Got Banned at the Corral....
09-28-2009, 03:23 PM
#21
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Corral is actually one of the better sources for Fox info ive found, but man do they get butthurt fast if you talk about shoving a real engine in there.
Thats why LS1tech rocks, friendlier people with open minds.
Thats why LS1tech rocks, friendlier people with open minds.
09-28-2009, 09:30 PM
#22
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NW INDIANA
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well here's my only and biggest problem with both of the other brand lowliest; everyone hates it when people put Chevy under the hood but yet nothing is ever said about putting Chevy behind the other 2's engine now do they.......that is ok with both other parties cause it's been done for so long they don't know any better. Lets be realistic here Ford engines flat out suck and Mopar well that kinda speaks for itself. I personally love when the Ford lowliest get all bent out of shape so much I built 2.
09-28-2009, 09:47 PM
#23
On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Covington La
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
f svt performance id like to get my hands on the so called dipshit owner of that site. Corral ive never been on modular fords is where its at if you need ford tech and here is for ls1tech.
09-29-2009, 12:05 AM
#25
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DAVIDSON NC
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sorry to hear that dave i feel kinda responsible for bringing you in on the argument, i geuss the truth was alittle to much for some of them to handle....i have to tread lightly over there myself...the die hards over there can cuss and call you names and if i say the least thing out of the way the thread gets locked...
Last edited by billyflantos; 09-29-2009 at 10:05 AM.
09-29-2009, 12:11 AM
#26
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most of them are just aggrevated that they can't go as fast as you. I say congrats. Once a car is basically a race car, who cares if its a chevy in a ford.
09-30-2009, 06:54 PM
#31
What a douche!!! I love my mustang and ford had a great run with the fox cars from 87-93 while gm was snoozing and 90% of the f-bodys running around had 305's which were just plain worthless. Ever since the lt1, and especially now with the LS motors, it's time to admit that gm built a better mouse trap and move on. That's what I did 
(building a 90 fox car with a 6.0)
(building a 90 fox car with a 6.0)
10-01-2009, 12:40 AM
#32
I have met Greg and been to the **** hole track he is so proud of.
It is really kind of funny how the few cleveland guys are like the Jay Allen group over there.
I just can't wait to get mine finished up and see what they have to say. I have my screw driver all polished up ready to tune it up.
Tim
It is really kind of funny how the few cleveland guys are like the Jay Allen group over there.
I just can't wait to get mine finished up and see what they have to say. I have my screw driver all polished up ready to tune it up.
Tim
10-01-2009, 06:47 AM
#33
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The way some of the BS got started over there was a Thread titled "No way an LSX" The theme was that there is no way an LS engine can run 9's with a cam and switch to carb, certainly not a lower compression iron truck motor.
There were 2 individuals i believe to be brothers that race Clevor engines(Cleveland heads on a windsor block) There argument was how superior the cleveland design was to any thing LS. Their 408 solid roller 12.5/1 Clevors were running 10 teens in Febuary(winter conditions).
The list of arguments was lond,
my car is lighter than the stated weight, they accused of 2100lbs, thats a good one.
The engine is not what is stated, low compression truck engine with cam/carb.
Since so few LS cars run this fast with so little mods , can't be possible.
They have not seen such a car in their area, therefore it can't be true!!
The Clevor design from 30 years ago is still superior today, that's a good one!
There will be more and more of these combo's showing up as some have builds in progress.
Should just drive them Nutzz!!!
There were 2 individuals i believe to be brothers that race Clevor engines(Cleveland heads on a windsor block) There argument was how superior the cleveland design was to any thing LS. Their 408 solid roller 12.5/1 Clevors were running 10 teens in Febuary(winter conditions).
The list of arguments was lond,
my car is lighter than the stated weight, they accused of 2100lbs, thats a good one.
The engine is not what is stated, low compression truck engine with cam/carb.
Since so few LS cars run this fast with so little mods , can't be possible.
They have not seen such a car in their area, therefore it can't be true!!
The Clevor design from 30 years ago is still superior today, that's a good one!
There will be more and more of these combo's showing up as some have builds in progress.
Should just drive them Nutzz!!!
10-01-2009, 08:32 AM
#34
9 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i read a couple threads in the conversion section. wow are they ignorant! they don't understand fast is fast no matter hwo you get there.
few really seem to hate the LSX motors lol
few really seem to hate the LSX motors lol
10-01-2009, 09:47 AM
#35
Oh well, let em' keep running people off. They have people hand feeding them a recipe for one of the most low budget 9sec rides in history and they would rather run 10's and 11's splitting stock blocks or spending twice as much on big money engines. Just more people for us to outrun!!
10-01-2009, 10:07 AM
#36
On The Tree
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-01-2009, 11:14 AM
#38
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Detroit
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The same Ford guys that p..ss and moan will spend thousand to drop a Dart block with Trick Flow heads and an Eagle rotating assembly in their car. None of that stuff is Ford... How about a Currie rear end? Not ford! Harwood hood? Not Ford! B&M shifter? Not Ford! Centerforce clutch? Not Ford! American Racing wheels? K&N filter? BBK headers? Not ford! And the list goes on...
10-01-2009, 11:47 AM
#39
Oh well, let em' keep running people off. They have people hand feeding them a recipe for one of the most low budget 9sec rides in history and they would rather run 10's and 11's splitting stock blocks or spending twice as much on big money engines. Just more people for us to outrun!!
they pump themselves up and set themselves up. excuses get old.
