PSJ get your ass in here please...
08-15-2007, 03:30 PM
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PSJ get your *** in here please... 9.80 at 140 at Michigan's WORSE track... We be better at KC where you ran the R1...
Our car is only a 357... No Transbrake... Stock Casting heads UNPORTED... with a BABY cam in it... 20 year old headers... A C4 that a junkyard had... With a unmatched carb... OEM and I will repeat OEM FRONT SUSPENSION... With only shocks in the back with 10 year old adjustable uppers...
Oh yeah... We only hit it with a 225 to run that number and we ran out of N20 at the 1,000ft... You have to what? Hit yours with TWO KITS?!?!?!?!?!
To even stay in our ball park!??!?!
Again just friendly trash talking...
Our car is only a 357... No Transbrake... Stock Casting heads UNPORTED... with a BABY cam in it... 20 year old headers... A C4 that a junkyard had... With a unmatched carb... OEM and I will repeat OEM FRONT SUSPENSION... With only shocks in the back with 10 year old adjustable uppers...
Oh yeah... We only hit it with a 225 to run that number and we ran out of N20 at the 1,000ft... You have to what? Hit yours with TWO KITS?!?!?!?!?!
To even stay in our ball park!??!?!
Again just friendly trash talking...
08-15-2007, 04:10 PM
#6
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
Um so you guys are saying you went 9.80 on a fiddy shot? O RLY. But the 140mph pass was on a 225 shot? I saw both of the MI cars running on motor, and you were not in the 10's on motor. We radar'd you.
08-15-2007, 04:11 PM
#7
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
So were you telling the truth when you said how fast that 87 Mustang was going? 
Mind if we bring the LSX Mustang to the LSX shootout? If we can arrange it?
Trending Topics
08-15-2007, 04:13 PM
#8
08-15-2007, 04:16 PM
#9
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How did you sneak a radar gun out to the end of the track with the Pinks Muscle squad down their watching the line and you didn't have a bracelet ?IE you had no way to get acess to that portion of the track.How do you know wether it was or it wasn't in the 10's on motor. It had a nitrous converter and gear in it both cars did.Change the converter and gear both cars could have easily loafed into the 10's
Smells like another fishy PSJ BS adventure. Maybe you should stop hanging out at the truck stops. The lot lizards have left their stench on you.
Smells like another fishy PSJ BS adventure. Maybe you should stop hanging out at the truck stops. The lot lizards have left their stench on you.
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Um so you guys are saying you went 9.80 on a fiddy shot? O RLY. But the 140mph pass was on a 225 shot? I saw both of the MI cars running on motor, and you were not in the 10's on motor. We radar'd you.
08-15-2007, 04:20 PM
#11
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
Originally Posted by SS4Matt
The LS1 Mustang is like mid-high 11's on motor, the nitrous converter is absolute junk without the hose...the car was going high 140's on only a 225 shot. the Motown T-Bird was going similar speeds
I figured about 11.7 on motor and 9.8 - 10.1 on spray.
08-15-2007, 04:38 PM
#12
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
we saw on a hurt motor 11.3 on motor with 2 almost dead holes leaking around 60% so figure the motor that was in the car on race day was say 40 hp stronger. On spray we are pretty sure it went closer to 9.2x it was going close to 150 on a 1.3x 60ft.
Heres food for thought.
The thunderchiken got 4 cars we lost by 1 and that was a 9.60 car by our recokoning before it was pilled.
Heres food for thought.
The thunderchiken got 4 cars we lost by 1 and that was a 9.60 car by our recokoning before it was pilled.
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Thanks Matt, I could tell from the passes. I'm guessing both of those cars are like 2800 raceweight. I was very impressed with the performance of the Mustang, you guys had it dialed in and never opened the hood on it.
I figured about 11.7 on motor and 9.8 - 10.1 on spray.
I figured about 11.7 on motor and 9.8 - 10.1 on spray.
08-15-2007, 04:52 PM
#13
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
Thunderchicken looked 11.3-11.6-ish on motor. What you ran pilled up would be interesting, it's always interesting to know how much nitrous blows up a motor. 93/102 jets you guys said on MM?
08-15-2007, 04:57 PM
#14
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We ran 82 through a shark nozzle. I belive they had a 93 nitrous. Don;t worry none of this will matter soon as both cars are likely to be very hotrodded in the near future.
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Thunderchicken looked 11.3-11.6-ish on motor. What you ran pilled up would be interesting, it's always interesting to know how much nitrous blows up a motor. 93/102 jets you guys said on MM?
