





Can't decide BB or LSX?
I only yawn when I see a sbc, big blocks still make me smile
even without playing with them, the aura of a big block just feels right...sitting there with a loping cam, blipping the throttle and the whole car torquing over, the rumble and instant torque off idle
it just makes me smile
but of course in the next couple weeks when I finally get to start my ls1, my opinion might start to change some
http://www.rascalsrodsandcustoms.com...showpage&pid=1
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Also the Chevelle has a full frame and has a better structure and support for a big block. You can put subframe connectors on but in my opinion Camaros should be small block cars since they are a unibody. I know tons of people run big blocks and love it, If you are pushing that big block in your camaro you will be punishing the car. There are all types of problems like twisting the body so the doors and properly shut from launching. Usually in drag cars but I have heard of street cars having similar problems.
I am very excited to get the LS2 swap done in my chevelle. Hope some of my experience helps. Very excited to have more of a daily driver car again. It depends on what you are looking to do with the car and your expectations. I know the LSXs can make every bit of power the big blocks can but there is something sweet about seeing that huge *** engine between the fenders. Either way you will be happy.
I removed the 468 monster that I had on my Chevelle, mainly because somebody offered to buy it.
But truth be told I was contemplating swapping a "newer" Vortec headed small block into it. I know this sounds crazy, why would I do that? The fact is that I used to enjoy my 350 mild build on my Nova than my BBC 70 Chevelle, and way more often.
Yes I went a bit overboard in my choice of cam and induction (Team G with a 1150 Dominator) and the exhaust always "made you cry" with the rich fumes, the torque was fenomenal, and I had a NOS Big Shot system too, but I could never spray the thing because it only would have increased my traction problems.
I also had an old shool Muncie M-22, Rammetallic sixpaddle clutch and 2800 lbs press. plate. It sounded and looked terrifying, I beat up many guys without racing, only by opening the hood -which honestly was a good thing since with no traction all the power in the world means nothing.
Desktop dyno predicted 620hp before the spray (sorry no real dynos in Sonora).
I'm sorry if I am ranting, but I had to jump in.
When I had the money for the BBC in my pocket I started looking at the LSX option, and sure I got an '02 LQ9, I am getting there, I barely have time to work on the thing, but once I made up my mind I am enjoying every minute of it, I cannot wait to go and work with the harness and all these things.
Now, my new goal, and the final test, is to drive about 7 hours (from Phoenix, AZ, to Hermosillo, Sonora) and beat my buddy's BBC 69 Chevelle, call it revenge because he got me first. And I hope to do it this summer.
Go bold, embrace the dark side.. I mean the new! go LSX!
Luis H. Corbala
Phoenix, AZ
70 Chevelle
6.0 LQ9 GMPP intake, Edelbrock 3848 elbow, NOS Cheater, long tube headers, stock everything else (so far)
i have two big block muscle cars.. a 66 impala ss and a 32 roadster with a stack injected 454... and after having tried the smooth power if an ls based engine im NEVER building another BBC, its expensive heavy and hairchested rough to drive.. with the LS you get better manners, cheaper parts and less weight AND you get more power and better mileage...
but if fun is rough... put in a 25x degree cam with 62x list and 110 LS in an LS7 and see power few big blocks can match....
the only reason i can think of to put a big block instead of an LS based engine in a 1. gen was to make it look stock...

That's why I vote Stroker LSX..I have a very simple build and it's pretty fckn nasty for what it is.


