Cam specs---->Whatcha think?
I know the cam isnt a bad design but if I find out I have no advance ground into it I will take COMPS suggestion and adv it 4 degree to a 109ICL...
Terry your brow-nosing again.Dont worry the converter is yours.I will have it out Wed and in the mail Thurs afternoon.I will email u the info in a day or so.
Chris/Terry u are correct,I'll run the car after the verter/headers are installed,then check the chain and cam timing in a month just to make sure its either the 224 or the 224-228 and degree it in according to COMP.......
Me run MMS parts??
Dont get me wrong Terry I like Mike but I'll continue to run CARTEKS setup with alittle re-tweek on the verter,headers and cam timing
JS
<small>[ September 22, 2002, 04:14 PM: Message edited by: JS ]</small>
<strong> G2 cam was a joke.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Tell me, what makes you so credible in this cam world?
<small>[ September 22, 2002, 06:35 PM: Message edited by: G2 LS1 ]</small>
Terry your brow-nosing again.Dont worry the converter is yours.I will have it out Wed and in the mail Thurs afternoon.I will email u the info in a day or so.
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I can't wait to try it. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">
Me run MMS parts??
Dont get me wrong Terry I like Mike but I'll continue to run CARTEKS setup with alittle re-tweek on the verter,headers and cam timing
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Ah. It sounded like you were ready to grind your own cam or something so I was trying to point you in the right direction. I think my old cam would work well with your setup. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Mike Hoffpauir:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Trevor D:
<strong>I'm thinking of upgrading to the www.jperacing.com "FU-2" cam. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> It's a 228/228 XE-R on a 111.5 LSATrevor</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Trevor, I thought you were going to try the g2 cam?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">This "new super cam" bandwagon is ridiculous, first it starts with the B1/T1 grinds years ago, then the short-lived hammer cam, G2 cam was a joke, TR230 and its copy-cats F1 and X1, the list goes on and on...</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That's part of promoting a shop. If you don't like it, then don't do it...simple enough. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> People/shops keep trying different things, no matter how small the changes are. That's just part of fine-tuning and experimentation. A person has every right to promote the shop that they use. Believe it or not, people do get some great customer service from various shops, and they're happy to help that shop out by letting everyone know their great experience with them. You could always get your Dremel out and come up with your own; that way you won't have to jump on any "bandwagon". Our current G2 cam is a 224/224 on a 113 LSA. I'm running the cam on a 112 LSA, and it seems to work well for me.
Trevor








