LS1 controlled SBF???
You have a usable crank/cam input, basic sensors and inj/coils. Swap the pinout to the ford firing order and there's no reason it can't work
Looks awesome
Yeah, I'm very interested...
As for the sensor itself, I used one of the older 454 24x sensors due to how it's made. The LS one sits in the block at a bit of an angle (not really a big deal, the bracket can be twisted), and the tab as you know sticks out to the front. The 24x sensor is a dual track sensor, so orientation matters. Flipping it around would result in a no start condition as it would be interpreting the wheel backwards. This is why I chose the other style. Plug faces up as does the tab. I started with an existing crank trigger bracket setup for a SBF and cut the mounting ears off that a screw in pickup would have gone in, and welded on a block of aluminum that I had cut and drilled for the sensor to fit. Once it was welded on, I was able to shim via washers, the bracket itself and the sensor in order to get it centered over the wheel and get the airgap right. Once everything was done, I had to drill additional holes in the wheel to neutral balance it.
Since the pcm relies only on a simple digital 12v on and off signal from the cam sensor to know what stroke the engine is on (compression or exhaust), I found out that the ford EDIS system on the older 5.0 found in explorers produced the same signal. One of the great things about the 24x system is that if it loses cam signal, the start strategy will attempt the firing sequence on either stroke until the engine fires. I still wanted a cam signal though. I had to make my own cam sync since one was never produced for the 351w engines. A combination of 2 separate ones, one from the 5.0 and a 3.8 engine did the trick.
There you go, that's the jist of how I got the big stuff adapted. And before anyone else asks, no the firing sequence needed no changes whatsoever. While the firing "order" is different between OE's, the actual firing SEQUENCE is exactly the same between the 2 engines. I had to draw this out on paper in order for it to make sense to me at first.
Trending Topics
As for the sensor itself, I used one of the older 454 24x sensors due to how it's made. The LS one sits in the block at a bit of an angle (not really a big deal, the bracket can be twisted), and the tab as you know sticks out to the front. The 24x sensor is a dual track sensor, so orientation matters. Flipping it around would result in a no start condition as it would be interpreting the wheel backwards. This is why I chose the other style. Plug faces up as does the tab. I started with an existing crank trigger bracket setup for a SBF and cut the mounting ears off that a screw in pickup would have gone in, and welded on a block of aluminum that I had cut and drilled for the sensor to fit. Once it was welded on, I was able to shim via washers, the bracket itself and the sensor in order to get it centered over the wheel and get the airgap right. Once everything was done, I had to drill additional holes in the wheel to neutral balance it.
Since the pcm relies only on a simple digital 12v on and off signal from the cam sensor to know what stroke the engine is on (compression or exhaust), I found out that the ford EDIS system on the older 5.0 found in explorers produced the same signal. One of the great things about the 24x system is that if it loses cam signal, the start strategy will attempt the firing sequence on either stroke until the engine fires. I still wanted a cam signal though. I had to make my own cam sync since one was never produced for the 351w engines. A combination of 2 separate ones, one from the 5.0 and a 3.8 engine did the trick.
There you go, that's the jist of how I got the big stuff adapted. And before anyone else asks, no the firing sequence needed no changes whatsoever. While the firing "order" is different between OE's, the actual firing SEQUENCE is exactly the same between the 2 engines. I had to draw this out on paper in order for it to make sense to me at first.
The crank pulley attaches directly to the balance in my case:
So I do not see a way of attaching the reluctor wheel in the same way you did.
Do you by change still have the reluctor wheel inner hole dimensions?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
The crank pulley attaches directly to the balance in my case:
So I do not see a way of attaching the reluctor wheel in the same way you did.
Do you by change still have the reluctor wheel inner hole dimensions?
Have you looked into the EDIS setup in the explorers? The balancer for those had a wheel on it, not the right one for what your trying to do, but it could potentially be replaced with a 24x wheel. Alternatively, you could make a spacer plate to fit inside of the 24x reluctor that matches the bolt pattern of the balancer, then machine that thickness off of the balancer face (just the portion the bolts go through).






