Is a 6.44 @ 99.51 fast ?
11-30-2004, 12:48 PM
#21
Originally Posted by Slostang
Do you stil have the fastest stock shortblock in the country?
HPE is claiming to have gone .001 quicker than me but supplying no information.
If I put on heads and a bigger shot, I don't see 9.20's being a problem.
12-01-2004, 03:03 PM
#23
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 01-Z
At this point ,who cares.
HPE is claiming to have gone .001 quicker than me but supplying no information.
If I put on heads and a bigger shot, I don't see 9.20's being a problem.
HPE is claiming to have gone .001 quicker than me but supplying no information.
If I put on heads and a bigger shot, I don't see 9.20's being a problem.
12-06-2004, 08:40 PM
#34
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what track was this done at? Sounds like it was at a 600' track. There's plenty of them in the South.
__________________
1966 Chevy II twin turbo LS3 project
2016 Z07 Carbon
1966 Chevy II twin turbo LS3 project
2016 Z07 Carbon
12-06-2004, 09:04 PM
#36
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought the slip looked familiar, but I didn't want to come right out and say it. So add about 3-4 tenths and around 5mph for "realistic" numbers. And the wind never blows 25mph in Mobile... 
__________________
1966 Chevy II twin turbo LS3 project
2016 Z07 Carbon
1966 Chevy II twin turbo LS3 project
2016 Z07 Carbon
12-06-2004, 09:24 PM
#37
7 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gainesville, Florida # of drag strips runs: ?!?!?
Posts: 8,834
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
yep, in agreement. The 1.657 (looks like to me) and 4.46 330 foot times can't add up to a 6.44 at only 99 mph.
Still respectable, but not a 10 flat car.
Derek
Still respectable, but not a 10 flat car.
Derek
12-07-2004, 11:02 AM
#39
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you go to http://www.mobiledragway.com/results04_index.htm and look at some of the times that the local cars are running... all of them are "out of whack" with what normal track times seem to be. Thus, I agree, it's a 'track thing'. We don't have a 600' column in the database. 
12-07-2004, 01:13 PM
#40
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Camaroholic
If you go to http://www.mobiledragway.com/results04_index.htm and look at some of the times that the local cars are running... all of them are "out of whack" with what normal track times seem to be. Thus, I agree, it's a 'track thing'. We don't have a 600' column in the database.
__________________
1966 Chevy II twin turbo LS3 project
2016 Z07 Carbon
1966 Chevy II twin turbo LS3 project
2016 Z07 Carbon