Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Wiring harness for 5.3L

Old Jul 10, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #1  
jmauld's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default Wiring harness for 5.3L

I'm picking up a 5.3L L33 tomorrow. I am planning on running a LS1 intake, DBC throttle body, and a T56 transmission.

What is the preferred wiring harness and ECU to use with this setup?

Last edited by jmauld; Jul 10, 2008 at 07:56 PM. Reason: I meant DBCable, not Wire...
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 07:38 PM
  #2  
Brismo7's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA
Default

stock
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 08:04 PM
  #3  
Ackattack1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
From: Valley Center KS
Default

I think the easiest would be a F-body w/ a 6 speed harness.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 09:46 AM
  #4  
jmauld's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

I ended up returning the 5.3L block due to a crack that I found, and now I have a 2000 LS1 from a F-body.

I've been watching for a 2000 (1999-2002) wiring harness from a F-body w/T56 and these harnesses seem to go quickly. I haven't been fast enough to get one.

I plan on shopping for the "correct" harness, but if I can't find it, what are the next easiest harnesses to adapt in order of simplicity?

1999-2002 F-body/automatic harness
1998 F-body harnesses
????
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 11:15 AM
  #5  
ryanvv355's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 756
Likes: 1
From: Hudsonville, MI
Default

1999-2002 Truck intake would be easy to adapt, just some small differences. Injectors connectors are different between truck and LS motors. The transmission wiring would be different all together, you will have to do some cutting and splicing, but the price is usually right on those harnesses. You can get the T56 connectors from a few places, just take some time and took over some diagrams, you can figure it out and adapt accordingly.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 12:23 PM
  #6  
jmauld's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

If using the earlier truck harness, is it still preferred to use the Camaro ECM, or will the truck ECM be just as adaptable?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 01:08 PM
  #7  
camrs73's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: ct
Default

speartech has standalone harnesses or can rework a factory harness
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 01:11 PM
  #8  
jmauld's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

yeah, I've got them down as an option. I'd like to give it a shot at figuring it out first, though. I know I can just jump in and do it, but I'd like to avoid any costly purchase mistakes if possible. Ie, I don't want to buy the truck harness, if I'm going to have spend more on extra connectors/wire to make it work.

Basically trying to figure out if there are any pitfalls that someone else has already found.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 01:36 PM
  #9  
bczee's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,670
Likes: 6
From: Concord, CA
Default

U can usually find the harness on eBay alot.. even some converted to stand alone ones.. I'd check the forum on any of the ones you are interested in. To see if any have used these harness by either a User or Company.

Painless is another option, as is some of the sponsors on this forum. check Currentperformance, they are one. Wait4meperformance (u already check S&P). You got a few to check with.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 06:40 PM
  #10  
ls1nova71's Avatar
TECH Veteran
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,406
Likes: 211
From: Liberty, MO
Default

Originally Posted by jmauld
If using the earlier truck harness, is it still preferred to use the Camaro ECM, or will the truck ECM be just as adaptable?
I think it depends on the year of truck PCM, but Wait4me changed my 2002 truck PCM to a Camaro tune (Ls1) and it works great.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 08:54 PM
  #11  
G-Body's Avatar
sawzall wielding director
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,147
Likes: 12
From: Downers Grove, IL
Default

The 99-02 f-body and the 99-02 trucks use the same physical PCM, it is just the programming that differs. So the PCM can be used for either application if you flash it accordingly.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2008 | 10:19 AM
  #12  
BB69's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Holly, MI
Default

Originally Posted by G-Body
The 99-02 f-body and the 99-02 trucks use the same physical PCM, it is just the programming that differs. So the PCM can be used for either application if you flash it accordingly.
This makes sense, but from what I read in one of your other posts, there are some pinout differences in the PCM. The one I am specifically concerned about is the coolant temp sensor ground on pin 63. Do the wires actually need to be changed in the harness?

Thanks
Ken
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 11:51 PM
  #13  
G-Body's Avatar
sawzall wielding director
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,147
Likes: 12
From: Downers Grove, IL
Default

I would just move the wires to match the computer as its very easy to do. I suspect that both PCM`s have multiple pins that are tied together internally and all go back to the same ground, but I do not have any evidence to confirm that.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 AM.