Results from new headers.....
01-28-2003 | 03:01 PM
#22
TECH Junkie
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
From: At the office
Re: Results from new headers..... Maybe I'm wrong on this one, but isn't 94mph in the 1/8 mile with a 422 engine kind of weak, even with FLP's?
I run that in my 346 and trap around 117mph.
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />
I run that in my 346 and trap around 117mph.
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />
01-28-2003 | 05:04 PM
#23
Thread Starter
Back in the staging lane
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
From: NE Texas
Re: Results from new headers..... yes it is weak. But tell me what size tire you're running, and what size stall, and what gears, etc. With a 28" tire, 3300 stall, and 4.10 gears, I'm not gonna be trapping 100mph.
A 35lb driveshaft, and a full weight (other than passenger seat) car
There's a lot more factors than how many cu inches you read on a post.
<small>[ January 28, 2003, 04:07 PM: Message edited by: Beeler311 ]</small>
A 35lb driveshaft, and a full weight (other than passenger seat) car
There's a lot more factors than how many cu inches you read on a post.
<small>[ January 28, 2003, 04:07 PM: Message edited by: Beeler311 ]</small>
01-28-2003 | 05:22 PM
#24
TECH Junkie
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
From: At the office
Re: Results from new headers..... </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Beeler311:
<strong> yes it is weak. But tell me what size tire you're running, and what size stall, and what gears, etc. With a 28" tire, 3300 stall, and 4.10 gears, I'm not gonna be trapping 100mph.
A 35lb driveshaft, and a full weight (other than passenger seat) car
There's a lot more factors than how many cu inches you read on a post. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You are right.
I'm running a 26" tire, a crappy aluminum flywheel, no stall, 3.73 gears, in a car that now weighs about 3700lbs with me in it at 1500ft elevation.
Gearing shouldn't negatively affect your traps if you are geared properly.
If I stepped up to 4.30 gears in my car I'd pick up .2/2mph since I'm way out of the powerband when crossing the traps with 3.73's.
I just found it odd, that even with all those variables, you'd only trap 94mph, thats all. You didn't post all your mods, so thats why I was guessing. Where in texas are you? Elevation?
<strong> yes it is weak. But tell me what size tire you're running, and what size stall, and what gears, etc. With a 28" tire, 3300 stall, and 4.10 gears, I'm not gonna be trapping 100mph.
A 35lb driveshaft, and a full weight (other than passenger seat) car
There's a lot more factors than how many cu inches you read on a post. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You are right.
I'm running a 26" tire, a crappy aluminum flywheel, no stall, 3.73 gears, in a car that now weighs about 3700lbs with me in it at 1500ft elevation.
Gearing shouldn't negatively affect your traps if you are geared properly.
If I stepped up to 4.30 gears in my car I'd pick up .2/2mph since I'm way out of the powerband when crossing the traps with 3.73's.
I just found it odd, that even with all those variables, you'd only trap 94mph, thats all. You didn't post all your mods, so thats why I was guessing. Where in texas are you? Elevation?
01-28-2003 | 05:23 PM
#25
Re: Results from new headers..... I changed the edit feature back to showing when someone has edited their post. It defaulted to a different setting when we updated to UBB 6.5 I mean 6.4....
<small>[ January 28, 2003, 04:24 PM: Message edited by: Pro Stock John ]</small>
<small>[ January 28, 2003, 04:24 PM: Message edited by: Pro Stock John ]</small>