Drag Racing Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: What is the trap speed?
119-121mph
16
47.06%
122-124mph
18
52.94%
125-127 mph
0
0%
128+
0
0%
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

3750lbs, 450RWHP, 1.52 60ft, 500ft DA trap speed is?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2008, 02:34 PM
  #21  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
 
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mobile Ala
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ATVracr
How about this example....

450rwhp ,3680lbs., th400, 12 bolt, 3.73 , 28" tire ..... went 10.3 @ 130mph

438rwhp, 3400lbs., M6, 12 bolt , 4.56 , 28" tire ...... goes 11.3 @ 122mph


Same Dyno!
This isnt a guess I saw both cars on the dyno and both cars run those numbers at the track.

So it does matter!

So where were these passes made, same day same track both cars?

The bottom car looks correct, the top car looks like it is lighter than 3680lbs ALOT lighter...unless it was weighed on 4 corner scales I call BS on that one.

David
Old 03-20-2008, 02:40 PM
  #22  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
 
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mobile Ala
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Trap speeds can vary widely due to gearing, tire size, type of transmission, shift points, appropriateness of torque converter selection.

If you were 3200 raceweight, 5500 ATI converter, 4.56's and 28's you'd run 10.5's on motor no problem. You'd trap 127 no problem.

It all depends.
John If I was at 3200 raceweight I wouldnt need anything else to run 10.50@127 weight reduction in itself would most likely do it...thats 550lbs.

David
Old 03-20-2008, 02:43 PM
  #23  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
ATVracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: GB
Posts: 5,297
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

How do you explain the 8mph difference?

They were dynoed on the same dyno, ran at the same track (not on the same day) one was a 85* day the other a 75* day that doesnt equal 8mph.

Big deal you changed gears and didnt loose mph. Change from an auto to a Manual and you will.

Deos it matter that one car made 460 lbs of torque and the slower one made 400 ft lbs.?
I think so but that isnt your argument.
Old 03-20-2008, 02:47 PM
  #24  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Dave J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think it matters how fast it gets to 450 rwhp as well(rpm) and how long till it falls off

looking at my dynosheet my car stalls at 5400 and by 5700 I am at 410rwhp already and the dyno only goes to 7300 and it doesnt start to fall off yet(sits at 450 rwhp from 6500 onward)

so basically when I race my car is never below 400 rwhp at any time
Old 03-20-2008, 02:48 PM
  #25  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
ATVracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: GB
Posts: 5,297
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Dave J
I think it matters how fast it gets to 450 rwhp as well(rpm) and how long till it falls off
Your right on with that!
Old 03-20-2008, 03:14 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Shift extension, bogging, spinning, peak power, torque curve, revlimiter, short shifting, shifting ability and time, locked converter vs unlocked, head wind/tail wind, aero dynamics, etc.....
Old 03-20-2008, 03:23 PM
  #27  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Dave J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tireburnin
Shift extension, bogging, spinning, peak power, torque curve, revlimiter, short shifting, shifting ability and time, locked converter vs unlocked, head wind/tail wind, aero dynamics, etc.....
converter slippage
Old 03-20-2008, 03:31 PM
  #28  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
 
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mobile Ala
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dave J
converter slippage
This is a factor of FINAL rwhp numbers, correct?
Old 03-20-2008, 03:36 PM
  #29  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
 
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mobile Ala
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ATVracr
How do you explain the 8mph difference?

They were dynoed on the same dyno, ran at the same track (not on the same day) one was a 85* day the other a 75* day that doesnt equal 8mph.

Big deal you changed gears and didnt loose mph. Change from an auto to a Manual and you will.

Deos it matter that one car made 460 lbs of torque and the slower one made 400 ft lbs.?
I think so but that isnt your argument.
Da was definately a factor, 10 degrees will affect trap MPH, I agree not 8 mph worth.

The change from a manual to an auto will most definately affect trap speed, it will loose rwhp. We all know that.

Something is askew on the auto 3680lb car, it either makes more power than stated or weighs considerably less than stated. 450rwhp in a 3700 lb car dont run 130 mph....sorry.


David
Old 03-20-2008, 04:14 PM
  #30  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,718
Received 1,168 Likes on 759 Posts

Default

Yup converter slippage is not getting any attention here.

My Camaro dynoed 413rwhp and went 10.92@122 with a best mph of 10.95@123mph. Dyno does not always tell the tale.
Old 03-20-2008, 04:19 PM
  #31  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
gold98Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: south point,OH
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
This is a factor of FINAL rwhp numbers, correct?
yes it is a factor in peak RWHP, but is average hp and tq a factor i peak rwhp numbers...no it is not. is a converter the same efficiancy thru the entire rpm range and thru the shifts. NO. it is a big factor and a big differance from dyno to going downt the track. not all convertors are created equal. if you have a good clutch, then all manuals with the same gearing are.
Old 03-20-2008, 04:27 PM
  #32  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
 
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mobile Ala
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Yup converter slippage is not getting any attention here.

My Camaro dynoed 413rwhp and went 10.92@122 with a best mph of 10.95@123mph. Dyno does not always tell the tale.
John dont you have 3200 raceweight.....or am I off?

