is a TSP231/237 112 too much cam for a C5
Iv not done my gas mileage yet but i no its not close to stock but im running 42# injectors tho and my cam is alot bigger that the f13 im guessing its 20 on the freeway ,but intown it sucks kinda Last edited by ditty24; Aug 7, 2006 at 11:26 PM.
i hope to get the car soon so i can sleep again, lol. i've got car fever bad.
my truck is fine, it's just not what i want. i'm going to get a 75 chevy luv for a work truck and the c5 for the weekends.
Trending Topics
that's one that i really liked
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
It's in the tuning.
Werd. It's all in the tuning for sure.
I'm running about 650 lift......and my car has NEAR stock driveability. My gas mileage in all my cars has always sucked so, I gave up on the whole fuel consumption thing when I had my first 5.0
I don't like cams bigger than 230/230 for daily drivers. The 'gains' in peak HP aren't worth the drivability hassles in my opinion.

I don't like cams bigger than 230/230 for daily drivers. The 'gains' in peak HP aren't worth the drivability hassles in my opinion.
I don't like cams bigger than 230/230 for daily drivers. The 'gains' in peak HP aren't worth the drivability hassles in my opinion.
by saying i like the way it sounds doesn't always mean i'm talking about the idle.
that cam also revs quick and i like the power band. I also like the fact that it's power band starts at 1700 rpm. please don't be so quick to call me stupid, MR. ADMINISTRATOR, lol.
SigForty, I had the same cam in my silver Formula. It was "drivable", but not nearly as drivable as the 224/224, 228/228, 232/232, 221/221, 230/227 etc... type cams I've had. The car still had that low mph bucking and dead zones in the lower rpm band. I guess I prefer my cars to not have any issues at all, because its usually only a difference of 10 hp between drivable and quirky.
It's towards the bottom.

