a happier place anyway. Going to try that next time. 6600 with a 30” tire and 3% would put it at 157ish.

Baby 275’s buddy has some good footage of the launch, but still working on uploading it.

79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)-ekb3y87.jpg
Old 09-04-2018, 01:41 PM
  #559  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Chicago TDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Have you logged voltage and fuel pressure? I noticed my car would lay over past 5500rpm. Saw a voltage drop so went to a larger alt pully. Then also say fuel drop which was I needed bigger wires to my 2 in tank pumps. Now pulls clean all the way to 6800. Would have never seen the issues unless I watched my volts and fuel pressure logged against rpm
Old 09-04-2018, 01:57 PM
  #560  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,858
Received 677 Likes on 500 Posts

Default

Sure do... both are great. Targeted AFR is pretty spot on as well with little correction being made. DC is no where near maxed.

Thanks though!


Quick Reply: 79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.