Drag Racing Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How good are the non-R QA1 shocks for drag racing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2007 | 12:08 AM
  #1  
Gary Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley, California
Default How good are the non-R QA1 shocks for drag racing?

I think I screwed up. I ordered QA1 single-adjustable front shocks (OED7855P) assuming the adjustment changed the ratio of compression to rebound. Now, looking at the force/velocity diagram, it appears that compression and rebound are always equal and the adjustment simply changes the shock from weak to stiff. I am wondering if I should have ordered the RC7855P because I wanted to start with the classic 90/10 rebound/compression ratio. How bad are the R-types on the street?

Last edited by Gary Z; 04-11-2007 at 12:16 AM.
Old 04-11-2007 | 06:26 AM
  #2  
Navy David SS's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,647
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

I've used my single adjustable QA1 for 4-5 years. So far so good. Best 60' todate is 1.30. Should see 1.2's this summer.

David
Old 04-11-2007 | 11:12 AM
  #3  
Noyzee's Avatar
8 second mod
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 17,879
Likes: 1
From: East Side Performance! mASShole
Default

i also have the same shocks. 1.30 so far is my best as well
Old 04-11-2007 | 02:25 PM
  #4  
Matt D's Avatar
Retired Street Racer
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,318
Likes: 2
From: Southside
Default

I use the "R"s and daily drive the car with them all the way on soft. I like gassing it, pulling the wheels, and landing on grandmas and their walkers. It makes me feel better about myself
Old 04-11-2007 | 03:08 PM
  #5  
JeffT's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: LR, AR
Default

Not much difference to me between the two on the street, however, the R's were much better at the track.
Old 04-11-2007 | 03:50 PM
  #6  
Gary Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley, California
Default

Originally Posted by JeffT
Not much difference to me between the two on the street, however, the R's were much better at the track.
Do you change the settings between track and street? I would expect that the best setting for the track (stiff compression and soft extension) would be unstable on the street.
Old 04-12-2007 | 09:01 AM
  #7  
JeffT's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: LR, AR
Default

Originally Posted by Gary Z
Do you change the settings between track and street? I would expect that the best setting for the track (stiff compression and soft extension) would be unstable on the street.
Yes. I generally ran 1-3 at the track and 7-8 for normal street driving.
Old 04-12-2007 | 09:14 AM
  #8  
jldak318's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Default

qa1's here, single adjustable 12 way.
Old 04-12-2007 | 11:47 AM
  #9  
silverbeast's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Ruffin,N.C.
Default

I am having a hard time deciding on the f series or the R. I still daily drive my car and want it to hold in a corner as well. For a daily driver would the F series be the best all around shock and still perform at the track?
Old 04-12-2007 | 12:32 PM
  #10  
Matt D's Avatar
Retired Street Racer
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,318
Likes: 2
From: Southside
Default

Originally Posted by silverbeast
I am having a hard time deciding on the f series or the R. I still daily drive my car and want it to hold in a corner as well. For a daily driver would the F series be the best all around shock and still perform at the track?
I daily drive my car with the "R"s set on fully soft without any problems. They hold an on/off ramp at 45 mph rather well (and I don't have a front sway bar either)
Old 04-12-2007 | 12:35 PM
  #11  
silverbeast's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Ruffin,N.C.
Default

Thanks Matt. Maybe when i get mine i will be landing on grannies w/ their walkers.lol.
Old 04-12-2007 | 05:05 PM
  #12  
Gary Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley, California
Default

Thanks, everyone. It appears from the responses that some are unaware that QA1 makes two very different types of single-adjustable shocks. I may regret not getting the R-type but have decided to keep the OED7855s. I'm guessing that my main benefit will come from slightly raising my ride height and, of course, this is possible with both types.
Old 04-13-2007 | 12:01 PM
  #13  
bad2000z's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
From: Vestal NY
Default

I have had the F-series for two years. I am now upgrading to the R-series as we speak because with the F-series the front end comes up fast, and then takes a nose dive at the track. I am going with the R-series to keep the weight tranferred to the rear as long as possible after launch. I have talked to other guys who DD their R-series with good results.
Old 04-13-2007 | 12:28 PM
  #14  
Matt D's Avatar
Retired Street Racer
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,318
Likes: 2
From: Southside
Default

