Corvette Performance
C5 | Z06 | C6 | ZR1 | C7

ss3200 or ss3600 ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2013 | 04:40 PM
  #1  
spawncba's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default ss3200 or ss3600 ...

I have a 97 C5 A4, replacing tranny with RPM stage 4 and was considering either a yank ss3200 or ss3600. I will not be changing gears. Any one with a similar setup have any insight as to if the 3600 will be too much? I am leaning towards that one.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2013 | 02:45 PM
  #2  
spawncba's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

I guess I forgot to mention I have 2.73's. I don't mind some slipping due to higher stall. Any one has any personal experience with lower gears/higher stall? Thank you guys.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 06:59 AM
  #3  
Larry's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Land, TX
Default

I had the SS3200 in my 08 Corvette. It makes for a great street converter but if you want to track the car then look into a looser converter. I would personally keep the 2.73 gearing and get the right stall converter. The SS4000 would even be a better choice if you track the car.

I had a PI 3600 in my 98 Camaro. It was about the equivalent of the Yank 4000. For me a little to loose for the street. For some ok for street. Sure made up for it at the track! Over .5 second et improvement.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 06:33 PM
  #4  
thepitstop2010's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Dayton,Ohio
Default

I'm running a ss3600 and could not be happier... I would recommend the 3600. Nothing worse than regretting on not going bigger when you begin modding!
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 09:56 AM
  #5  
RonSSNova's Avatar
8 Second Club
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 814
From: Portland, OR
Default

I have the SS3600 in my C5 with 3.42 gears. I love it, but it slips and slides all the time. Makes you drive with a soft touch.
On flat ground, its fine. But any little hill, and the rpm are at 2500-3000 depending on how hard you push on the gas.

It will cost you some city mpg for sure.

What is the goal with the car?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 11:51 PM
  #6  
desertLS1's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,278
Likes: 1
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

I Have a Yank PT4000 in my 3.15 geared coupe.

It's worlds better (tighter) than the SS3600 in my 02 SS

The lighter car makes it feel tighter. Much more pleasant to drive.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2013 | 05:08 AM
  #7  
SickC5's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

I have an ss3600 with 3.42s. I've cut 1.5 60' with it before and before and I'm only an exhaust and intake guy. As Ron mentioned you will sacrifice some mpg in the city, but other than that I have no complaints. It's still a relatively tight converter.

Jw, why're you keeping the 2.73s. It's a breeze to change the gears at the same time whilst doing the stall.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2013 | 12:07 PM
  #8  
thepitstop2010's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Dayton,Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by SickC5
I have an ss3600 with 3.42s. I've cut 1.5 60' with it before and before and I'm only an exhaust and intake guy. As Ron mentioned you will sacrifice some mpg in the city, but other than that I have no complaints. It's still a relatively tight converter.

Jw, why're you keeping the 2.73s. It's a breeze to change the gears at the same time whilst doing the stall.
I love my ss3600 and the 3.42's....best mods of my car!
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 AM.