Got a new best ET!
Re: Got a new best ET! That or the DA was -10,000. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Re: Got a new best ET! TRACK AND SLIP?? hello??
sorry but this is BS because you either got a car that had stage 2 heads/cam or your car weighs 2700 pounds maybe
most heads/cam M6's trap 121-126
Jason 99 TA, the fastest NA heads/cam car in the nation traps 128, but he makes around 450HP. So your tellin us your making over 400hp stock with bolt ons? Its no way....
the fastest NA M6 mph stock ive seen is what? 118-120 maybe. But thats a 2900-3100 pound car gutted almost.
if you ran it, than prove it like rageman said
sorry but this is BS because you either got a car that had stage 2 heads/cam or your car weighs 2700 pounds maybe
most heads/cam M6's trap 121-126
Jason 99 TA, the fastest NA heads/cam car in the nation traps 128, but he makes around 450HP. So your tellin us your making over 400hp stock with bolt ons? Its no way....
the fastest NA M6 mph stock ive seen is what? 118-120 maybe. But thats a 2900-3100 pound car gutted almost.
if you ran it, than prove it like rageman said
Re: Got a new best ET! </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Black01LS1:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">126.39mph! I do that on a 200 shot with a cam!</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm sorry you wasted your money. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="gr_sad.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Judging from the pic it looks like I wasted my money. If you really have what you say congrats, and you will have no problem running me at the North vs South shoot out for a nice sum of money. Oh and by the way you can scan those timeslips at any kinko's. Do you have video proof or a credable witness?
http://www.streetcarchaos.net/Chaos3...c3part1186.jpg
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">126.39mph! I do that on a 200 shot with a cam!</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm sorry you wasted your money. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="gr_sad.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Judging from the pic it looks like I wasted my money. If you really have what you say congrats, and you will have no problem running me at the North vs South shoot out for a nice sum of money. Oh and by the way you can scan those timeslips at any kinko's. Do you have video proof or a credable witness?
http://www.streetcarchaos.net/Chaos3...c3part1186.jpg
11 Second Club
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
From: Hanover MD
Re: Got a new best ET! <img border="0" alt="[bullshit]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_bs.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />
maybe with -10000 da, and 2700 raceweight!
maybe with -10000 da, and 2700 raceweight!
Re: Got a new best ET! </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by EVIL:
<strong>maybe with -10000 da, and 2700 raceweight! </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Man, I had to stop and think about that for a while. That would be sweeeeeeeeeeeeeet to run in!!!
<strong>maybe with -10000 da, and 2700 raceweight! </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Man, I had to stop and think about that for a while. That would be sweeeeeeeeeeeeeet to run in!!!
Re: Got a new best ET! The only way you could trap that mph is if you were hit from behind by a 7 second chevelle.
OR
The track you were racing at had a 45% downhill grade.
For an internally stock motor to be trapping that mph with those tires is unrealistic unless you were hitting the car with a big shot of crack.
Prove it. Then we'll believe.
<small>[ February 19, 2003, 07:08 PM: Message edited by: TooSlowFiveOh ]</small>
OR
The track you were racing at had a 45% downhill grade.
For an internally stock motor to be trapping that mph with those tires is unrealistic unless you were hitting the car with a big shot of crack.
Prove it. Then we'll believe.
<small>[ February 19, 2003, 07:08 PM: Message edited by: TooSlowFiveOh ]</small>
Re: Got a new best ET! Wow!!! A quick calculation tells me with a 4.56 gear and 28's you were spinning your stock internal motor to ~6900 rpm's. Now that's impressive! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
Jeffrey
Jeffrey
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo Re: Got a new best ET! Actually I think the 28 ET drags measure 27.3 right? If that's the case you could have been 7000+. Can you say factory freak! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
Jeffrey
Jeffrey
Re: Got a new best ET! Yeah. If they're 9" wide like mine (since he copied nearly every other mod I had, might as well copy that one), they're 27.3" tall with no growth.
