Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LT5 vs LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-2007 | 06:48 PM
  #1  
young92rsowner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming
Default LT5 vs LS1

I decided why no make another debate except not with an import engine but another chevy. imo the best engine chevy has ever made vs. another really good engine.
Old 09-22-2007 | 07:02 PM
  #2  
lt4malibu's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 2
Default

the LT5 is portly, and is way too expensive to purchase/modify... the end.
Old 09-22-2007 | 08:56 PM
  #3  
Fahrenschnell's Avatar
Launching!

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 236
Likes: 2
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Not to mention LT5's constantly overheat. LSX > LT5
Old 09-22-2007 | 10:15 PM
  #4  
young92rsowner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming
Default

ya but can the LS1 be stable at 8k? DOHC>OHV
Old 09-22-2007 | 11:21 PM
  #5  
speedyhawk101's Avatar
12 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville
Default

LT5 is definately a cool powerplant. But who needs 8k when you can make loads of power under 7k. I say no contest LSX is a superior powerplant. OHV is where it's at. Simple! Easily upgraded! Parts availability! Cheap! Plentiful! Light weight, Loads and Loads and Loads of affordable Do It Your Self Power! DOHC LT5 has none of that!
Old 09-23-2007 | 01:38 AM
  #6  
kossuth's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 969
Likes: 1
From: New Market, MD
Default

Eh, I think the LT5 is a hella good motor. Plus, it would make an awesome swap project. The thing against a LT5 is the cost and availability. The problems with the LT5 is the complicated throttle system that they had to program into the PCM in order for any midrange power to be made.
Old 09-23-2007 | 10:02 AM
  #7  
B4CZR2's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Spencerport, NY
Default

What everyone else said... LSx > LT5
Old 09-23-2007 | 12:18 PM
  #8  
slick1851's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 1
From: CHITOWN
Default

Think about it this way, fors 4V mod motor is cheaper to mod

And those things are very very expensive for NA power

Just not worth it at all


LS1 is much better
Old 09-23-2007 | 01:25 PM
  #9  
young92rsowner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming
Default

the LT5 still holds a lot of records today, the 1988 Callaway Sledgehammer reached a topspeed of 254.7mph with John Lingenfelter as the driver. The Corvette had LT5 with a twin turbo set up creating 880hp. Those who say this engine can't be modded your full of ****. 1995 Corvette ZR1 can keep up or even beat a C6 Corvette.
Old 09-23-2007 | 05:45 PM
  #10  
DBL_TKE's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 121
Likes: 1
From: Aloha, OR
Default

The heads on the LT5 can be ported to flow over 400 CFM. Let's see you do that with your stock LSx heads. The engine is just badass. It's the best sounding engine in any GM vehicle IMO. The durability of that engine is like none other.
Old 09-23-2007 | 05:59 PM
  #11  
thecorrectformula's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Delaware, OH
Default

I'll still stick with the LSX's
Old 09-23-2007 | 06:42 PM
  #12  
pist0lpete's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
From: Edmond, Oklahoma
Default

The LT5 was a great engine in concept however the problem is, it is as big and heavy as a big block but makes less or equal power with less torque and costs at least twice as much in doing so. Then you start modding it and the bost numbers keep rising. You can make as much or more power out of an LSX for less money easily. Can the LT5 handle 40 psi or more boost like the LSX block can? They are neat and highly technical engines that deserve respect but as far as an overall performance engine it just falls short. There is a reason why the Gen I small block survived from 1955 to well into the 90s in the same basic form whereas the LT5 didn't even last 10 years.
Old 09-23-2007 | 06:54 PM
  #13  
the_merv's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 19,865
Likes: 340
From: The Beach...
Default

Parts availability, cost, and power...
Take the cost of a LT5 and drop that into a LS1..wait..take the cost of a LT5, chuck the LS1 out and build a Stroker LSX with that money, see which one will have more power...
Old 09-23-2007 | 08:34 PM
  #14  
daniel6718's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 1
From: garland tx
Default

because of money its more practical to do a ls1 ls2 ls6 but for which is the better motor the lt5 byfar...even better than the ls7
Old 09-23-2007 | 08:54 PM
  #15  
99c5vert's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by young92rsowner
the LT5 still holds a lot of records today, the 1988 Callaway Sledgehammer reached a topspeed of 254.7mph with John Lingenfelter as the driver. The Corvette had LT5 with a twin turbo set up creating 880hp. Those who say this engine can't be modded your full of ****. 1995 Corvette ZR1 can keep up or even beat a C6 Corvette.
ZR1 was a consistant 13 second quarter mile car... C6's run in the 12's regularly. Also, keep in mind, you are comparing the ZR1 to the basement of the LSx architecture.

Plus, ZR1 is heavier, and takes alot more room under the hood than the LSx.

There is no comparison.
Old 09-23-2007 | 08:55 PM
  #16  
99c5vert's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

oh, and here's a direct head to head comparison C5 Z vs. C4 ZR1 - same day, same track.

http://www.corvettefever.com/feature...1_z06_shootout
Old 09-23-2007 | 08:58 PM
  #17  
JD_AMG's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 16
From: St.Charles MO
Default

Originally Posted by young92rsowner
the LT5 still holds a lot of records today, the 1988 Callaway Sledgehammer reached a topspeed of 254.7mph with John Lingenfelter as the driver. The Corvette had LT5 with a twin turbo set up creating 880hp. Those who say this engine can't be modded your full of ****. 1995 Corvette ZR1 can keep up or even beat a C6 Corvette.
The sledgehammer was a TPI powered car, the LT5 wasn't out until 1990...

The LT5 certainly can be modded, buts its not going to be cheap. And yeah, a 95 ZR1 might be able to keep up with a C6 in a strait line, but its a more expensive car (if it were new today).
Back to the simple facts, the LSx platform is lighter, cheaper, and physically smaller while being able to make the same amount of power/torque, thats why GM dropped the LT5.
Old 09-23-2007 | 08:59 PM
  #18  
the_merv's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 19,865
Likes: 340
From: The Beach...
Default

Yea..that Engine is a monster under a Hood..

There is a company that makes the LSX Heads that are 4 Valves/Cylinder that flow over 400cfm..you throw them on top of a 450ci+ LSX build..that would be insane..


I just thought of this..just a little comparison..
I don't know if it's exact, just goin off my head from what I have read..
LT5 - 400hp, 375tq, mid 13's in the Vette
LS1 - 350hp, 330tq, 12.7's in the Vette..

Then consider mods, which one would respond better..
No question there from what has been done.

I can see if the Technology was around back then like we have now, that LT5 would probably be less expensive and parts would have been made for it, but if it was that good, it would of stayed around.

Funny thing about both of them is that the Bore x Stroke is damn near the same..

Last edited by the_merv; 09-23-2007 at 09:06 PM.
Old 09-26-2007 | 08:11 AM
  #19  
C5AJ's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Sorry LSX is the more logical engine.

LT5 was great, but too big and expensive.
Old 09-26-2007 | 10:13 PM
  #20  
Red Camaro SS's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

lt5 mid 13's? from every report ive ever read they were 12.8 to 13.0 and about 330 hp to the wheels


Quick Reply: LT5 vs LS1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.