Corvette Performance
C5 | Z06 | C6 | ZR1 | C7

LG vs Kooks headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2008, 09:45 PM
  #21  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
zrocket_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i say kooks all the way, that is what i run and love them.
Old 02-17-2008, 04:25 PM
  #22  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by YO-EL
My experience has been up to 3500 rpms most of these headers are the same..
From 3500-7000 rpms is where the KOOKS will out pull, giving almost a .1 quicker ET, which is huge...
You swapped and gained .1?
Old 02-18-2008, 09:33 AM
  #23  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
YO-EL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phila PA
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
You swapped and gained .1?
My actual ET gain was about .06..
On the dyno it was 8 RWHP & 8 TQ more from 3500 up to 7000 rpms.
KOOKS in RED
LG in Blue


Last edited by YO-EL; 02-18-2008 at 09:38 AM.
Old 02-19-2008, 07:41 AM
  #24  
12 Second Club
 
PA Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sigforty
You are going to hear all different opinions from all kinds of different people on headers. I personally choose my LG pros for my 01 Z06 and have been happy with the quality and performance of the product. I think in the end you are splitting hairs trying to compare power outs of one header versus another. The kooks will probably work better on the top end for drag racing, and the LGs should have more low end and torque production for road racing or street use. I would suggest which ever one you choose go with 1 7/8 inch primaries for the Ls7 though.
I agree, but I dealt with LG over a customer service issue and they rocked
Old 02-19-2008, 08:30 AM
  #25  
Launching!
 
blown4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by YO-EL
My actual ET gain was about .06..
On the dyno it was 8 RWHP & 8 TQ more from 3500 up to 7000 rpms.
KOOKS in RED
LG in Blue
Were these pulls done on the same day?
Old 02-19-2008, 09:26 AM
  #26  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Louis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Frisco/Wylie
Posts: 4,168
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Show the whole graph, and run details, as well as when they were made
Old 02-19-2008, 10:37 AM
  #27  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
YO-EL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phila PA
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Louis
Show the whole graph, and run details, as well as when they were made
No problem...
Here it is...
The BLUE LG pull was done in the morning, and the RED KOOKS pull was done about 4 hrs later after removal of the LG's & install of the KOOKS...

On subsequent runs compared to the last 3 yrs w/ the LG's, in comparable DA, I DID pick up .05-.07 ET with the KOOKS headers, with NO other changes.
None of the new KOOKS runs were EVER any slower than ANY of my LG runs.
They were always .05 or quicker ET..

Old 02-19-2008, 03:19 PM
  #28  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
07 Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for everyone's input. After talking to both companies about my application and looking at the dyno results I will go with Kooks. Both headers seem to perform well, but I think Kooks will work better for me.



Quick Reply: LG vs Kooks headers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 AM.