<small>[ February 19, 2003, 07:41 PM: Message edited by: RAGEman ]</small>
<small>[ February 19, 2003, 07:41 PM: Message edited by: RAGEman ]</small>
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: In the garage fixing LT1
Re: Got a new best ET! Are you sure a piece of the space shuttle didn't fly through the trap and throw things off? That is a fantastic set of numbers. I think you have more work ahead if anyone's going to believe you though.
Re: Got a new best ET! I think 27.3 is @full growth.
Mine measure about 26.5 at rest.(about)
Not that it matters,this thread is for entertainment,
not fact.
We all know it's just not possible to trap
that high on a stock motor@3340 raceweight.
Mine measure about 26.5 at rest.(about)
Not that it matters,this thread is for entertainment,
not fact.
We all know it's just not possible to trap
that high on a stock motor@3340 raceweight.
Re: Got a new best ET! </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 01-Z:
<strong> I think 27.3 is @full growth.
Mine measure about 26.5 at rest.(about)
Not that it matters,this thread is for entertainment,
not fact.
We all know it's just not possible to trap
that high on a stock motor@3340 raceweight. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well, I haven't measured mine, but that would be kinda gay for a tire that's advertised to be 28" tall to actually be 26.5". Not doubting you at all, but the gear calculator I always use (F-body.org) is right on with what I cross the traps at 27.8" (accounting for .5" tire growth from 27.3" hot at rest). Either way, this guy's claims are outlandish. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> I have reasons to believe it could possibly be a Waco character messing with me. It's all a conspiracy, everyone's after my "magic" trap speed. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> All it takes is high-gearing (3.42), great air, and low raceweight. I can see 126 MPH with a raceweight of around 2500-2600 lbs. in great air. Sean, since I talked to you earlier today, what are you leaning towards? Cam/N2O/or N/A stock internals? I'd really love for you and I both to be competing (against the evil Bob Cosby) at the BG shootout!!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
<strong> I think 27.3 is @full growth.
Mine measure about 26.5 at rest.(about)
Not that it matters,this thread is for entertainment,
not fact.
We all know it's just not possible to trap
that high on a stock motor@3340 raceweight. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well, I haven't measured mine, but that would be kinda gay for a tire that's advertised to be 28" tall to actually be 26.5". Not doubting you at all, but the gear calculator I always use (F-body.org) is right on with what I cross the traps at 27.8" (accounting for .5" tire growth from 27.3" hot at rest). Either way, this guy's claims are outlandish. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> I have reasons to believe it could possibly be a Waco character messing with me. It's all a conspiracy, everyone's after my "magic" trap speed. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> All it takes is high-gearing (3.42), great air, and low raceweight. I can see 126 MPH with a raceweight of around 2500-2600 lbs. in great air. Sean, since I talked to you earlier today, what are you leaning towards? Cam/N2O/or N/A stock internals? I'd really love for you and I both to be competing (against the evil Bob Cosby) at the BG shootout!!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
!Dial-up Director
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,100
Likes: 1
From: Louisiana
Re: Got a new best ET! Looks like a timing error, could you post the entire slip? Still 11.5s @ 123mph is stout for stock internals. Any of the locals on the borad see you run? <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
Justin
Justin
TECH Addict
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,950
Likes: 0
From: Magee MS
Re: Got a new best ET! </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 98TAauto:
<strong> TRACK AND SLIP?? hello??
sorry but this is BS because you either got a car that had stage 2 heads/cam or your car weighs 2700 pounds maybe
most heads/cam M6's trap 121-126
Jason 99 TA, the fastest NA heads/cam car in the nation traps 128, but he makes around 450HP. So your tellin us your making over 400hp stock with bolt ons? Its no way....
the fastest NA M6 mph stock ive seen is what? 118-120 maybe. But thats a 2900-3100 pound car gutted almost.
if you ran it, than prove it like rageman said </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You maybe correct about Jason running 128 and being the FASTEST but not the quickest(at the time when the car was a h/c setup)..... Nor is his car just a head/cam car(anymore).
