Custom Steam Vent Q's
http://prattmiller.com/
I used to advocate having fittings that went to -4an on all 4 steam vents feeding into a coolant swirl pot, which then drained back into the lower hose or return heater line... this is a setup that was used successfully by a few race teams, but it looks like this was a band-aid once I got 'real' information from REAL race teams.
The issue is not flow - the coolant passages flow plenty - it's pressure.* When driven hard, engines need coolant pressure to "scrape" the steam bubbles that form on hot spots in the head off the wall of the passage.* With all 4 ports open, there's not enough pressure locally (in the head) to promote proper heat transfer unless you run your overall coolant pressure extremely high (30psi or so).* Indy and F1 cars run MUCH higher than that, due to higher hp/liter (heat concentration).
The proper setup all my LSx racers are using is, assuming the top of your radiator is below the steam vent port:
*The rear vents blocked off, the front tee'd (LS6-style).
*Radiator cap replaced with "open" cap (free flow through radiator overflow port)
*Steam vent tee and radiator "overflow"/free flow feeding into coolant swirl pot (aka expansion tank)
*Swirl pot has pressurized radiator cap, bottom drains to non-thermostat-controlled water pump return
I don't fully understand that quote. There is a thing called nucleate boiling where steam bubbles form along the surface of a heat transfer surface resulting in improved cooling. I was always told the steam bubbles tend to break up the boundary layer along the surface. But since the cooling system is pressurized and the bulk of the coolant is subcooled well below the saturation temperature the bubbles quickly collapse once they break free. This is why I always have issues when people start talking about steam collecting in the top of the heads. it simply isn't that simple.
The quote below is almost arguing against using the vents. It is saying you need to keep the pressure high, I'm guessing to keep the saturation temp up?
They do talk about increased heat load making the problem worse and modifying the system pressure to keep the temps well below saturation.
Can't argue with what works, that is essentially what that quote is saying, what works for the high end racers. I still maintain the real reason for the vents is to get all the air out, doesn't take a thermodynamics degree to understand air doesn't cool as well as water, and that is why I brought up the manual vents other manufactures use. So I will keep my 15# pressure cap and 160° thermostat and be confident that gives me all the margin I need against departure from nucleate boiling.
-on a truck engine put a funnel in the pipe on the water pump that the upper radiator hose goes on then fill it up as much as you can. After its filled up to the height of the pipe install the hose and finish filling it from the radiator or surge tank depending on the system.
-same deal on cars and others with the upper radiator pipe that comes out the front instead of the top but you put the upper hose on the water pump and take it off at the radiator side. Hold the end of the hose up and fill the system as much as possible using the hose as like a funnel.
This works like a charm for me and ive never had one overheat or be hard to get the thermostat to open up the first time since i started doing it this way. Before jist filling it through the radiator/surge tank the thermostat would always seem to stick closed and damn near overheat the engine until they passed the air bubble out.
The proper setup all my LSx racers are using is, assuming the top of your radiator is below the steam vent port:
*The rear vents blocked off, the front tee'd (LS6-style).
This is how my 5.3 Suburban donor was routed originally...I wish I would have just left it alone now, instead of wasting all that time searching for a 4-corner steam tube and converting it over...(except for the fact that the top of my rad is a lot higher than my steam ports.)
This is what I finally did...worked great.
I don't fully understand that quote. There is a thing called nucleate boiling where steam bubbles form along the surface of a heat transfer surface resulting in improved cooling. I was always told the steam bubbles tend to break up the boundary layer along the surface. But since the cooling system is pressurized and the bulk of the coolant is subcooled well below the saturation temperature the bubbles quickly collapse once they break free. This is why I always have issues when people start talking about steam collecting in the top of the heads. it simply isn't that simple.
The quote below is almost arguing against using the vents. It is saying you need to keep the pressure high, I'm guessing to keep the saturation temp up?
They do talk about increased heat load making the problem worse and modifying the system pressure to keep the temps well below saturation.
Can't argue with what works, that is essentially what that quote is saying, what works for the high end racers. I still maintain the real reason for the vents is to get all the air out, doesn't take a thermodynamics degree to understand air doesn't cool as well as water, and that is why I brought up the manual vents other manufactures use. So I will keep my 15# pressure cap and 160° thermostat and be confident that gives me all the margin I need against departure from nucleate boiling.
Lots of ways to do this.
I think the line should trend upwards to avoid steam being trapped, which I believe is the purpose of the vent in the first place. Seems like my perspective is shared here plenty.
Doug
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
*Steam vent tee and radiator "overflow"/free flow feeding into coolant swirl pot (aka expansion tank)
*Swirl pot has pressurized radiator cap, bottom drains to non-thermostat-controlled water pump return "
Sounds a bit like the Vette system.










