corrected timeslips VS corrected dyno #'s
example, you got people racing at good tracks like atco or ciecil then theres people that get screwed by running in nevada somewhere at there local track and their alot slower. if they corrected the times automatically it would be alot better comparison.
Plus a dyno is used more as a 'standard' for measuring power so there needs to be some way of leveling the playing field. Lot of variables in a drag car then just elevation/temp but I agree it would be nice for track timing systems to have a decent weather station and print both actual and sea level times.
The dyno is for tuning, so you want to know what the car would be making in good air versus the air what you are running in.
Correcting track e.t.'s is like saying "well if I didn't have a full tank of gas" or "If I had skinny front wheels instead of my factory rims." I believe that what you run at the track should be the actual numbers you state, not corrected for DA. Besides the fact that some cars will pick-up more or less than others from certain DA. And I can see the heard of people bragging about "My et was...." when it's the corrected for DA one versus their actual e.t.
We go from -500 DA in the winter to 3500 or more in the summer here at Gainesville, and I know I look forward to winter-time runs. But I never think of the summer-time runs as "corrected that would be...."
Just my $.02
Derek






