Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4.8 vs. 5.3 Scammed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2013, 10:35 AM
  #21  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
65ChevyIINova's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dayton OH
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 427zm
Are you milling the heads to get them to 61cc? The stock 5.3/4.8 heads are pretty potent when ported and polished. They put down good power for the buck for sure. Chamber size all depends on what direction you want to take it. If you want to stay NA, I'd bump the CR by milling.
I thought the stock heads were 61.15cc? I have the 862 heads.

My direction is still good driver with plenty of pep. I just don't want to get too deep into the cash on just my engine when I still have half a car to build.

The only other thing I was planning on getting was a mild cam upgrade.
Old 07-21-2013, 04:40 PM
  #22  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Beanslsxnova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: waldorf,md
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

A friend of mine has a cam only 4.8/th400 in a fox body mustang and it goes 11.50's on motor at 2900lbs. How much pep do you need for you daily driver? Put a cam in it and get it tuned. After the first time you put your foot in it you will be like **** a 5.3 haha. Good luck man
Old 07-22-2013, 06:29 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
omc8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 1,539
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

I'm not a big fan of LR4 Gen III 4.8 unless its going forced induction. The jump from 4.8 to 5.3 is the biggest in LS family . 4.8 to 5.3 you get you 32 cubic inches, 5.3 to 5.7 gain 21 cu. in. 5.7 to 6.0 18 cu. in. and 6.0 to 6.2 you only gain 12 cu. in. The horsepower difference can be made up fairly easy but you are giving up 40 ft lb tq in stock form. A comparable 5.3 and 4.8 cost are the same in these years , many times the 5.3 is cheaper due to the greater supply . There have been more 5.3s produced than any other displacement.
Old 07-23-2013, 06:50 AM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
locrzn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I just took a 4.8 out of my 82 malibu and put in a 6.0 ly6. Now that its all done I wished I'd kept my original plan and did the turbo on the 4.8. Don't give up on it as the 4.8 loves boost. Go to youtube and watch some vids of 4.8 turbo cars. Its pretty cool..
Old 10-24-2013, 09:00 PM
  #25  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 64 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BigEd_72455
Go with the t350 instead. It'll run better not having to use an extra 30-40 HP for the same results..
Say wut?
Old 10-25-2013, 12:10 AM
  #26  
TECH Apprentice
 
cobalt964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

put a 5.3 crank in it and ls6 cam and springs. tune it and drive it.



Quick Reply: 4.8 vs. 5.3 Scammed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.