12.72@122mph LOL
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: Lake in the Hills, IL
Originally Posted by BIGBOS
Was this N/A
Na times were 13.1@114... Traction was real bad there many other guys said they were running a half to full second slower than usual
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
10 Second Club
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 4
From: H-town
Originally Posted by ZL1camaro
i dont think ur car pulled that hard on the top end to achieve the trap speed u did, and especially because of ur so called traction problem.
Ur numbers just dont match up!
Ur numbers just dont match up!
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: Lake in the Hills, IL
Ok everyone who doesnt believe here Im gonna post my time slip with a pic of my car with the numbers still on it I hope this suffices u...This is one of them im trying to find the one that was 122.xx
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,339
Likes: 3
From: NYC metro area
I definitely believe it's possible.. saw the vid and it seems like it was poor track prepping that caused it. 2.16 isn't a horrible 60'... not good either but we're not talkin about 2.4s or anything.
Like I said in the midwest section.
My car several years ago when it was cam, headers, drag radials and a stock clutch with a big TNT wet shot on it went 12.0@126 on 2.1 sixties..did it every time..car would not hook until the top of 3rd gear. never could get the bastard in the 11's..just couldn't get it to hook on the nittos with that big spray kit on it. 12.0 every time.
his times are consistent.
My car several years ago when it was cam, headers, drag radials and a stock clutch with a big TNT wet shot on it went 12.0@126 on 2.1 sixties..did it every time..car would not hook until the top of 3rd gear. never could get the bastard in the 11's..just couldn't get it to hook on the nittos with that big spray kit on it. 12.0 every time.
his times are consistent.