FLP header dyno results
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
FLP header dyno results First, I had heads/cam/stock manifolds with MTI tuning. That is the blue line.
Then, I installed FLP headers, put 500 miles on the combo to give it time to adjust, and dyno'd. That is the red line. It had some knock retard due to too much timing in the program.
So, while sitting on the dyno, I dyno tuned it with LS1edit and my laptop, and that is the green line.
All dyno's were done through the stock Z06 mufflers.
<img src="http://home.austin.rr.com/tyr/c5/headers_tuning_comparison.jpg" alt=" - " />
Then, I installed FLP headers, put 500 miles on the combo to give it time to adjust, and dyno'd. That is the red line. It had some knock retard due to too much timing in the program.
So, while sitting on the dyno, I dyno tuned it with LS1edit and my laptop, and that is the green line.
All dyno's were done through the stock Z06 mufflers.
<img src="http://home.austin.rr.com/tyr/c5/headers_tuning_comparison.jpg" alt=" - " />
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx.
Re: FLP header dyno results I think these are good numbers. But for some reason, once you got headers, I thought you would have gotten more. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> You did gain a substantial amout of tourque from 3.5k to 5k tho. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Re: FLP header dyno results I personally think those are very good numbers. 26 rwhp more is alot harder to do than people think. What I also liked was the fact that it pickup up alot more through the midrange especially from 3200 RPM's on up. JMX could you please tell me what your final A/F Ratio was after tuning. Also what tables are you using to tune, I basically use the PE table and the high octane spark advance table. Thanks for the info and hope to see the FLP Install on your website soon.
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
From: Corona CA
Re: FLP header dyno results Biggest gains were mid-range gains. His area under the curve from 4000-6000 looks like it picked up an AVERAGE of 30rwhp. Big gain.
<small>[ March 04, 2003, 09:13 AM: Message edited by: McRat ]</small>
<small>[ March 04, 2003, 09:13 AM: Message edited by: McRat ]</small>
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Re: FLP header dyno results minivette, dont worry, I was hoping for the same thing. The only heads/cam ls1 I know of that's dyno'd more than this at our dyno is an MTI LS6 combo that did 424rwhp through borla stingers, so I guess I shouldn't be too worried.
Anyways, the final A/F ratio is here (its the RED line on the graph), and the final timing table was set to 27 at peak torque, then faded up to 28.5 by redline.
<img src="http://home.austin.rr.com/tyr/c5/final_af.jpg" alt=" - " />
<small>[ March 04, 2003, 01:28 PM: Message edited by: jmX ]</small>
Anyways, the final A/F ratio is here (its the RED line on the graph), and the final timing table was set to 27 at peak torque, then faded up to 28.5 by redline.
<img src="http://home.austin.rr.com/tyr/c5/final_af.jpg" alt=" - " />
<small>[ March 04, 2003, 01:28 PM: Message edited by: jmX ]</small>
Staging Lane
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga, ONTARIO
Re: FLP header dyno results </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by minivette:
<strong> I think these are good numbers. But for some reason, once you got headers, I thought you would have gotten more. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">just curious, but how much more do u think he should of got???
those are SOLID GAINS
cant see headers giving much more than that for the most part, especially in the heart of the powerband. i think u would be fooling yourself if u think he could of got more....JMO
<strong> I think these are good numbers. But for some reason, once you got headers, I thought you would have gotten more. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">just curious, but how much more do u think he should of got???
those are SOLID GAINS
cant see headers giving much more than that for the most part, especially in the heart of the powerband. i think u would be fooling yourself if u think he could of got more....JMO
Trending Topics
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx.
Re: FLP header dyno results I thought that his stock manifolds were really, really holding him back. I thought that once he went to headers he would have hit 410-415hp+ and closer to 400tq. before tuning.
<small>[ March 06, 2003, 09:54 PM: Message edited by: minivette ]</small>
<small>[ March 06, 2003, 09:54 PM: Message edited by: minivette ]</small>
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0
Brett Foote
