Few pics LSX Mustang
my mistake.
09-04-2006, 10:10 PM
#24
11 Second Club
iTrader: (46)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: tulsa ok
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DopeFedZ
care to email me more pics of the rear tire setup and just how you got the 28" under there
Lt16spdz28@aol.com
09-05-2006, 01:53 PM
#25
Launching!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
28" tire is easy. You club the hell out of the inner fender with a 2.5lb sledge hammer, roll the fender lips as far back as possible, and use a 15x8 wheel with 5.5" backspacing. Here's the same combo on my '93, which also required liberally hacking up the side skirts and rear bumper extension.
The key is the inner fender hammering. You literally have to bash it until the metal won't move anymore. It's critical in the front part of the wheelwell. I've seen people use a 15x10 wheel with 6.5" backspacing too, but its a much tighter fit.
The key is the inner fender hammering. You literally have to bash it until the metal won't move anymore. It's critical in the front part of the wheelwell. I've seen people use a 15x10 wheel with 6.5" backspacing too, but its a much tighter fit.
09-05-2006, 02:37 PM
#26
11 Second Club
iTrader: (46)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: tulsa ok
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CMcCarthy
28" tire is easy. You club the hell out of the inner fender with a 2.5lb sledge hammer, roll the fender lips as far back as possible, and use a 15x8 wheel with 5.5" backspacing. Here's the same combo on my '93, which also required liberally hacking up the side skirts and rear bumper extension.
The key is the inner fender hammering. You literally have to bash it until the metal won't move anymore. It's critical in the front part of the wheelwell. I've seen people use a 15x10 wheel with 6.5" backspacing too, but its a much tighter fit.
The key is the inner fender hammering. You literally have to bash it until the metal won't move anymore. It's critical in the front part of the wheelwell. I've seen people use a 15x10 wheel with 6.5" backspacing too, but its a much tighter fit.
mines a coupe car i knew it needed the BFH mod
gonna order my bogarts 15x9 w/6.25" bs ( heard the c-clip elims on a 8.8 make it .25 wide on the flanges )
09-05-2006, 03:42 PM
#27
hey can you post a shot of exactly how much hood clearance was needed in your setup, it looks like you could almost fit the stock hood on.
my hybrid will be a carb setup and I really would like to retain the stock hood for a truly sleeper aesthetic
thanks in advance
my hybrid will be a carb setup and I really would like to retain the stock hood for a truly sleeper aesthetic
thanks in advance
09-05-2006, 04:57 PM
#28
Launching!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jeff, those bogarts should absolutely be the ticket. How much wider it is depends on what brand of c-clip eliminators you use. Some require more housing trimming than others.
09-05-2006, 06:38 PM
#29
Staging Lane
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by exstanger
It is my opinion and mine only that Ford cars should have ford engines and chevy's should have chevy engines.
09-05-2006, 06:55 PM
#30
OK! First, I'm a noob here, and a Ford guy to boot. I make my living building hybrids, so this forum interests me greatly.
Exstranger, don't feel bad about your comments and/or questions. I feel the same, especially since I use Ford motors in my business. However, after seeing these LSx motors in action its hard to ignore the engineered in horsepower. I'm now thinking of dropping one in my Granada wagon parts hauler. Here's why:
My uncle has an SN-95 Mustang with a fully stroked and poked 408. Big cam, big heads, big compression, big carb. Full drag race suspension, blah blah blah. Oh! I forgot... big dollars!!! Went to the track to test, first pass out of the trailer, 10.60 @ 134. Good, but nowhere near what was expected. So theres some tuning that need to be done. Heres the good part. In the next lane was a Fairmont wagon that was dead quiet, with mufflers that ran 10 flat @ 140. And the guy got thrown out for not having a cage. Did he put it on the trailer and go home? Hell to the naw!!! He drove it home.. Chuck
Exstranger, don't feel bad about your comments and/or questions. I feel the same, especially since I use Ford motors in my business. However, after seeing these LSx motors in action its hard to ignore the engineered in horsepower. I'm now thinking of dropping one in my Granada wagon parts hauler. Here's why:
My uncle has an SN-95 Mustang with a fully stroked and poked 408. Big cam, big heads, big compression, big carb. Full drag race suspension, blah blah blah. Oh! I forgot... big dollars!!! Went to the track to test, first pass out of the trailer, 10.60 @ 134. Good, but nowhere near what was expected. So theres some tuning that need to be done. Heres the good part. In the next lane was a Fairmont wagon that was dead quiet, with mufflers that ran 10 flat @ 140. And the guy got thrown out for not having a cage. Did he put it on the trailer and go home? Hell to the naw!!! He drove it home.. Chuck
09-05-2006, 07:57 PM
#32
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm running at 15x10 6.5" BS Bogart with 28's...they tuck up nicely. I had some 5.5's and they stuck out too much, hitting into the outer fender.