I am not gunna call the guy a lier. Even though the times sound a little off specially being in TEXAS!!!!!!(from my experience at SLP CAD the TEXAS WEATHER SUCKS!!!!!!!)<-- for example a freind of mine has a RELITIVELY STOCK 2002 SS with only the cats gutted and all free mods that ran a 12.7 @ 109 and then a couple 12.90's @ 110 the SAME DAY which this was in GREAT weather, and he raced at the SLP CAD and the car went a best of a 13.6 @ 108! I say thumbs ALL the way down to the TEXAS WEATHER!
Josh S.
<strong> TRACK AND SLIP?? hello??
sorry but this is BS because you either got a car that had stage 2 heads/cam or your car weighs 2700 pounds maybe
most heads/cam M6's trap 121-126
Jason 99 TA, the fastest NA heads/cam car in the nation traps 128, but he makes around 450HP. So your tellin us your making over 400hp stock with bolt ons? Its no way....
the fastest NA M6 mph stock ive seen is what? 118-120 maybe. But thats a 2900-3100 pound car gutted almost.
if you ran it, than prove it like rageman said </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You maybe correct about Jason running 128 and being the FASTEST but not the quickest(at the time when the car was a h/c setup)..... Nor is his car just a head/cam car(anymore).
I am not gunna call the guy a lier. Even though the times sound a little off specially being in TEXAS!!!!!!(from my experience at SLP CAD the TEXAS WEATHER SUCKS!!!!!!!)<-- for example a freind of mine has a RELITIVELY STOCK 2002 SS with only the cats gutted and all free mods that ran a 12.7 @ 109 and then a couple 12.90's @ 110 the SAME DAY which this was in GREAT weather, and he raced at the SLP CAD and the car went a best of a 13.6 @ 108! I say thumbs ALL the way down to the TEXAS WEATHER!
Josh S.
Re: Got a new best ET! </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by The Guy in MY 99TA:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 98TAauto:
<strong> TRACK AND SLIP?? hello??
sorry but this is BS because you either got a car that had stage 2 heads/cam or your car weighs 2700 pounds maybe
most heads/cam M6's trap 121-126
Jason 99 TA, the fastest NA heads/cam car in the nation traps 128, but he makes around 450HP. So your tellin us your making over 400hp stock with bolt ons? Its no way....
the fastest NA M6 mph stock ive seen is what? 118-120 maybe. But thats a 2900-3100 pound car gutted almost.
if you ran it, than prove it like rageman said </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You maybe correct about Jason running 128 and being the FASTEST but not the quickest(at the time when the car was a h/c setup)..... Nor is his car just a head/cam car(anymore).
I am not gunna call the guy a lier. Even though the times sound a little off specially being in TEXAS!!!!!!(from my experience at SLP CAD the TEXAS WEATHER SUCKS!!!!!!!)<-- for example a freind of mine has a RELITIVELY STOCK 2002 SS with only the cats gutted and all free mods that ran a 12.7 @ 109 and then a couple 12.90's @ 110 the SAME DAY which this was in GREAT weather, and he raced at the SLP CAD and the car went a best of a 13.6 @ 108! I say thumbs ALL the way down to the TEXAS WEATHER!
Josh S. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Josh, im lost here. But I thought jason is the quickest and fastest NA 346 car right now? Raughammer had the old record at 10.66 didnt he? And Jason passed that. Im just curious thats all??
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 98TAauto:
<strong> TRACK AND SLIP?? hello??
sorry but this is BS because you either got a car that had stage 2 heads/cam or your car weighs 2700 pounds maybe
most heads/cam M6's trap 121-126
Jason 99 TA, the fastest NA heads/cam car in the nation traps 128, but he makes around 450HP. So your tellin us your making over 400hp stock with bolt ons? Its no way....
the fastest NA M6 mph stock ive seen is what? 118-120 maybe. But thats a 2900-3100 pound car gutted almost.
if you ran it, than prove it like rageman said </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You maybe correct about Jason running 128 and being the FASTEST but not the quickest(at the time when the car was a h/c setup)..... Nor is his car just a head/cam car(anymore).
