Fast 102 trap speeds

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 4, 2013 | 11:54 AM

#21

wilkes02SS

Staging Lane

Joined: Jun 2013

Posts: 78

Likes: 0

From: Ft.Polk LA

need to go to a 102mmTB as well. I didn't think the 90mm i had would choke it that bad, but looking at the graph, yea it was real bad above 4.5k. just be ready to make that switch too.

Dec 4, 2013 | 11:58 AM

#22

jlrz28

10 Second Fun Car

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 2,045

Likes: 1

From: Pearland, Tx

I dynod with both the 90 and 102 tb. Saw 5 hp difference decided against it due to more tuning needed. I did however use the 102tb on the current motor.

Dec 4, 2013 | 12:05 PM

#23

wilkes02SS

Staging Lane

Joined: Jun 2013

Posts: 78

Likes: 0

From: Ft.Polk LA

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlrz28

I dynod with both the 90 and 102 tb. Saw 5 hp difference decided against it due to more tuning needed. I did however use the 102tb on the current motor.

That's unusual. My 434(ls6) hates that 90mm Tb above 4.5k you can see it starving on the charts

Dec 4, 2013 | 12:07 PM

#24

jlrz28

10 Second Fun Car

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 2,045

Likes: 1

From: Pearland, Tx

The loss was seen with the 346. With 402 I went ahead and ran the 102 due to the increased ci

Dec 4, 2013 | 12:17 PM

#25

wilkes02SS

Staging Lane

Joined: Jun 2013

Posts: 78

Likes: 0

From: Ft.Polk LA

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlrz28

The loss was seen with the 346. With 402 I went ahead and ran the 102 due to the increased ci

ok that makes a bit more sense i suppose. was it a NA 346? i think depending on the setup is wether it responds well to it. some do, and some don't.

Dec 4, 2013 | 12:23 PM

#26

jlrz28

10 Second Fun Car

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 2,045

Likes: 1

From: Pearland, Tx

Yes it was a 346 NA. This was done at Patrick Gs dyno.

Dec 11, 2013 | 04:35 PM

#27

Kingc8r

11 Second Club

iTrader: (21)

Joined: Jan 2008

Posts: 4,565

Likes: 59

From: SF Bay Area

Quote:

Originally Posted by Transam1

Ill go first i guess even though i wont have my 102 track passes till Sunday!

1. Full weight car
2. 347ci, 5200 converter, afr225's @59cc, 236/242 .615/.615 111LSA, 9" w. 4.11
3. Best trap was 91.5 MPH and 1.59 60' with the LS6 intake and stock TB in the 1/8 mile

Stay tuned.... 102 intake and 92mm TB are on and waiting. Going to retune at the track also, i doubt we make a pass with the old tune, but i guess i can for *****.

That's a pretty weak trap considering the mods. I trapped 91.1 with a F13, stock 853s and a ls6 intake with a 1.7 60ft.

I wonder why it's trapping that low? Have you had your trans built?

Dec 11, 2013 | 04:41 PM

#28

John Deere racer

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 641

Likes: 0

From: Williamsport,in

346
Afr 225
Fast 102
102 tb
G6x3
470rwhp N/A
Thru mwc 9 and 4.56 gear

Ran
1.39 60ft
10.4
128mph
M6...of course

I think 1/8 mile was
101mph

I'm
Going to use a 102 on my new 370 ci set up
Hopeing to go 135mph with it ...N/A
M6 ... Of course

Last edited by John Deere racer; Dec 11, 2013 at 04:49 PM.