Yeah, I had to do the BFH mod, but they don't hit.
Yeah, I had to do the BFH mod, but they don't hit.
09-06-2006, 05:04 AM
#34
TECH Addict
Originally Posted by exstanger
I don't get this whole lsx in a fox body thing. If I'm not mistaken it would be much less aggrevation to just build a stroker motor from Ford. What are the advantages of putting this motor in. And don't say it's hp b/c you can build a sbf just as cheap or cheaper. Don't seem worth all the work to me.
It does look nice and a good clean install.
It does look nice and a good clean install.
LS1's are pretty cheap and easy to find.
And as nice as the 302ci is it's an old engine and not great on power. Even a built h/c/i with bolt ons stuggles to make as much as a stock LS1. A stock ci 346 Ls1 will rival a 427 Ford big block in the HP department. But still remain streetable.
Plus there's mpg issues also, the LSx engines are very fuel efficent by comparison.
Personally I really love the Fox and would really like to own a Notchback. My initial plan was add a blower and exhaust, but even then it's pushing the internals and still won't be making much more HP than a stock LS1.
My other solution was using a Jaguar 4.2 DOHC V8. These are pretty compact despite being DOHC and they weight the same as a LS1. For less money than supercharing the 302ci with a few bolt ons I could get a 400bhp 4.2 Supercharged Jag engine. More power, less weight. A few simple mods should see an easy 450-500bhp out of the Jag motor too.
I guess in the US a Jag V8 would be a more expensive route, but here in the UK it'd cost similar or less than a 2nd hand LS1.
09-06-2006, 05:29 AM
#35
TECH Addict
Originally Posted by exstanger
It is my opinion and mine only that Ford cars should have ford engines and chevy's should have chevy engines.
Think about it.
AC cars used BMC engines and Ford engine.
Honda used to use Rover engines
TVR used Rover engines
Rolls Royces have BMW engines
Bentleys and the new Buggati have a VW engine
Audi, Skoda & Seat all use VW engines
Saab use Subaru engines in some models
Rover and others have used Peouget engines
Land Rover have Jaguar, Ford and BMW engines
Mazda have used Ford engines
Lincoln uses Jaguar engines
Aston Martin uses Ford and Jaguar engines
Lambo's have a VW V10
Dodge Trucks use Mercedes and Cummins diesel engines
The list is quite endless.....
09-06-2006, 11:13 AM
#37
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Port Charlotte, FL
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And dont forget jeeps once came with the buick motors too. Had your choice of the dauntless v6 the 327, the 350 and the 400 buick. And they were awesome for the 60's era SUV...tough as any.
09-08-2006, 01:30 AM
#38
Teching In
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
add to it, unless you want to drop the $$$ on "R" block or a dart block... welcome to a split 302 when making serious power, 450+hp. You could go with a 351w based motor which are stronger, but they won't fit under a stock hood and add more weight...
I love stangs but chevy killed ford in the push rod department
I love stangs but chevy killed ford in the push rod department
09-08-2006, 08:32 AM
#40
I agree, my brother in law has a Drag race Fox body that he just bought. The thing has a 347 in it now and I know tweaking it and putting some N2O on it is just going to land it in splitsville. Not to mention he wants to go 9's. I'm thinking lets just take weight out of it, put a LS2 in there with L92 heads, cam and a single plane and go racing. I know that setup will be silly and cheap when it's done.
Bret
Bret