I am not gunna call the guy a lier. Even though the times sound a little off specially being in TEXAS!!!!!!(from my experience at SLP CAD the TEXAS WEATHER SUCKS!!!!!!!)<-- for example a freind of mine has a RELITIVELY STOCK 2002 SS with only the cats gutted and all free mods that ran a 12.7 @ 109 and then a couple 12.90's @ 110 the SAME DAY which this was in GREAT weather, and he raced at the SLP CAD and the car went a best of a 13.6 @ 108! I say thumbs ALL the way down to the TEXAS WEATHER!
Josh S. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Josh, im lost here. But I thought jason is the quickest and fastest NA 346 car right now? Raughammer had the old record at 10.66 didnt he? And Jason passed that. Im just curious thats all??
Re: Got a new best ET! </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by The Guy in MY 99TA:
<strong>You maybe correct about Jason running 128 and being the FASTEST but not the quickest(at the time when the car was a h/c setup)..... Nor is his car just a head/cam car(anymore).
I am not gunna call the guy a lier. Even though the times sound a little off specially being in TEXAS!!!!!!(from my experience at SLP CAD the TEXAS WEATHER SUCKS!!!!!!!)<-- for example a freind of mine has a RELITIVELY STOCK 2002 SS with only the cats gutted and all free mods that ran a 12.7 @ 109 and then a couple 12.90's @ 110 the SAME DAY which this was in GREAT weather, and he raced at the SLP CAD and the car went a best of a 13.6 @ 108! I say thumbs ALL the way down to the TEXAS WEATHER!
Josh S. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm still not completely convinced that Jason's forged bottom end gives him any power gains. It definitely gives him stability and strength to turn high RPM's and spray a healthy shot of N2O on top of it. But, I don't know about gaining him any power. The solid roller is what's giving him that ungodly power. Now, you're right in that his car is not JUST a heads/cam car, so don't get me wrong, I'm not disagreeing. But I'm not sure if it gains him any power.
You're killing me! You can't judge Texas weather in general by how it is one day! Texas weather ROCKS (in the winter)!!
<strong>You maybe correct about Jason running 128 and being the FASTEST but not the quickest(at the time when the car was a h/c setup)..... Nor is his car just a head/cam car(anymore).
I am not gunna call the guy a lier. Even though the times sound a little off specially being in TEXAS!!!!!!(from my experience at SLP CAD the TEXAS WEATHER SUCKS!!!!!!!)<-- for example a freind of mine has a RELITIVELY STOCK 2002 SS with only the cats gutted and all free mods that ran a 12.7 @ 109 and then a couple 12.90's @ 110 the SAME DAY which this was in GREAT weather, and he raced at the SLP CAD and the car went a best of a 13.6 @ 108! I say thumbs ALL the way down to the TEXAS WEATHER!
Josh S. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm still not completely convinced that Jason's forged bottom end gives him any power gains. It definitely gives him stability and strength to turn high RPM's and spray a healthy shot of N2O on top of it. But, I don't know about gaining him any power. The solid roller is what's giving him that ungodly power. Now, you're right in that his car is not JUST a heads/cam car, so don't get me wrong, I'm not disagreeing. But I'm not sure if it gains him any power.
You're killing me! You can't judge Texas weather in general by how it is one day! Texas weather ROCKS (in the winter)!!
Re: Got a new best ET! </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 98TAauto:
<strong>Josh, im lost here. But I thought jason is the quickest and fastest NA 346 car right now? Raughammer had the old record at 10.66 didnt he? And Jason passed that. Im just curious thats all?? </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yes, Jason is the quickest and fastest N/A 346. <img border="0" alt="[worship]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[driving]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_driving3.gif" />
<strong>Josh, im lost here. But I thought jason is the quickest and fastest NA 346 car right now? Raughammer had the old record at 10.66 didnt he? And Jason passed that. Im just curious thats all?? </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yes, Jason is the quickest and fastest N/A 346. <img border="0" alt="[worship]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[driving]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_driving3.gif" />