2000 C5 Bone Stock Dyno
2000 C5 Bone Stock Dyno Told you guys I would get a dyno, the sheet is being scanned in ATM, I will have it posted. Car is bone stock down to the filter, running 92 octane pump, and it passes Cali Smog:
311rwhp, 326rwtq
Not bad!
311rwhp, 326rwtq
Not bad!
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?
Pouria Savadkouei
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
did you get some kr around 4350rpm??? also looks like it could be leaned out just a tad above 5100rpm, and up the timing over 4500 if no kr is present..... just my $.02...... looks like some bolt ons and a good tune would really wake that thing up, nice numbers for a ca car 
Originally Posted by Assassin
nice numbers for a ca car
It was from California. I live in Eugene, OR. No emissions...... I just put that there to show how much MORE restrictions are in it. Next dyno sheet will be with my 150 wet shot up and going, 160 t-stat, Vararam, Torquer V.2 cam, and a PCM tune from Texas-Speed. Should be a lil bit better.
But thanks for the comments guys!
Originally Posted by Assassin
please at least gut the cats(and delete rear o2's) before the n2o dyno run....
Gonna do it, depending on how much of a pain in the *** it is. In 2 months I plan on getting LT's anyways.
easiest way is to cut the pipes behind the cats, knock them out w/ small pipe and hammer then weld back together, dont have the exhaust pointing at anything fragile when you first start it up again just to be safe... its quite easy if you have a mig and a recipricating saw...
TECH Addict
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 14
From: England
Originally Posted by HolyShiznit
If you note along the top of the graph it's a Dynojet, these are non load bearing dyno's and generally giver higher numbers compared to manufacture numbers. Plus it also says "uncorrected" which means these arn't SAE numbers. The "graph smoothing" grade will also effect the numbers.
If you converted them to what a load bearing dyno would generate (Mustang Dyno or Dynodynamics, or Rototest) and corrected to SAE your car would be some where between 290-300rwhp which is BANG on where it should be.
As I say nice numbers, and I only offer this explanation as others have commented on it being 'strong' for a Corvette.
Good explanation for those that didn't already know that. We run uncorrected because that's what the car is making to the wheels, right then at that time. No weird corrections, no goofy dyno tricks. Also, coming from the turbo world, on DynoJets it is common practice to run uncorrected numbers. It is never a good idea to compare dyno numbers from different dynos. This dyno is the one that everyone within 250 miles of me uses so the numbers I get from there are accurate for the other cars in the area.
So while it may not be "strong" for an LS1 it does show that the motor is healthy which is what I wanted to know anyways.
Trap speed > Dyno numbers anyways
So while it may not be "strong" for an LS1 it does show that the motor is healthy which is what I wanted to know anyways.
Trap speed > Dyno numbers anyways
