For Those of You Interested in the Progress of the 2003 COBRAs
http://modularfords.com/forums/showt...5&pagenumber=1
<strong> Is that really impressive for race gas and two power adders? </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I would take 790 rwHP regardless of how I got it, but I will have to be content with my miniscule 373 rwHP COBRA. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
Most COBRAs exceeding 16 pounds of boost use race gas or fuel concentrate, regardless of the type of blower they run. I guess they could use 93 octane, but the A/F ratio and timing advance would have to very mild, to say the least.
What's impressive about Pete's car is that it made 730 rwHP with just the blower. Plus, the shot of N2O isn't that high (only a 50 shot), and he's probably using it to further cool the intake charge temperature.
<small>[ March 05, 2003, 05:34 PM: Message edited by: Jahel'98COBRA ]</small>
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Do any of these big dyno racers have any track times? Thats more important to me <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Tony
-Tony
I agree with what has been said about the Supras. They run enormous displacement turbos, making for better numbers with a smaller displacement engine. Yet, they don't run "that fast" at the drag strip. This Mustang should haul ***, assuming the stock IRS doesn't grenade.
Supposedly, a company by the name of Works is coming out with even a bigger blower that walk all over the Kenne Bell. They already manufacture this larger displacement blower for the Lightning.
In addition, a supercharged car won't put up similar peak dyno numbers compared to a single or twin turbo, due to the parasitic loss needed to turn the blower. A simple Vortech S-trim for our cars uses 70 HP just to spin the blower gears.
For a simple blower swap ($3600), bolt-ons ($1000), larger injectors, and a dyno tune, these new COBRAs in 2003 are to the Ford camp what the LS-1 was to the GM crowd back in 1998.
<strong> **** Dynojet Numbers <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> . Track times mean everything. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Amen brotha!!
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Fenris Ulf:
<strong> Is that really impressive for race gas and two power adders? </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I would take 790 rwHP regardless of how I got it, but I will have to be content with my miniscule 373 rwHP COBRA. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">My point was an all motor car meant to run on 93 octane will pull the same numbers all day, not have to use the "well I don't have race gas or a full bottle now, but otherwise it could run 9s!" excuse.
Yes its impressive and I very much welcome the cobra as both healthy competition and another reason to buy an american muscle-car.


