V6 Camaro Springs?
Ive been hearing some good stuff about running V6 springs in the back because there much more stiff than the stock Z28 springs. If anyone has any input good or bad throw it out.
Tony
Last edited by sbcgenII; Oct 10, 2005 at 03:54 PM.

You've got it half right. They are softer, but we put 'em on the back. A stiff spring on the back will not accept weight transfer, you throw the weight back there on launch and a stiff spring throws it right back up front. A softer (V6) spring will accept the weight transfer.
I did this mod on my '94. Great bang for the buck. Did it at the same time as I did QA'1s up front and started pulling the front wheels on launch for the first time ever.
Trending Topics
I know from watching video and the feel of my car that with the stock springs it would throw the car immediately back forward and that with the V6 springs it accepts it and the 60' is better.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
my car already squats like a MOTHERFUKER on the rr side, i think it may bottum out so what i was thinking about doing is putting a v6 spring on the left side to get even weight transfer in the back.
the only problem with this is it is trying to fix a problem ***-backwards. putting less pressure on the lr tire that already has less weight onto it doesn't make much sense even if the car squated straighter it would still have less pressure/weight on the tire that needs it.. after thinking about this for a minute i decided to sometime (next season) get an airbag for the lr side.
from my thoughts on it i don't think v6 springs are the answer- and i agree with the one post above that the front suspension is the main suspension to be focused on first. get the car to squat straight (airbag/s) and get the front to come up more (shocks, swaybar!, battery relocation, pin-on hood, bumper support!, a/c! etc...) and you will come out harder. if you have a little leeway and can still hook with less squat adjust the airbags accordingly/adjust the shocks accordingly if you want to spend the cash for adjustable shocks.
http://www.angelfire.com/my/fastcar/suspension.html
What I will say is that I have a hell of a lot more suspension mods on my '94 than '95 V6 rear springs and QA-1 12-ways up front. In other words, I've been racing my '94 since '96 and have tried/done everything in your laundry list and that the V6 springs are just one factor in my entire suspension equation. My car hooks straight (I'm not sure what "squats straight" really means) and gets great weight transfer, putting the weight on the back tires where it's needed. If it were to squat too much, I'd trim my bumpstops and/or add an airbag.
idk what anybody does i was just giving my opinion.
TWS- how does your post relate to this question that was posted and i was trying to help with? he said "cheap" suspension mods- he/i didn't ask how much suspension work you did to your "94" since "96" etc...you go on to reccomend v6 springs, then in the next post say how you have tons of suspension mods done to the car and v6 springs are just another part of the equasion. im not sure i understand YOU bro...
cheap= !swaybar, !front bumper support, airbag(s), battery relocation> v6 springs
Last edited by sleeperstyle; Oct 11, 2005 at 06:39 PM.


