L33 in Porsche 911
09-30-2009, 11:27 AM
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hatfield, AR
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
L33 in Porsche 911 Well, it's almost done.
Needs some carb and ignition fine tuning, but it starts and drives, everything works as before, including A/C.
Pics at http://hatfield.homelinux.com/porsche_v8.html
Ken
Needs some carb and ignition fine tuning, but it starts and drives, everything works as before, including A/C.
Pics at http://hatfield.homelinux.com/porsche_v8.html
Ken
Trending Topics
10-07-2009, 05:54 PM
#12
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hatfield, AR
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Carb/Ignition Settings I don't know if anybody cares, but here are the tuning settings:
Engine:L33
Intake: Edelbrock Dual Plane
Exhaust: 2002 Camaro Manifolds
Carb: 600 cfm Holley Vacuum Secondaries
Ignition: MSD 6010
Ignition Settings: Pill 5
Carb Settings: Short yellow secondary spring, green accelerator pump cam on #2.
Cam: Comp Cams XR269HR
Transmission: 5 speed 915
Rear axle ratio: 3:88:1
Anything else you want to know, just ask.
With these settings, at 1500 rpm is 2nd gear, flooring the gas pedal squeals the rear tires (with a 45/55 weight distribution) and pulls hard to the 6000 rpm rev limiter. No dyno numbers available, and I'm figuring it's not worth $350 for a few horsepower more and for them to tell me it is 352 rwhp instead of 325, or vice-versa.
Regards,
Ken
Engine:L33
Intake: Edelbrock Dual Plane
Exhaust: 2002 Camaro Manifolds
Carb: 600 cfm Holley Vacuum Secondaries
Ignition: MSD 6010
Ignition Settings: Pill 5
Carb Settings: Short yellow secondary spring, green accelerator pump cam on #2.
Cam: Comp Cams XR269HR
Transmission: 5 speed 915
Rear axle ratio: 3:88:1
Anything else you want to know, just ask.
With these settings, at 1500 rpm is 2nd gear, flooring the gas pedal squeals the rear tires (with a 45/55 weight distribution) and pulls hard to the 6000 rpm rev limiter. No dyno numbers available, and I'm figuring it's not worth $350 for a few horsepower more and for them to tell me it is 352 rwhp instead of 325, or vice-versa.
Regards,
Ken