I have seen cam only cars at that weight run those numbers. You are pretty light if memory serves.

David
Old 03-20-2008, 04:28 PM
  #33  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
 
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mobile Ala
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gold98Z28
yes it is a factor in peak RWHP, but is average hp and tq a factor i peak rwhp numbers...no it is not. is a converter the same efficiancy thru the entire rpm range and thru the shifts. NO. it is a big factor and a big differance from dyno to going downt the track. not all convertors are created equal. if you have a good clutch, then all manuals with the same gearing are.
Again this affects ELAPSED TIME....NOT trap speed.

Power to weight=trap speed


I give up.


Anyone seen a Moroso speed/hp/et calculator....check it out.


David
Old 03-20-2008, 05:28 PM
  #34  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
ABA383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southern PA
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I think at least what I'm trying to say is that I have zero faith in dyno numbers as more often than not, they just don't jive with the trap speeds produced...There are so many folks dynoing on what I would consider "happy" dynos and don't trap for crap...I ran a corvette last year with a 466rwhp dyno graph and he only trapped 116 mph at 3500 lbs! And as others have eluded to its also about how fast the motor gets to its peak (how quick it revs), how much area is under the curve, torque numbers, etc...I have tons of area under both hp and tq curves run on a calibrated Mustang dyno and my track results speak for themselves...Its just very hard to predict mph based on dyno numbers, unless you use the same dyno and keep it calibrated...The one Wayne uses is such a dyno and Im sure they keep records of what their dyno numbers equate to at the track...

--Alan
Old 03-20-2008, 05:34 PM
  #35  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
 
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mobile Ala
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ABA383
I think at least what I'm trying to say is that I have zero faith in dyno numbers as more often than not, they just don't jive with the trap speeds produced...There are so many folks dynoing on what I would consider "happy" dynos and don't trap for crap...I ran a corvette last year with a 466rwhp dyno graph and he only trapped 116 mph at 3500 lbs! And as others have eluded to its also about how fast the motor gets to its peak (how quick it revs), how much area is under the curve, torque numbers, etc...I have tons of area under both hp and tq curves run on a calibrated Mustang dyno and my track results speak for themselves...Its just very hard to predict mph based on dyno numbers, unless you use the same dyno and keep it calibrated...The one Wayne uses is such a dyno and Im sure they keep records of what their dyno numbers equate to at the track...

--Alan
Maybe your right Alan, maybe I am pissing up a rope.

David
Old 03-20-2008, 06:15 PM
  #36  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
ATVracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: GB
Posts: 5,297
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

These were both on a Mustang dyno also.

I dont put alot of weight in dyno numbers for lots of reasons every dyno reads a little different, converts, gears, tires all kinds of stuff.

Since we dont race dyno's take it to the track put a number up.
Old 03-20-2008, 07:21 PM
  #37  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
gold98Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: south point,OH
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ATVracr
These were both on a Mustang dyno also.

I dont put alot of weight in dyno numbers for lots of reasons every dyno reads a little different, converts, gears, tires all kinds of stuff.

Since we dont race dyno's take it to the track put a number up.
you dont race your dyno........i knew i was doing something wrong......damnit
Old 03-20-2008, 07:21 PM
  #38  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,718
Received 1,168 Likes on 759 Posts

Default

Dave, 3350 that day. With more converter I'll go 10.7 pretty easily I think.

My old Formula's all motor setup went 11.02@123 1.50 at 3600 raceweight with a 4400 converter.
Old 03-20-2008, 07:38 PM
  #39  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
 
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mobile Ala
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Dave, 3350 that day. With more converter I'll go 10.7 pretty easily I think.

My old Formula's all motor setup went 11.02@123 1.50 at 3600 raceweight with a 4400 converter.
I want to loosen my converter, but with me about to spray I dont see the need.

You got a post on how you got the car that light? I dont want to guyt my car, I love it the way it is.....but damn with my power I could do so much more with less weight. I want to keep my heater and my nice seats.

David
Old 03-20-2008, 08:05 PM
  #40  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Dave J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
I want to loosen my converter, but with me about to spray I dont see the need.

You got a post on how you got the car that light? I dont want to guyt my car, I love it the way it is.....but damn with my power I could do so much more with less weight. I want to keep my heater and my nice seats.

David
I wouldnt go much above 4000 with a nitrous converter with the shot you plan to spray.
but dayum you need to lose weight




















on the car
most of the weight I took out are stuff you wouldnt want to such as heater box all the vents and crap in the dash,airbags,bumper supports,catback,sunvisors,A/C stuff,underlay on carpet,seats(just one race seat)stock belts,sub for stereo,cruise control,light weight wheels,drag brakes,power steering,horn,abs,all the smog crap,if I have time I will cut the crash bars out of the doors,I tried to lose weight myself but its so much easier to just take it off the car,prolly many other things I cant think of

Last edited by Dave J; 03-20-2008 at 08:17 PM.


Quick Reply: 3750lbs, 450RWHP, 1.52 60ft, 500ft DA trap speed is?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 PM.