LS motor to Th350
So far my habit has resulted in a jeep getting built and now I'm about to start a full on tube buggy. For this application, running a TH350 makes life easy (for doing a transfer case doubler anyway). However, I really like the idea of a modern powerplant since carbs don't do well going up vertical walls.
So here goes my question list
1) Do the bellhousings line up? I seem to recall reading that the LS1 has 7 bolts while the TH350 has 6?
2) What flexplate/torque convertor issues will I run into?
3) All I should need is a computer setup for a manual tranny to run the non-electronic Th350?
4) Does the LS1 share the same block (externally) with the vortec 5.3 (4.8 and 6.0 as well) engines? These seem to be cheaper, however the aftermarket for the LS1 kicks butt!
Sorry for dragging down the forum with stupid questions. Also, the for sale section of this forum is awesome, I love the activity!
Bill
You need a spacer for the torque convertor hub, so it reaches the crankshaft, or a convertor made for an LS1. http://www.sdpc2000.com/search.asp?s...acer&doquery=1
The tranny will bolt up but with only 5 bolts out of six.
You need a VSS of some sort. http://www.magsensors.com/vss.html
Sorry for dragging down the forum with stupid questions.
Bill
No such thing as stupid questions.....
The LS1 and the truck motors (4.8 / 5.3 / 6.0) are all the same externally (except the intake & front accessories). Most of the truck motors are iron blocks (a few are alum) vs the LS1's alum block. Weight-wise the difference is in the 80 to 100lb range (there is some dispute about the actual difference, I don't have a concrete number).
There are some differences among truck motors, depending upon year, basically the same as between an LS1 and an LS2. Cam position sensor moves, knock sensors are different, both to accomodate the displacement on demand feature. Also, some early versions of the truck motor are iron headed (like the '99 LQ4 6.0) and are significantly less desirable, make sure you know what you're getting.
There are also some variations of the truck motor to look out for. Like the flex-fuel stuff, which is capable of running on E85 (available for 5.3's) which use bigger injectors. And the Displacement On Demand (DOD) stuff, which is pretty neat.
And yes, the truck motors are a bunch less expensive. I picked up a complete 26xxx mile 2004 LQ4 6.0 for $1200. When shopping around, make sure you check around. Depending upon the area you're in, you might do real well to ship it from out of state. My engine came from Rhode Island, shipped to Baltimore for $130 (cost includes shipping an 80E trans too). My local salvage yards wanted $2500 and up for higher mileage older motors.
'JustDreamin'
2) What flexplate/torque convertor issues will I run into?
Early model truck motors (like the '99's) had a longer crank. Later model ones are the same as the cars, and therefore interchange. The longer crank was replaced by the car length crank and a spacer for certain transmissions (80E in particular).
'JustDreamin'
Trending Topics
I need to get some video up soon...
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
For the new 'buggy' thing I'm bouncing around lots of ideas. I picked up some 2.5 ton rockwell axles, both steer with 6.72 gears! I have 300' of tubing which I need to start bending at some point. I just found a TH350 bolted up to a NP203. I plan on doing a NP205 doubler case (roughly 4:1 low-low range). Here is a pick of the axles resting on some ag tires.
Anyway, I'm planning on a rear engine buggy, articulated steering at the yoke of the 205 which goes to the front axle. It should allow me to do a 110" WB and still have a turning radius
After that, 4 link front and rear suspension, air shocks and the drivers seat should set right on top of the front axle for visibility reasons. I think that sums up most of the plans which have been formed so far.I guess this is when it becomes obvious on my CJ that the engine was okay to begin with since I don't know enough about engines relative to everything else...
Early model truck motors (like the '99's) had a longer crank. Later model ones are the same as the cars, and therefore interchange. The longer crank was replaced by the car length crank and a spacer for certain transmissions (80E in particular).
'JustDreamin'
If I am mistaken in this guys, please correct me because I am planning on getting the TCI plate. Thanks
Thanks
http://www.rnrfab.com/rich/fj/da_cruzah.htm
It outta be fun as hell...
Back on topic, I've been *told" that with nothing more than the spacer & longer bolts, along with a little egging out of the holes, I can bolt my 700R4 TC right up.
So, for the sake of ease (and because I need a flexplate anyway) I am going with the TCI flexplate and will use washers as suggested by TCI to space that snout out.
thanks





