Is there any truth in the C5 drivetrain robbing power?
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 4
From: Valrico, Florida
Is there any truth in the C5 drivetrain robbing power? I have heard many C5 owners saying that the C5 drivetrain robs more power the the F-bodies. Is this true?
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 4
From: Valrico, Florida
Originally Posted by slt200mph
Yes it is true...the rear axle in the f Body cars uses less horse power the IRS... 
When the 2002 Z06 come out our corvette club had a GM engineer from the LS1 platform talk about the changes, improvements, etc. He mentioned that the drive train loss was about 12-13%, as I recall. This would equate to 350-360 RWHP.
Last edited by Gordy M; Sep 13, 2004 at 04:00 PM.
Trending Topics
They do not put it down any better.... especially if they have the Badyear run flat tires on them....they weigh less than the f body...end of story... if you check the dyno numbers the f body does better time after time..the IRS is the difference... 
if you check the dyno numbers the f body does better time after time..the IRS is the difference... LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,234
Likes: 1
From: Mississauga, Ontario
Originally Posted by slt200mph
They do not put it down any better.... especially if they have the Badyear run flat tires on them....they weigh less than the f body...end of story... if you check the dyno numbers the f body does better time after time..the IRS is the difference...
if you check the dyno numbers the f body does better time after time..the IRS is the difference... I was getting better 60fts at the track this weekend compared to the automatic f-bodies there. My best of the day was 1.98 on the runcraps.
And the Colonel has cut 1.8 60fts on his runcrap tires in his C5. The C5 definitely puts it's power to the ground better.
Originally Posted by Patman
I was getting better 60fts at the track this weekend compared to the automatic f-bodies there. My best of the day was 1.98 on the runcraps.
And the Colonel has cut 1.8 60fts on his runcrap tires in his C5. The C5 definitely puts it's power to the ground better.
And the Colonel has cut 1.8 60fts on his runcrap tires in his C5. The C5 definitely puts it's power to the ground better.
TECH Addict
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
From: St Louis, MO
How is that proof? I've never seen the same motor dynoed in both chassis. A few people have had the opportunity but didnt post before/after numbers. Thats what it would really take to compare them.
Even assuming the C5 has more drivetrain loss, I'll bet they are equal once you put a rear end in an f-body that can handle any amount of power.
Even assuming the C5 has more drivetrain loss, I'll bet they are equal once you put a rear end in an f-body that can handle any amount of power.
I have proof from the race cars back to back, same motor from chassis dyno to engine dyno and the loss is less than 15%. Obviously, you all would love to know what it makes, but I cant say 
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,234
Likes: 1
From: Mississauga, Ontario
Originally Posted by DMNSPD
Would you say it's putting power to the ground better meaning it's making hp numbers to the ground better or it's getting better traction? I'll choose the latter...
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 4
From: Valrico, Florida
My test results were with swapping a 408ci from a F-body to a Y-body and the #'s were lower, but several things were different, i.e., headers, bigger cam, no shortbelt this time, less aggressive tune. We were hoping for around the same numbers as before and I think I got them, but my supporting hardware was not there. I will need some custom Kooks with longer primaries for one and a more aggressive tune.
Launching!
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu-Hi
It's something like 8% for 6 speeds and 13% for autos.It's not just the IRS,but the torque tube,and tranny also.The torque tube is way bigger than a drive shaft.And 2001 c5s have more hp than 97-99s.So dynos are all over the place with different years.But you all know how it goes,dynos don't win races.And run-craps suck like mentioned above.I weighed my rear Y2Ks with run flats before i tossed them,62 lbs for one rear tire/rim and wheel sensor.
Also C5 autos have 2:73 or 3:15 gears compaired to the f-body autos with 3:23s
Also C5 autos have 2:73 or 3:15 gears compaired to the f-body autos with 3:23s
Originally Posted by Patman
I mean it's hooking up better. The suspension on the C5 is definitely better.
Launching!
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu-Hi
Originally Posted by 66ImpalaLT1
The spinning shaft inside the torque tube is a lot smaller and lighter than an f-body's driveshaft.
Staging Lane
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, IL
Originally Posted by 66ImpalaLT1
How is that proof? I've never seen the same motor dynoed in both chassis. A few people have had the opportunity but didnt post before/after numbers. Thats what it would really take to compare them.
Even assuming the C5 has more drivetrain loss, I'll bet they are equal once you put a rear end in an f-body that can handle any amount of power.
Even assuming the C5 has more drivetrain loss, I'll bet they are equal once you put a rear end in an f-body that can handle any amount of power.
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 0
From: katy, tx
I would say that it is between 12% to 15% for a standard. The f-body is 12% (6-speed), so if there is a difference, it is minimal. Let's say for arguement the difference is 3%, that would equate to 10.5 rwhp for a stock 350 hp LS1 motor. The Corvette weighs around 400 - 500 lbs less than an f-body! That more than makes up for 10 or 11 rwhp.