The great header debate continued. 1 3/4 vs 1 7/8
#21
Well I tested 1 3/4 vs a 1 7/8 on a 402 we built and we lost some torque with the 1 7/8 headers.
I was very suprized since the car was making 505RWHP.
Just goes to show u the 1 3/4 can make good power.
Now on a FI engine I would opt for the larger tubes but if it were me I would just stick to a quality 1 3/4 for anything under 427 cubes
I was very suprized since the car was making 505RWHP.
Just goes to show u the 1 3/4 can make good power.
Now on a FI engine I would opt for the larger tubes but if it were me I would just stick to a quality 1 3/4 for anything under 427 cubes
I'll tell ya, I've not seen any real loss of power, engine for engine, 1 3/4 vs 1 7/8. This was just a good comparison, worthy of posting.
#25
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: se michigan
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so the blue graph line(car you tested 3 months ago) picked up 9rwhp/17rwtq more than the red graph line(car tested recently). I would say that the blue graph car must have had the 1 7/8 headers to make such a difference.
#27
you took the approach i was thinking of. both cars ended up the same, but the one that started out with the lower power is the one that gained more (obviously) so that car will have the better-sized header for that particular application.
#29
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
I just searched 383 strokers. There was one thread that a guy compared 1 3/4 vs 1 7/8 headers on his 383ci with no other changes.... the 1 7/8 gave an extra 5rwhp peak but they were down 10rwtq peak compared to the 1 3/4.
I guess it all comes down to how many cubic inches and what head you put on those cubic inches. For example... a 1 3/4 probley wouldn't hurt you much if you are running a 402 with heads that flow 300cfm compared to running a MTI LS7 head that flows 420cfm.
I guess it all comes down to how many cubic inches and what head you put on those cubic inches. For example... a 1 3/4 probley wouldn't hurt you much if you are running a 402 with heads that flow 300cfm compared to running a MTI LS7 head that flows 420cfm.
#30
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i've still got qtp 1 3/4 tubes on my junk. i have been debating on spending/wasting a grand on switching over to an 1 7/8 tube and am still not convinced/persuaded they are worth much. i don't really see my car picking up 10 rw or more . on spray the 1 7/8 would be alot better.
you have done a good test. now everyone will be waiting on those 2 cars to start modding to see the comparison difference haha. i'll be first. hit them both with a 150 shot and let's see the results.
you have done a good test. now everyone will be waiting on those 2 cars to start modding to see the comparison difference haha. i'll be first. hit them both with a 150 shot and let's see the results.
#37
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Very interesting Ed. Glad to see you post such surprising set of graphs. Looked to me that when everything was tuned it was just about equal. Not a big enough gain/loss on either side to justify one size or the other.
Like everyone said until you go bigger cubes (427 or above) or (FI on a smaller ci) it seems to be a personal choice 1 3/4 or 1 7/8. Now with that being said if I was running a big cam 346 with a healthy shot of spray I'd like to take advantage of the 1 7/8 header to maximize my power while spraying.
Like everyone said until you go bigger cubes (427 or above) or (FI on a smaller ci) it seems to be a personal choice 1 3/4 or 1 7/8. Now with that being said if I was running a big cam 346 with a healthy shot of spray I'd like to take advantage of the 1 7/8 header to maximize my power while spraying.
#38
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
Nice to see the test. I was lucky enough to test 3 different headers on the same car and tune them to max performance on a 03 Z06. My test showed the 1 7/8 making more hp everywhere. The other 2 were 1 3/4 size headers and there was a big difference between the 2 in the low end area.
Haven't done any back/back on the 05+ Vette's.
Haven't done any back/back on the 05+ Vette's.
#39
Nice to see the test. I was lucky enough to test 3 different headers on the same car and tune them to max performance on a 03 Z06. My test showed the 1 7/8 making more hp everywhere. The other 2 were 1 3/4 size headers and there was a big difference between the 2 in the low end area.
Haven't done any back/back on the 05+ Vette's.
Haven't done any back/back on the 05+ Vette's.
We should be doing a single vehicle, 1 3/4 to 1 7/8 test in the next few weeks.