Originally Posted by bad2000z
I have had the F-series for two years. I am now upgrading to the R-series as we speak because with the F-series the front end comes up fast, and then takes a nose dive at the track. I am going with the R-series to keep the weight tranferred to the rear as long as possible after launch. I have talked to other guys who DD their R-series with good results.
There are quite a few local guys that have had that same issue. Coming up and down too fast and damaging the oil pan and underneath of the car. ONEBADWS6 and Damge Inc are two of them that switched from the "F"s.
Old 04-13-2007 | 12:31 PM
  #15  
9sec93's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 2
From: NW Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by Matt D
There are quite a few local guys that have had that same issue. Coming up and down too fast and damaging the oil pan and underneath of the car. ONEBADWS6 and Damge Inc are two of them that switched from the "F"s.
i also switched to the R's for the same reason.
Old 04-14-2007 | 06:42 PM
  #16  
Elite_Hot_Rod's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, Texas
Default

The F series shocks are a good start, my car regularly cut 1.3 60ft's using them and it went a 1.27 60ft on the back tires. I didn't upgrade to the R's until the front seals went from doing wheelies on launch to many times.
Old 04-14-2007 | 07:16 PM
  #17  
1BADAIR's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 1
From: oxford, Michigan
Default

BAD2000Z are your old ones for sale?
I wonder if Qa1 will give us a dyno graph of each if we ask
Old 04-16-2007 | 12:00 PM
  #18  
n2ojunkie's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: clio mi
Default

just to be sure I order the right ones can u tell me what part # to order?

OED7855P Front shocks - single adjustable $189.95 ea
DOE7855P Front shocks - double adjustable $339.95 ea.
RC7855P Front shocks - Drag Race "R" $199.95 ea.
15FB275 275 lb. front spring - recommended for drag racing $59.95 ea.
15FB300 300 lb. front spring - recommended for street and strip $59.95 ea.
15FB325 325 lb. front spring - recommended for handling $59.95 ea.


I got this off BMRs site, I plan on doing a complete front end switch. with a new K member and new a arms, I am going to go ahead and do the shocks also.

I drive the car on the street but not as a daily driver, I would like to beable to but its not my primary car. I can put up with alot of little quirks if I have to so would the RC7855p be fine? and what springs?

Thanks in advance I plan on ordering this week.

Last edited by n2ojunkie; 04-16-2007 at 12:08 PM.
Old 04-16-2007 | 04:01 PM
  #19  
2fstws6's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Marysville,OH
Default

What is about the R series that makes them not let the front of your car slam down like the F series. I just got off the phone with a dealer who sell them and he told me I would not like the R because my front would be bouncing around more on the street hitting bumps,etc.He said I should go with the F ? I am realy up in the air now about which ones to buy and I am ready to buy right now.
01 WS6,3400 midwest stall,228/236,588/578,114 comp cam.ported/polished factory heads with manley racemaster valves,etc,12 bolt 3.73,BMR rear susp.
Old 04-16-2007 | 05:57 PM
  #20  
cbrrmike's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: trenton nj
Default

Originally Posted by 2fstws6
What is about the R series that makes them not let the front of your car slam down like the F series. I just got off the phone with a dealer who sell them and he told me I would not like the R because my front would be bouncing around more on the street hitting bumps,etc.He said I should go with the F ? I am realy up in the air now about which ones to buy and I am ready to buy right now.
01 WS6,3400 midwest stall,228/236,588/578,114 comp cam.ported/polished factory heads with manley racemaster valves,etc,12 bolt 3.73,BMR rear susp.

they wont come down as fast because you can adjust both rebound and compression....

side note.........i have the 8 way single adjustable ones on all 4 corners of my car, how should i be setting them up for best results on the track (i currently dd them on the middle setting and have been leaving them there at the track.... im cutting 1.75 60's and want to get that down


Quick Reply: How good are the non-R QA1 shocks for drag racing?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.