**new best 10.771@ 127.56
#21
![Thumbs down](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon13.gif)
Originally Posted by mrb00formula
Marc- stop being a surrogate-****-talker.. wallowing shamelessly and in vicarious bliss in Pete's glory
![Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/rolleyes.gif)
Couldn't legitimately discredit Pete or Cartek this time so you just found a different way to totally fvck up yet another thread huh?
#22
8 second mod
iTrader: (37)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: East Side Performance! mASShole
Posts: 17,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So the 200lbs that came off the car since the last time is what is differant, that is what droped the time?
So it is about 1 - 10th per 100lbs?
10.7 is rippin in a HC car. I will give you that. Just a bit funny that it was said in a previos thred the car was 3,400 + lbs, and full race weight- seats. Now it is 3,200? Is that with driver?
So it is about 1 - 10th per 100lbs?
10.7 is rippin in a HC car. I will give you that. Just a bit funny that it was said in a previos thred the car was 3,400 + lbs, and full race weight- seats. Now it is 3,200? Is that with driver?
#24
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Cheers!!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cheers.gif)
Regardless of race weight that ET is @#$%^ awesome!!!!
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
Everybody knows the lighter a car is the faster it will go especially when it's all motor. Congrats AGAIN Pete I'm beginning to wonder if the auto/matic's (myself) are going to be able to hang w/ the 6 shooters at all next year???????????
![Cheers!!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cheers.gif)
![Cheers!!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cheers.gif)
![Cheers!!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cheers.gif)
#25
![Lightbulb](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon3.gif)
Originally Posted by Noyzee
So the 200lbs that came off the car since the last time is what is differant, that is what droped the time?
So it is about 1 - 10th per 100lbs?
10.7 is rippin in a HC car. I will give you that. Just a bit funny that it was said in a previos thred the car was 3,400 + lbs, and full race weight- seats. Now it is 3,200?
So it is about 1 - 10th per 100lbs?
10.7 is rippin in a HC car. I will give you that. Just a bit funny that it was said in a previos thred the car was 3,400 + lbs, and full race weight- seats. Now it is 3,200?
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
And it's NOT 3200 pounds even either...the car is actually slightly heavier right now than it was down at MIR due to the weight of the added mufflers...roughly 3240 with driver. Roughly 3275 (passenger seat in) when it ran the 10.94 at Westhampton.
So why did the car go so much quicker/faster you ask?
Other cars have NEVER gone any quicker over time with no changes? Drivers can't learn to drive their own cars any better? Air quality/track condition changes (even if only slight) have NO effect on car performance?
C'mon man, you've gotta be smarter than that.
The car HAS trapped nearly 100mph in the 1/8 and 127.5+ in the 1/4...yes you're right, that IS rippin' in a stock bottom end H/C car.
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
![Mr. Cool](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cool.gif)