LG Pro Headers or American Racing?
Give me a call or PM i can get you a set of ARH.
The BLUE LG pull was done in the morning, and the RED KOOKS pull was done about 4 hrs later after removal of the LG's & install of the KOOKS...
On subsequent runs compared to the last 3 yrs w/ the LG's, in comparable DA, I DID pick up .05-.07 ET with the KOOKS headers, with NO other changes.
None of the new KOOKS runs were EVER any slower than ANY of my LG runs.
They were always .05 or quicker ET..
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
That's kind of wild bro. You started this thread which header should I get, LG Pros, or ARH ??
Then you go with Kooks ?? Either way you did get a good set of headers. How was fitment, and how do you like them ?? Do you have before and after numbers overlayed so we can see where and how much power you picked up ?? Wish you'd have went with the LG Pros, but you can't go wrong with any of the top 3 brands IMO. LG Pros, Kooks, or ARH are all top notch.
I wouldn't put 1 7/8" on a stock displacement myself, but for pure 1/4 mile performance, they will have higher peak numbers and will perform a little better.
Obviously, on an ls6 headed, stock cammed setup they will sacrifice area under the curve and low end throttle response and street performance.
But the OP specifically stated he believed they would be better for top end and 1/4 mile, which has been the case for those who use them.
Then you go with Kooks ?? Either way you did get a good set of headers. How was fitment, and how do you like them ?? Do you have before and after numbers overlayed so we can see where and how much power you picked up ?? Wish you'd have went with the LG Pros, but you can't go wrong with any of the top 3 brands IMO. LG Pros, Kooks, or ARH are all top notch.
I decided to go with Kooks because all the research I found seems to show them being the best for 1/4 mile performance.
I was going to go with LG's but I couldn't find any proof out there that they really were the best headers. So I decided to pocket the $500 difference.
Like you said they are all great quality, but for the price Kooks ended up making the most sense.
Last edited by SERB Z06; Jun 17, 2008 at 11:51 PM.
In everything I've seen, your heads determine what sort of headers you need. Exhaust flow, exhaust valve size, and exhaust port size all contribute to what sort of header you need (moreso than a generic formula to determine primary length or size).
I'll say that AFR 205s really do work better with LGs, because the exhaust port is 85cc and has a large 1.60" exhaust valve. Remember, the TFS 235 has an 86cc port with 1.60" valves and its designed for 427cid. Either way, the LGs help get the flow up in the exhaust port, thus making a ton more power at 4k (but similar at 3.5k and 4.5k). This also happens with the LS7 and L92 heads (weak flow in a large port).
On TFS heads or ETP or any head that has a relatively small exhaust port with high flow numbers, the difference is moot between all of them. If anything, the shorter primary design can help evacuate the already quickly escaping exhaust moreso than very long primaries, thus making more power without really losing any torque.
Also, if you look at LG's website with all of their comparisons, you see the LG header making a big jump at 4k and the other headers looking relatively flat with a slight incline from 3k to 4.5k. I've never actually seen that on any dyno on LS1tech or CF for the other headers. They generally like to ramp up around there too (more of an intake manifold design restriction). I've also never seen that jump at 4k except on stock heads and AFR 205s for the LGs. On most independent dynos, the LG's ramp up very hard at 4.5k on head/cam cars (not just cam-only). But, so do Kooks and ARH (maybe not quite as hard), but the peak torque numbers are very close in that 500 RPM window from 4500-5000. Independent graphs show pretty much a very similar torque curve most of the time (such as YO-ELs).
So, there are cases where each header simply works better.







