60´ question
2.2 12.9 112
2.1 12.8 112
2.0 12.7 112
1.9 12.5 113
1.9 12.4 114
so it almost seemed that every .1 i shaved off my 60ft thats exactly what i shaved off the 1/4 and every mph i gained shaved another .1
2.2 12.9 112
2.1 12.8 112
2.0 12.7 112
1.9 12.5 113
1.9 12.4 114
so it almost seemed that every .1 i shaved off my 60ft thats exactly what i shaved off the 1/4 and every mph i gained shaved another .1
Last edited by Ed Wright; Jun 24, 2008 at 10:56 AM.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=kg4iujurWK8
Pass was N/A with a SBC, ladder bar car with a glide.
Trending Topics
As said above, every combo is different. The old saying, .1 = .2 has been around for a long time.
If you do find .1 on your 60' you can expect .15 off your 1/4. Any more, then you're lucky.
Any less, there's probably another issue that needs to be figured out.
Just like weight, 100lbs = .10. Nothing is cut in stone.
.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
As said above, every combo is different. The old saying, .1 = .2 has been around for a long time.
If you do find .1 on your 60' you can expect .15 off your 1/4. Any more, then you're lucky.
Any less, there's probably another issue that needs to be figured out.
Just like weight, 100lbs = .10. Nothing is cut in stone.
.
The 100lbs = 1/10th applies only to lower hp cars. The more power you make, the less 100lbs means.
I have yet to make a single chassis adjustment that effected the back 1/2 of the track's performance.
I have yet to make a single chassis adjustment that effected the back 1/2 of the track's performance.
Our first pass last time out was 1.40 60ft, 9.81@139, second pass was 1.34 60ft 9.64@139, same mph, better 60ft, better than 1:1 improvement and I've seen it many times, on many cars, including my own.
It's really pointless to debate what he said she said stuff, when it's obviously been proven by people doing it countless times. If it only happens on the internet then I guess the time slips I read were make believe or incorrect.
Enough bench racing....moving on to the real world
As I said:
"That is usually either coolant and/or inlet air temps not being controlled, or the car and/or driver not doing the same exact thing every time."
If you or your car can't repeat, many things can effect your times down track. Guess I should have stated that differently. I do know a lot of guys with a lot of passes under their belts, that still can't make two passes in a row the same. That is not the group of racers I was talking about.
What kind of racing do you do? What sanctioning body, and what class/eliminator?
No sanctioning body, no class, just a lot of passes for fun. Oh well, I tried!
FWIW, I'm not argueing, just trying to understand!
Last edited by B18B1LS1; Jun 24, 2008 at 05:45 PM.
I agree. I've been rnning my junk for a couple years, and havea lot of good data, the engineer in me really tries to make an educated adjustment, and evaluation of every change and every run to see what's getting me what, and I have seen one thing that is consistant as the day is long... whatever I get out of my car in the first 330 equates to X amount between there and the 660, and the back 1/2 of the track is very consistant.
Last yeat @ mir for pinks, I went 10.986 @ 123.4 one run, next day, other lane, car went 10.983@123.6 Only thing I did different, was shifted the car about 200 rpm higher the 2nd run. And even that, really didn't make a huge difference.
Both runs off the footbrake too fwiw.
I've done similar this year, 9.85 @ 137.2, 9.890 @ 136.8, only change here, was the car had very little time to cool off bewteen the 2 runs, and the DA went up 12 points from the 2 runs.
I know my car pretty well, what it does off the trialer is about all it's gonna do, it's a real fight to try to get any more out of it.
It likes adjustments that are made at home, it doesn't like to get messed with at the track. Moody bitch





