Quickest LS1 / LS6 STOCK INTERNALS List - 11.74 bump!
12-28-2009, 07:15 AM
#23
Guys,
Sharpe has stepped up to take over the SI list. The military keeps me pretty busy these days, so hopefully he can keep up a little better than I have over the past couple months.
It's been fun, but after 8+ years it's time for some new blood
Sharpe has stepped up to take over the SI list. The military keeps me pretty busy these days, so hopefully he can keep up a little better than I have over the past couple months.
It's been fun, but after 8+ years it's time for some new blood
12-28-2009, 12:32 PM
#24
And John, thank you so much for having handled this list so well over the years and more importantly, thank you so much for your service to our great nation,
it is MUCH appreciated. 
12-31-2009, 01:01 AM
#28
01-01-2010, 03:06 AM
#30
Also, C5 Z06s ('02-'04) were rated even higher (405hp) than the C6 LS2s (400hp) which weighed more as well so it is somewhat fair that they be listed together.
I do agree that having a 345hp C5 LS1 car with 2.73 gears (automatic) on the very same list with say, a 436hp C6 LS3 with 3.42 gears (manual) might appear a little askew though.
If the list were to really be broken down with that kind of detail though then the C5 LS1s would have to be separated from the C5 Z06 LS6s and the C6 LS2s would be separate from the C6 LS3s and then the Z51 guys will want their own list and then the red cars will need to be separated from the guys with blue cars
...where will it all end LOL. 
I don't necessarily disagree with ya at all, just stating why it may be what it is.
01-01-2010, 07:31 AM
#31
I'm thinking that it might have something to do with the C6 Z06 having a 427 where as the heavier base C6s have a 364 (or a 376 in the case of the LS3 (none on the list yet)) making them much closer in displacement to the LS1/LS6 C5s and their 346s.
Also, C5 Z06s ('02-'04) were rated even higher (405hp) than the C6 LS2s (400hp) which weighed more as well so it is somewhat fair that they be listed together.
I do agree that having a 345hp C5 LS1 car with 2.73 gears (automatic) on the very same list with say, a 436hp C6 LS3 with 3.42 gears (manual) might appear a little askew though.
If the list were to really be broken down with that kind of detail though then the C5 LS1s would have to be separated from the C5 Z06 LS6s and the C6 LS2s would be separate from the C6 LS3s and then the Z51 guys will want their own list and then the red cars will need to be separated from the guys with blue cars ...where will it all end LOL.
I don't necessarily disagree with ya at all, just stating why it may be what it is.
Also, C5 Z06s ('02-'04) were rated even higher (405hp) than the C6 LS2s (400hp) which weighed more as well so it is somewhat fair that they be listed together.
I do agree that having a 345hp C5 LS1 car with 2.73 gears (automatic) on the very same list with say, a 436hp C6 LS3 with 3.42 gears (manual) might appear a little askew though.
If the list were to really be broken down with that kind of detail though then the C5 LS1s would have to be separated from the C5 Z06 LS6s and the C6 LS2s would be separate from the C6 LS3s and then the Z51 guys will want their own list and then the red cars will need to be separated from the guys with blue cars
...where will it all end LOL. I don't necessarily disagree with ya at all, just stating why it may be what it is.
01-01-2010, 01:42 PM
#32
11 Second Club
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ky
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm thinking that it might have something to do with the C6 Z06 having a 427 where as the heavier base C6s have a 364 (or a 376 in the case of the LS3 (none on the list yet)) making them much closer in displacement to the LS1/LS6 C5s and their 346s.
Also, C5 Z06s ('02-'04) were rated even higher (405hp) than the C6 LS2s (400hp) which weighed more as well so it is somewhat fair that they be listed together.
I do agree that having a 345hp C5 LS1 car with 2.73 gears (automatic) on the very same list with say, a 436hp C6 LS3 with 3.42 gears (manual) might appear a little askew though.
If the list were to really be broken down with that kind of detail though then the C5 LS1s would have to be separated from the C5 Z06 LS6s and the C6 LS2s would be separate from the C6 LS3s and then the Z51 guys will want their own list and then the red cars will need to be separated from the guys with blue cars ...where will it all end LOL.
I don't necessarily disagree with ya at all, just stating why it may be what it is.
Also, C5 Z06s ('02-'04) were rated even higher (405hp) than the C6 LS2s (400hp) which weighed more as well so it is somewhat fair that they be listed together.
I do agree that having a 345hp C5 LS1 car with 2.73 gears (automatic) on the very same list with say, a 436hp C6 LS3 with 3.42 gears (manual) might appear a little askew though.
If the list were to really be broken down with that kind of detail though then the C5 LS1s would have to be separated from the C5 Z06 LS6s and the C6 LS2s would be separate from the C6 LS3s and then the Z51 guys will want their own list and then the red cars will need to be separated from the guys with blue cars
...where will it all end LOL. I don't necessarily disagree with ya at all, just stating why it may be what it is.
Last edited by Dragman; 02-24-2010 at 09:44 AM.
