Removed l92's for t.f.s 235's + and went to track.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2010, 10:55 AM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (24)
 
BES Stroked Nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lawrenceburg Indiana
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

how high you reving the L92 setup with a victor jr? I would at least hope 7500 or so with that size of camshaft, unless your 105 lsa on the cam, which i dont even think you could get a on that kind of lsa cause I had a rough time getting a camshaft for mine on a 107lsa, and mine still makes peak power at 7500, and rev's to 8k. GMPP L92 intake(JUNK)

I'd say with the proper custom cam, match to make power where the l92's and victor jr setup wants too, you would be in the same ball park as your current setup.


but in the end, as long as your happy with the setup, and how its running, thats all that matters!
Old 11-10-2010, 11:41 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
1lejohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My point exactly. You spent $$$ for 2 tenths and your back to fine tuning this combo. I did tell you nice gains. I know what it takes to run a 10 sec car( not directed to OP). Good Luck with the new combo. I agree that the TF heads have more potential then the 92's. I misunderstood what you were stating. Some other people post on here so that others will go buy the flavor of the month. I'm just a saying. It's tough making street legal cars run the number. I would like to see some one really find the peak of the 92's.

Last edited by 1lejohn; 11-10-2010 at 11:53 AM.
Old 11-10-2010, 04:53 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (24)
 
BES Stroked Nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lawrenceburg Indiana
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 1lejohn
My point exactly. You spent $$$ for 2 tenths and your back to fine tuning this combo. I did tell you nice gains. I know what it takes to run a 10 sec car( not directed to OP). Good Luck with the new combo. I agree that the TF heads have more potential then the 92's. I misunderstood what you were stating. Some other people post on here so that others will go buy the flavor of the month. I'm just a saying. It's tough making street legal cars run the number. I would like to see some one really find the peak of the 92's.
well, I think i found about the limit of a stock 6.0L short with L92's. I have made some posts about the setup, but its street driven, put the slicks on and it runs bottom 11's 10.90's. I wouldnt call it peak, but about the most your going to get out of mostly stock parts, on pump gas. hell I didnt even have a victor jr l92, and I am running the ultra low elbow
Old 11-10-2010, 07:52 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
1lejohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thats good for a stock build. I'm looking for an all out build. Soild rolller lite weight car etc.
Old 11-10-2010, 08:37 PM
  #25  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I have no clue on DA this or that. I will only go to the track in 65 ish deg weather,not too cold or too hot. Also,when i sold all my other parts I didn't spend much over $1,000 bucks for this new combo.

BRIAN-With new slicks i could of hit 10.5 or if i had a roll cage and didn't get kicked out after two runs. I could of played with the shocks and i was running 16psi in the slicks. less air might of helped. YES,i do need the heads and intake port matched. I just do not want to pull the heads again ti'll the 427ci is done. I'm tired and wore out on this car for a bit. I have thought about it hard.
BES NOVA- I shifted the l92 set up around 7,200-7,300 and this set up at 6,500-6,600.
And i do think people do forget,this is a 3,480lbs car and i'm 225lbs in it . thats 3,700lbs with my fat *** in it. Doed the car need a diet,or do i.
It is hard to gain when you're already in the 10's.
Old 11-11-2010, 08:04 AM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
1lejohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good Luck with the 427. Yes it seems that you hit a wall with these cars when you run in the mid 10's. The next step seems weight reduction, trans swaps etc. All these make the car less streetable.Oh you could always go the FI route.
Old 11-11-2010, 10:53 AM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (24)
 
BES Stroked Nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lawrenceburg Indiana
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 1lejohn
Thats good for a stock build. I'm looking for an all out build. Soild rolller lite weight car etc.
i didnt think the L92's would hold up to the size of camshaft and solid roller spring i needed to use, so I went with a set of the all pro hurricane castings. I didnt want to worry about the heads falling apart when I apply the nitrous.

just a little back ground. its a 418, 6.0L block iron block. solid roller, t&d shafts, the all pro hurricane heads, with a little port work, they came in a 225's, now are 235's. port matched super victor. about 13.to1. pretty aggressive camshaft, but no valve spring eater. Made a touch over 720hp NA without the vacuum pump, and some 1.3/4 dyno headers(my 2" kooks wouldnt clear the dyno)

it will be going into a sub 3k lb car, faceplated 6 speed etc etc....

i will be starting a build thread in the next few weeks! so be looking for it
Old 11-11-2010, 11:29 AM
  #28  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
SMOKNSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BES Stroked Nova
just a little back ground. its a 418, 6.0L block iron block. solid roller, t&d shafts, the all pro hurricane heads, with a little port work, they came in a 225's, now are 235's. port matched super victor. about 13.to1. pretty aggressive camshaft, but no valve spring eater. Made a touch over 720hp NA without the vacuum pump, and some 1.3/4 dyno headers(my 2" kooks wouldnt clear the dyno)

it will be going into a sub 3k lb car, faceplated 6 speed etc etc....

i will be starting a build thread in the next few weeks! so be looking for it

Now THATS a bad *** build!!!
Old 11-12-2010, 07:04 AM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
1lejohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Makes sense to me. I already have had an LS6 casting develope pin holes in it.
Old 11-15-2010, 10:00 AM
  #30  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
offaxis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: L-Town N.Y.
Posts: 2,062
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Great times man congrats!
Old 11-28-2010, 05:22 PM
  #31  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
lt1773's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

nice time
Old 01-02-2011, 11:39 AM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 3pedals
I actually dont see a huge difference. there are enough variables in the diferent setups to make the 3mph difference. comp, intake, cam.....
NO DISRESPECT to the TFS heads at all, I am just REALLY impressed with the performance of ported oem truck heads!
What he said.



Quick Reply: Removed l92's for t.f.s 235's + and went to track.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 AM.