12.01 bolt-on auto camaro(no power adder/headers)
01-12-2012, 08:16 PM
#82
TECH Fanatic
You probably missed it, but I have have just a teeny tiny bit of track time. I will challange you to learn to accept the fact that, from time to time, people are going to question claim's that you make. Not just on this forum, but in your everyday life. If you claim to have done something that falls outside of the norm, someone may say "That doesn't sound right". Getting hostile or overly defensive won't help anything. Explanation will. Several people who did not become emotionaly involved in this thread, took the time to point out the favorable track conditions. I, myself, did not take that fact into consideration. And now I have. Your car, on that particular track, on that particular day, had a good trap speed given the mod's you claim. My car is considerably quicker, not a brag, just a fact. So it's not like you beat me in a race and me calling you a cheater.There are an uncountable number of cars on this forum, that would chew me up and spit me out and not even break a sweat. There is always someone quicker. And trust me. I will not be the only person who will ever question something that you have done.
01-12-2012, 08:39 PM
#83
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You probably missed it, but I have have just a teeny tiny bit of track time. I will challange you to learn to accept the fact that, from time to time, people are going to question claim's that you make. Not just on this forum, but in your everyday life. If you claim to have done something that falls outside of the norm, someone may say "That doesn't sound right". Getting hostile or overly defensive won't help anything. Explanation will. Several people who did not become emotionaly involved in this thread, took the time to point out the favorable track conditions. I, myself, did not take that fact into consideration. And now I have. Your car, on that particular track, on that particular day, had a good trap speed given the mod's you claim. My car is considerably quicker, not a brag, just a fact. So it's not like you beat me in a race and me calling you a cheater.There are an uncountable number of cars on this forum, that would chew me up and spit me out and not even break a sweat. There is always someone quicker. And trust me. I will not be the only person who will ever question something that you have done.
Not sure if you're referring to my car or OPs car, but mine is a consistent 12.5-12.6 car at -500 to +300' DA, and 12.7 car above that (hopefully 2 tenths quicker after last weekends header install). Look man, I'm usually the first one to call BS on someone, not just here but on other forums as well. But the crap that you spewed to justify your skepticism was honestly making several of us suspect you of trolling.
01-12-2012, 08:43 PM
#84
You probably missed it, but I have have just a teeny tiny bit of track time. I will challange you to learn to accept the fact that, from time to time, people are going to question claim's that you make. Not just on this forum, but in your everyday life. If you claim to have done something that falls outside of the norm, someone may say "That doesn't sound right". Getting hostile or overly defensive won't help anything. Explanation will. Several people who did not become emotionaly involved in this thread, took the time to point out the favorable track conditions. I, myself, did not take that fact into consideration. And now I have. Your car, on that particular track, on that particular day, had a good trap speed given the mod's you claim. My car is considerably quicker, not a brag, just a fact. So it's not like you beat me in a race and me calling you a cheater.There are an uncountable number of cars on this forum, that would chew me up and spit me out and not even break a sweat. There is always someone quicker. And trust me. I will not be the only person who will ever question something that you have done.
01-12-2012, 09:10 PM
#85
TECH Fanatic
That's great, Danny. You preached all that crap about RWHP, and how accurate and over our heads your little internet RWHP=ET calculator was, yet now you admit you didn't even take DA or other conditions into account.....but you have lots of track experience. Ok man. I've only been doing this for a decade, so never mind me.
Not sure if you're referring to my car or OPs car, but mine is a consistent 12.5-12.6 car at -500 to +300' DA, and 12.7 car above that (hopefully 2 tenths quicker after last weekends header install). Look man, I'm usually the first one to call BS on someone, not just here but on other forums as well. But the crap that you spewed to justify your skepticism was honestly making several of us suspect you of trolling.
Not sure if you're referring to my car or OPs car, but mine is a consistent 12.5-12.6 car at -500 to +300' DA, and 12.7 car above that (hopefully 2 tenths quicker after last weekends header install). Look man, I'm usually the first one to call BS on someone, not just here but on other forums as well. But the crap that you spewed to justify your skepticism was honestly making several of us suspect you of trolling.
01-12-2012, 09:11 PM
#86
TECH Fanatic
